SSM Predicts Outcomes of CLD Inpatients With Acute Liver Injury

May 19, 2025 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Spleen Stiffness Measurement Predicts Short-term Outcomes of Chronic Liver Disease Inpatients With Acute Liver Injury: a Prospective, Observational and Multicentre Study

In this study, a single non-invasive tool, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), was used to monitor the disease regression of inpatients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and acute liver injury. The present study aimed to establish an early diagnosis warning model for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) by SSM and investigate the effect of dynamic changes in SSM on the short-term prognosis (28-day, 90-day morbidity and mortality) of inpatients with CLD and acute liver injury.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Portal hypertension is a major complication of cirrhosis and can lead to serious clinical manifestations such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, etc. Colecchia et al. proposed the use of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) to dynamically monitor portal pressure and to predict the risk of oesophageal varices. Studies have now demonstrated the utility of SSM in assessing portal hypertension, ruling out high-risk varices, and predicting clinical complications in cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, the Baveno VII consensus of portal hypertension has included SSM in its recommendations for non-invasive screening. Pathogenic triggers, important clinical events (ascites, encephalopathy, etc.), and short-term prognosis in compensated advanced chronic liver disease are associated with portal pressure. Exploring the relationship between portal hypertension and liver failure development would be of great clinical and scientific value. The present study is mainly based on a single non-invasive tool, SSM, to monitor the disease regression of chronic liver disease (CLD) inpatients with acute liver injury, to establish an early warning model for early diagnosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure, and to investigate the effect of dynamic changes in SSM on the short-term prognosis of inpatients with CLD and acute liver injury.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
411

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jinjun Chen, PHD
  • Phone Number: 86-18588531001
  • Email: chjj@smu.edu.cn

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Hepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis or other chronic liver diseases and hospitalized for acute liver injury with total bilirubin [TB] ≥3 mg/dl were admitted.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 years and 80 years
  2. Chronic liver diseases regardless of etiology
  3. Acute liver injury with total bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dl regardless of inducement

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior surgery of liver diseases before enrollment such as liver transplantation, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), splenectomy and partial splenic embolization
  2. Severe extrahepatic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease level IV, chronic kidney disease with end-stage renal failure, myocardial infarction within 3 months before admission
  3. Receiving Immunosuppressive drugs for reasons rather than chronic liver diseases
  4. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or other non-liver malignancies during screening period
  5. Serious mental illnesses such as anxiety, depressive disorders to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  6. The pregnant
  7. Jaundice due to biliary obstruction or cholestasis
  8. Unsuitable to participate in this study judging by investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day transplant-free mortality
Time Frame: Day 90
The primary endpoint was 90-day transplant-free mortality, defined as all-cause death within 90 days, including deaths within the initial hospitalization, after discharge, after transfer to other acute care facilities, and requiring readmission.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI)
Time Frame: From admission to Day 90
AKI is defined as a change in SCr of ≥ 0.3 mg/dl (26.5 μmol/L) in ≤ 48 h, or a 50% increase in SCr from a baseline that is known or presumed to have occurred in the past 7 days.
From admission to Day 90
Rate of progression to acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)
Time Frame: From admission to Day 90
ACLF was defined according to the European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) criteria. ACLF grade-1 includes three subgroups: 1) patients with single kidney failure; 2) patients with single failure of the liver, coagulation, circulation or respiration, who had serum creatinine ranging from 1.5 to 1.9 mg/dl and/or mild-to-moderate hepatic encephalopathy; and 3) patients with single cerebral failure who had serum creatinine ranging from 1.5 and 1.9 mg/dl. ACLF grade-2: patients with two organs failure. ACLF grade-3: patients with three organ failures or more. ACLF development: patients with absence of ACLF on admission and progression to ACLF within 28 days. The severity of liver disease was evaluated by the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child-Pugh score and CLIF-AD score (in those without ACLF).
From admission to Day 90
Rate for readmission of patients hospitalized with acute liver injury
Time Frame: From discharge to Day 90
The readmission was rehospitalization with liver-related complications (including bacterial infection, variceal bleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, or a new onset or worsening of ascites) at any ward to any hospital in the following discharge from the index admission with acute liver injury.
From discharge to Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jinjun Chen, PHD, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2023-495

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Use a public management platform for clinical trials and make it accessible to the public, or contact the investigator for primary data by E-mail.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The deidentified individual patient data (IPD) underlying the results presented in the article (including tables, figures, and appendices or supplementary material) no later than six months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available on request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings