CONFIDENCE-AI Financial Education for Caregivers (CONFIDENCE-AI) (CONFIDENCE-AI)
An AI-Embedded Intervention to Promote Financial Wellbeing Among Latino Family Caregivers
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Kylie Meyer, PhD
- Phone Number: 2163681928
- Email: knm77@case.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- Case Western Reserve University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identified caregiver to a person living with probable Alzheimer's disease or related dementia
- Person living with dementia meets stage 4 to 6 criteria on Global Deterioration Scale according to the family caregiver
- Has been at least 6 months since the care recipient began to experience dementia symptoms
- Latino/Hispanic ethnicity.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who plan to place their family member in a nursing home in the next 3 months
- Unreliable access to internet, tablet or smart phone, and email
- Does not agree to participate in at least 3 of the 4 group sessions and/or register for the NeuViCare app
- Unable to read and speak in English or Spanish
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CONFIDENCE AI
Participants will attend the 4-week CONFIDENCE-AI Program.
This program will include attending 4 group-based sessions delivered by videoconference.
Each session will last approximately 1.5 hours each and will cover topics such as how to budget, accessing community resources to displace the out-of-pocket costs of caregiving, asking for help, and more.
Participation will be supplemented by access to a digital app to support engagement, such as through text messaging and resources navigation support.
|
Multicomponent psychoeducational intervention focused on financial wellbeing
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Financial Strain
Time Frame: The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
Financial strain will be measured using the 11-item Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Scale.
A modified version of COST demonstrates validity and reliability when tested among cancer caregivers (α=0.91;
range: 0 to 44).
COST items are generic enough to be applicable to caregivers to persons PLWD without further modification (e.g., "I feel financially stressed").
Caregivers are asked to indicate if each statement applies to them "Not at all" (0) to "Very much" (4).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of financial strain.
|
The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
|
Resourcefulness
Time Frame: The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
Resourcefulness is measured using the 28-item Caregiver Resourcefulness Scale (alpha=0.85).
This scale has two factors: one focused on help-seeking and another on self-help.
Caregivers are asked the frequency at which they use different strategies to manage challenges, and may respond: Not at all like me (0), Pretty much not like me (1), A little bit not like me (2), A little bit like me (3), Pretty much like much like me (4), or Very much like me (5).
Items are added together to create a total score.
Scores range from 0 to 140, where higher scores indicate higher levels of resourcefulness.
The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores
|
The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
Self-efficacy is measured using the Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale.
This 8-item scale asks about multiple domains of self-efficacy (e.g., managing behavioral symptoms, accessing respite, and controlling upsetting thoughts).
It demonstrates high reliability (alpha=0.89)
and good test-retest reliability (0.73).
Participants rate the extent to which they are "Not confident at all" (1) to "Totally confident" (10).
Scores range from 8 (lowest level of self-efficacy) to 80 (highest level of self-efficacy).
|
The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until post-intervention (1 month post-baseline) and 2 months post-intervention (3-months after the baseline).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kylie Meyer, PhD, Case Western Reserve University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ritter PL, Sheth K, Stewart AL, Gallagher-Thompson D, Lorig K. Development and Evaluation of the Eight-Item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-8). Gerontologist. 2022 Mar 28;62(3):e140-e149. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa174.
- Zauszniewski JA, Lai CY, Tithiphontumrong S. Development and testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults. J Nurs Meas. 2006 Spring-Summer;14(1):57-68. doi: 10.1891/jnum.14.1.57.
- Sadigh G, Switchenko J, Weaver KE, Elchoufi D, Meisel J, Bilen MA, Lawson D, Cella D, El-Rayes B, Carlos R. Correlates of financial toxicity in adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06424-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY20230876
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.