Empowering Patients' Lung Cancer Screening Uptake (Empower-LCS)
Empowering Patients' Lung Cancer Screening Uptake (Empower LCS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Gelareh Sadigh, MD
- Phone Number: 949-745-5066
- Email: GSADIGH@UCI.EDU
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Agnes Zhou
- Email: empowerlcs@hs.uci.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Costa Mesa, California, United States, 92627
- UCI Health - Costa Mesa
-
Irvine, California, United States, 92697
- UCI Health Gottschalk Medical Plaza
-
Laguna Hills, California, United States, 92653
- UCI Health - Laguna Hills
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
- UCI Health - Newport Beach MacArthur
-
Orange, California, United States, 92868
- UCI Medical Center
-
Tustin, California, United States, 92670
- UCI Health - Tustin
-
Yorba Linda, California, United States, 92886
- UCI Health-Yorba Linda
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Patients' Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 50- 80 years of age.
- Be able to Speak English, Spanish, or Vietnamese
- Must have a scheduled appointment with their Primary Care Providers within next one to three months.
- The Scheduled PCP appointment is at any of the UCI Health primary care clinics in Orange County including two UCI federally qualified health centers
- History of 20 pack year smoking history ( based on survey self report)
- Current smoker or a former smoker who has quit smoking within the last 15 years (based on survey self report)
Patients' Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior history of lung cancer
- chest CT for any reason in the last 12 months based on self-report and UCI EMR
- history of Alzheimer's disease or dementia
Providers' Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary Care Providers whose patients were enrolled in the Empower LCS trial.
- Received notifications about the eligibility of their patients for lung cancer screening.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empower LCS
Patient will be given education material(addressing knowledge barriers); patients' referral to financial navigation resources (addressing health-related social risks); and patients' reminder to discuss LCS during PCP visit.
Providers will also be notified of eligibility of their patients to receive LCS.
|
Patients will be sent information (in preferred language) on lung cancer risk, lung cancer screening (LCS) benefits, harms, false positive rates, recommendations of follow-up for positive results, and exam insurance coverage.
Patients who self-report needing help with health-related social risks at baseline will be sent a brochure (in preferred language) from patient advocate foundation (PAF), a national non-profit financial navigation organization, where patients can self-refer.
Within 2 weeks prior to primary care appointment, patients will receive a text message or a phone call (if not having a phone that receives text messaging) encouraging patients to discuss the LCS with their provider.
Within 2 weeks prior to primary care appointment, providers will be notified of their patient's eligibility for LCS.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Order of LDCT
Time Frame: within 6 months of enrollment
|
Number of participants who were ordered screening with Low Dose Computed Tomographyorder (LDCT) within 6 months after enrollment, assessed with self-reported surveys or EMR data extraction.
|
within 6 months of enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Receipt of LDCT
Time Frame: Within 6 months of enrollment
|
Number of participants who were completed screening with Low Dose Computed Tomographyorder (LDCT) within 6 months after enrollment, assessed with self-reported surveys or EMR data extraction.
|
Within 6 months of enrollment
|
|
LCS Discussion
Time Frame: within 6 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who had a discussion about screening with Low Dose Computed Tomographyorder (LDCT) with their primary care provider measured within 6 months after enrollment, through self-reported surveys or EMR documentation of discussion in the primary care notes.
|
within 6 months after enrollment
|
|
Perceived Risk of Lung Cancer
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
3-item validated survey questions (from Carter Harris et al) assessing patients' perceived risk of lung cancer.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 3-15.
Higher score= higher perceived risk of lung cancer.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Perceived Severity of Lung Cancer
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
5-item validated survey questions assessing patients' perceived severity of lung cancer.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 5-25.
Higher score= higher perceived severity of lung cancer.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Perceived Benefit of Lung Cancer Screening
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
6-item validated survey questions (from Carter Harris et al) assessing patients' perceived benefits of lung cancer screening.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 6-30.
Higher score= higher perceived benefits of lung cancer screening.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
19-item validated survey questions (from Carter Harris et al) assessing patients' perceived barriers to lung cancer screening.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 19-95.
Higher score= higher perceived barriers to lung cancer screening.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Perceived Self-efficacy for Lung Cancer Screening
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
10-item validated survey questions (from Carter Harris et al) assessing patients' perceived self-efficacy to undergo lung cancer screening.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 5-50.
Higher score= higher perceived self-efficacy.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Knowledge About Lung Cancer and Screening
Time Frame: At 6 months post-enrollment
|
Knowledge of lung cancer and LCS was assessed using 8-items validated questions (from Volk et al), and scored by awarding one point per correct answer selected and one point per incorrect answer not selected.
The total score was calculated as sum of all points.
Total score ranged between 0 to 8. Higher score= higher knowledge.
|
At 6 months post-enrollment
|
|
Providers' Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening
Time Frame: Baseline
|
9-item survey questions assessing providers' perceived barriers to lung cancer screening.
Item responses use 5-point Likert scale.
Total scores are calculated by summing item responses.
Score is ranging between 9-45.
Higher score= higher perceived barriers to lung cancer screening.
|
Baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient and Provider Experience With Intervention
Time Frame: At the end of all study enrollments a subgroup of patients and providers were interviewed
|
Patient and Providers were asked questions about their experience with intervention components.
Outcomes
|
At the end of all study enrollments a subgroup of patients and providers were interviewed
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gelareh Sadigh, MD, University of California, Irvine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3432
- UCI 23-107 (Other Identifier: University of California Irvine IRB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.