The Physiotherapy Approaches in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
The Effect of Electromyographic Biofeedback and Proprioception Exercises on Pain and Functionality in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florya
-
Istanbul, Florya, Turkey
- Istanbul Aydin University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome,
- Being between the ages of 18 and 65,
- Not having received medical treatment,
- Not having received a shoulder-related physiotherapy program in the last year,
- Not having had any shoulder-related surgery,
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurological deficits of the upper extremity and the presence of another orthopedic disorder, rheumatic or congenital disease other than subacromial impingement syndrome,
- Presence of mental problem,
- Having received corticosteroid treatment in the last year,
- Upper extremity fracture,
- Acute cervical pathology,
- Having cardiovascular and systemic diseases that prevent working,
- Pregnancy,
- Those with communication problems.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Proprioception Exercise Group
Wand exercises and Proprioception exercises
|
Patients trained for proprioception exercises.
Patients were educated with wand exercises.
|
|
Active Comparator: Proprioception exercises with Electromyographic Biofeedback
Wand exercises and Proprioception exercises with Electromyographic Biofeedback
|
Patients were educated with wand exercises.
Patients trained for Proprioception exercises with Electromyographic Biofeedback
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale was used to measure shoulder function.
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale consists of 30 items.
The total score that can be obtained from items scored between 1-5 varies between 0-100.
An increase in the score indicates a decrease in function.
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Joint range of motion
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Active shoulder flexion, abduction, and external-internal rotation range of motion was measured with goniometer.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Shoulder flexion, abduction, and external-internal rotator muscle strength was measured with manual muscle tester.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Proprioception
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
To evaluate joint position sense, laser pointer-assisted angle reproduction test was applied for measurements at 55°-90°-125° flexion and abduction angles.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The severity of pain was measured Visual analogue scale.
ccording to this scale, patients rated their pain between 0 and 10.
As the score increases, the pain increases.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The amount of improvement or deterioration in patients was assessed with the "Global Rating Change Scale".This scale is scored according to a 7-point Likert type (-3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: the same, 1: slightly better, 2: quite better, 3: much better).
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ebru Kaya Mutlu, Professor, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University
- Study Chair: Buse Aydin, M.Sc., Istabul Aydin University
- Study Chair: Yasemin Karaaslan, Asst. Prof., Mustafa Kemal University
- Study Chair: Hanifegül Taskiran, Professor, Istanbul Aydın University
- Study Chair: Nezih Ziroglu, MD, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.