A Clinical Prospective Study to Validate a Risk Scoring Model for the HMGC After Curative Surgery

November 17, 2025 updated by: Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

A Clinical Prospective Study to Validate a Risk Scoring Model for the Hepatic Metastases From Gastric Cancer After Curative Surgery

A previous study of investigators established a risk scoring model for occurrence of postoperative hepatic metastases in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy directly without neoadjuvant therapy. In order to further validate the clinical applicability of abovementioned model, investigators designed this prospective study, which also included patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, with the aim of exploring the applicability of the risk scoring model to this group of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The study was a single-centre, prospective study. Prospectively collected data were used to analyze the consistency between the actual outcomes of patients with or without hepatic metastases after curative gastrectomy and the predicted outcomes of the risk scoring model, in order to assess the clinical applicability of the model. In addition, analyses were performed to compare the differences in the risk of hepatic metastasis and the time interval of occurrence between patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy and those who received neoadjuvant therapy, as well as between patients with different outcomes after receiving neoadjuvant therapy (TRG 0-1 vs. TRG 2-3 in postoperative pathology).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jingyu Deng, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +86-22-23340123
  • Email: dengery@126.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China, 300060
        • Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patietns who were diagnosed with gastric cancer pathologically and underwent curative gastrectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Received curative gastrectomy (D2 lymph node dissection);
  2. Gastric cancer without distant organ metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis and peritoneal implantation (M0) confirmed by postoperative pathology;
  3. No hepatic tumors and other occupying diseases, no chronic diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatitis, no hepatic schistosomiasis, no hepatic echinococcosis, no hepatic tuberculosis, and no severe fatty liver disease before the curative surgery;
  4. No history of intraperitoneal chemotherapy;
  5. No other serious concomitant diseases with satisfactory organ function;
  6. No history of other malignant tumors;
  7. Comply with the protocol during the whole study period;
  8. Sign informed consent and permission of withdraw in the whole study period;
  9. Estimation the overall survival after surgery no less than 12 months;
  10. Consent to analysis of clinicopathological data and prognostic follow up;
  11. Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) more than 60.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Special histological types of gastric cancer (neuroendocrine, squamous, squamous cell, hepatoid adenocarcinoma or others);
  2. Gastro-esophageal junction cancer;
  3. Severe congestive heart failure, frequent arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction within 12 months;
  4. Immunosuppressive therapists for organ transplantation;
  5. Seriously uncontrolled recurrent infection;
  6. History of other malignancies;
  7. No abilities of self-knowledge or mental disorders;
  8. Combination of other serious diseases;
  9. Concurrent participation in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
with HMGC
patients with gastric cancer who developed hepatic metastasis after curative gastrectomy
without HMGC
patients with gastric cancer who did not developed hepatic metastasis after curative gastrectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hepatic metastasis
Time Frame: 2 years after curative surgery
Postoperative telephone follow-up was performed in patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy to determine the occurrence of hepatic metastasis.
2 years after curative surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
interval between the surgery and hepatic metastasis
Time Frame: 2 years after curative surgery
Postoperative telephone follow-up was performed in patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy to determine the interval between the gastrectomy and development of hepatic metastasis.
2 years after curative surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DJY003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings