Interventions For Neck Pain In Relation to Internet Usage
A Comparıson Of Different Interventions For Neck Paın In Relation to Internet Usage Rates
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hazal GENÇ, PhD
- Phone Number: 05413204291
- Email: hazaloksuz@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Gamze Demircioğlu, PhD
Study Locations
-
-
None Selected
-
Istanbul, None Selected, Turkey, 34353
- Hazal GENÇ
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 20 and 25 years old, have internet addiction
- have neck pain complaints for more than three months
- low category according to the International Physical Activity Index.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who had mobility limitations and neurological problems -had spinal surgery, had a traffic accident in the last three months and were injured by whiplash injury mechanism- visual and hearing impairments,
- refused to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: postural exercise
An 8-week home exercise program consisting of neck exercises was applied for group 1.
The exercise program was carried out three times a week for eight weeks.
|
The exercises consisted of 4-way neck isometric exercises and stretching exercises for the activation of deep cervical flexors (chin tuck exercise) and combined with this exercise.
This protocol consisted of protocols studied in similar studies.
|
|
Active Comparator: aerobic exercise
An 8-week walking program was planned for Group 2 using pedometer feedback as a motivational tool.
|
The walking program was carried out daily on a flat surface with a target of 7000 steps.
This goal is based on the American College of Sports Medicine reports on the minimum recommended levels of physical activity required to achieve health benefits, which includes several design elements.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
internet addiction scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Young's internet addiction scale is a 20-question self-report scale developed by Young.
There are answers to the questions as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Often", "Very often", "Constantly".
According to the survey; He was defined as "Internet addict" when he scored 80 and above
|
8 weeks
|
|
Disability Index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Neck Disability Index is a frequently used scale to evaluate neck disability in the clinic.
Pain intensity assesses perceived neck pain in personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and leisure activities.
It was determined as "0" as the best and "50" as the worst
|
8 weeks
|
|
Physical Activity Index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The International Physical Activity Index, developed to measure the physical activity levels of individuals aged 15-65, asks questions about their physical activity in the last 7 days.It has three categories: Inactive (Category 1), Minimally Active (Category 2), Very Active (Category 3).
|
8 weeks
|
|
stress scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Perceived stress scale, this scale is used to measure stress perceptions.
In this scale, which has 14 questions in total, the answers are "Never", "Almost never", "Sometimes", "Quite often", "Very often".
In this test, the lowest "0" and the highest "56" points can be obtained; high values indicate the height of the stress perceived by the person .
|
8 weeks
|
|
Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, developed by Buysse et al. in 1989, consists of 24 questions evaluating sleep status in the last 1 month.
A minimum score of 21 is obtained.
High scores indicate poor sleep quality
|
8 weeks
|
|
anxiety scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Beck anxiety scale consists of four options as "Never", "Mild", "Moderate", "Severe" considering the questionnaire responses in the last week.
This scale, which has a score between 0-63 points, evaluates the symptoms of anxiety and is calculated as 63 points for the worst result.
If the results are lower than 21, it indicates mild anxiety, 22-35 indicates moderate anxiety, and higher than 36 indicates severe anxiety
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-10840098-772.02-4942
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.