Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides Difficile Infection

October 24, 2023 updated by: The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides Difficile Infection: a Real World Research

This is a real-world study to explore the safety and the efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation （WMT） for patients with Clostridioides Difficile Infection （CDI）.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

At least 12 subjects who meet all the inclusion criteria but do not meet any exclusion criteria will be enrolled in this study. Data of demographic characteristics, intestinal symptoms, medicine treatment usage and clinical outcomes will be collected. After treatment, they will enter the follow-up period （at least for 4-week post-WMT）for safety and efficacy evaluation. Subjects with no response and recurrence will receive salvage therapy, and the extended follow-up period will be performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210011
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Jie Zhang
          • Phone Number: 58509931

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

National patients with CDI receiving WMT will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to enter the study:

  1. At the time of informed consent, male or non-pregnant or non-lactating female.

  2. The diagnostic criteria for C. difficile infection are met during screening:

    1. Medical records confirming CDI prior to screening (laboratory tests are positive for Clostridium difficile or its toxin): Clostridium difficile toxin test is positive (determined by EIisa test), or colonoscopy indicates pseudomembranous enteritis; Or Glutamate dehydrogenase positive, toxin negative, there are obvious causes and diarrhea.
    2. CDI-related diarrhea episodes, i.e., defecation ≥3 times/day for at least two consecutive days with unformed stools (Bristol score 6-7).
  3. The subject or his/her legal representative gives informed consent, fully understands the purpose of the study, is able to communicate effectively with the investigator, and comprehends and complies with the requirements set forth in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting any of the following exclusion criteria must be excluded from the study:

  1. Subjects with immune deficiencies (such as HIV infection, or neutrophils <0.5×109/L in absolute value, or lymphocytes <0.5×109/L, etc.), or on immunosuppressants, or on medium to high doses of steroid hormones (≥20g/d of prednisone or equal doses of steroid hormones).
  2. There is rectal outlet obstruction (such as rectal mucosal prolapse) or significant intestinal stenosis assessed by the investigator and colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing cannot be performed.
  3. Confirmed or clinically suspected infection with pathogenic microorganisms other than Clostridium difficile prior to screening.
  4. Have had major abdominal surgery (other than laparoscopic gallbladder or appendectomy), previous partial or total colectomy, previous partial small intestinal resection, or previous gastroduodenal surgery within 6 months prior to screening.
  5. At the time of screening, the subject or his/her legal representative refuses to take effective contraception within 3 months after the last treatment.
  6. According to the judgment of the investigator, the subjects are not suitable to participate in this clinical study, or participation in this clinical study cannot guarantee the rights and interests of the subjects.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) assessed by CTCAE, Version 5.0
Time Frame: Four-week post-WMT
The severity of AE was graded as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe/disabling (grade 3), life threatening (grade 4), and death (grade 5). All AE were divided in definitely, probably and possibly related to treatment. The treatment-related AE we focused on included microbiota-related AEs (e.g., infection, diarrhea, abdominal pain, etc.) and route of delivery related AEs (e.g., nausea, vomiting, etc.).
Four-week post-WMT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The complete response rate of CDI-related diarrhea
Time Frame: Four-week post-WMT，eight-week post-WMT
The complete response of CDI-related diarrhea was defined as there was no diarrhea (1-2 times/day) for at least two consecutive days (normal stool characteristics (Bristol score ≤5) after treatment.
Four-week post-WMT，eight-week post-WMT
Recurrence rate of CDI-related diarrhea.
Time Frame: Four-week post-WMT，eight-week post-WMT
Recurrence was defined as the CDI-related diarrhea reappeared, and the Clostridium difficile toxin test was positive after achieving complete response.
Four-week post-WMT，eight-week post-WMT
Rate of major disease progression in CDI.
Time Frame: One-week post-WMT，Two-week post-WMT
Disease progression refers to the worsening of symptoms associated with CDI, including increased diarrhea, toxic megacolon, organ failure, the need for emergency colectomy, and even death.
One-week post-WMT，Two-week post-WMT
The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) assessed by CTCAE, Version 5.0
Time Frame: Eight-week post-WMT，six-month-post-WMT
The severity of AE was graded as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe/disabling (grade 3), life threatening (grade 4), and death (grade 5). All AE were divided in definitely, probably and possibly related to treatment. The treatment-related AE we focused on included microbiota-related AEs (e.g., infection, diarrhea, abdominal pain, etc.) and route of delivery related AEs (e.g., nausea, vomiting, etc.).
Eight-week post-WMT，six-month-post-WMT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Faming Zhang, The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WMT-RWS-CDI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings