Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Healthcare System Preparedness to Increase Cognitive Assessment Rates for Older Adults

January 9, 2024 updated by: Robert Perneczky, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
In this study the investigators explore a pragmatic strategy to increase cognitive screening rates in the community. The investigators will compare the monetary value of different combinations of SCD questionnaires, digital cognitive tests, and blood Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers to identify the best approach for primary care settings.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to perform a cluster-randomized study, exploring the effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of a pragmatic strategy to increase cognitive screening rates in the community. Participants will be older adults attending social and cultural centers in the greater Munich area. The investigators will compare the monetary value of different combinations of SCD questionnaires, digital cognitive tests, and blood AD biomarkers to identify the best approach for primary care settings. As secondary aims, qualitative interviews will be conducted with general practitioners (GPs) and their patients to explore the acceptability of the proposed new screening strategy; furthermore, the diagnostic utility of an artificial intelligence-based automated analysis of speech will be assessed. The initiative will not only generate novel insights into the optimal approach for large-scale cognitive screening in the general population, but also contribute to an urgently required cultural change in Germany, resulting in a sustainable solution for effective and efficient early recognition and prevention of dementia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 65 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger than 65 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q)/no other procedure
Participants will undergo procedure as usual and fill out the questionnaire SCD-Q
Diagnostic test: Subjective cognitive decline questionnaire (SCD-Q)
The SCD-Q is a validated questionnaire assessing the presence of subjective cognitive deterioration in abilities such as memory, attention, language, and executive function. The scale includes 24 dichotomous questions (yes/no), evaluating decline in daily life during the last two years. The SCD-Q score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cognitive change (cut-off classified as SCD equal or greater as 7).
Diagnostic test: ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C)
The ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C) can be collected remotely in fully automated telephone visits, taking 15 minutes to complete based on three specific assessments measuring learning and memory, processing speed, executive function, and language capabilities. The ki:e SB-C uses artificial intelligence and automatic speech analysis to process and transcribe speech, followed by an extraction of relevant features, combined into four subdomain and one global cognition score.
Other: SCD-Q + digital cognitive testing using Cognigram
Participants will undergo procedure as usual with their GP, additionally they will fill out the SCD-Q and undergo cognitive testing (Cognigram)
Diagnostic test: Subjective cognitive decline questionnaire (SCD-Q)
The SCD-Q is a validated questionnaire assessing the presence of subjective cognitive deterioration in abilities such as memory, attention, language, and executive function. The scale includes 24 dichotomous questions (yes/no), evaluating decline in daily life during the last two years. The SCD-Q score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cognitive change (cut-off classified as SCD equal or greater as 7).
Diagnostic test: ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C)
The ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C) can be collected remotely in fully automated telephone visits, taking 15 minutes to complete based on three specific assessments measuring learning and memory, processing speed, executive function, and language capabilities. The ki:e SB-C uses artificial intelligence and automatic speech analysis to process and transcribe speech, followed by an extraction of relevant features, combined into four subdomain and one global cognition score.
Diagnostic test: Cognigram
Cognigram (previously known as the Cogstate Brief Battery) is a brief, computer-administered cognitive test battery requiring about 20-25 minutes for administration, consisting of four cognitive tasks to measure psychomotor function, attention, working memory, and learning and memory. Eisai owns the commercial rights for Cognigram and has kindly agreed to offer the required licenses for the present project free of charge. Digital cognitive testing will take place in the respective social and care centers on a tablet which is not connected to the internet. Testing will be performed pseudonymized and data from the cognitive tests will be downloaded regularly by the study team and added to the database at LMU hospital.
Other: SCD-Q + Cognigram + blood-based biomarkers
Participants will undergo procedure as usual with their GP, additionally they will fill out the SCD-Q and undergo cognitive testing (Cognigram). The blood-based biomarkers will be determined.
Diagnostic test: Subjective cognitive decline questionnaire (SCD-Q)
The SCD-Q is a validated questionnaire assessing the presence of subjective cognitive deterioration in abilities such as memory, attention, language, and executive function. The scale includes 24 dichotomous questions (yes/no), evaluating decline in daily life during the last two years. The SCD-Q score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cognitive change (cut-off classified as SCD equal or greater as 7).
Diagnostic test: ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C)
The ki:elements digital speech biomarker for cognition (ki:e SB-C) can be collected remotely in fully automated telephone visits, taking 15 minutes to complete based on three specific assessments measuring learning and memory, processing speed, executive function, and language capabilities. The ki:e SB-C uses artificial intelligence and automatic speech analysis to process and transcribe speech, followed by an extraction of relevant features, combined into four subdomain and one global cognition score.
Diagnostic test: Cognigram
Cognigram (previously known as the Cogstate Brief Battery) is a brief, computer-administered cognitive test battery requiring about 20-25 minutes for administration, consisting of four cognitive tasks to measure psychomotor function, attention, working memory, and learning and memory. Eisai owns the commercial rights for Cognigram and has kindly agreed to offer the required licenses for the present project free of charge. Digital cognitive testing will take place in the respective social and care centers on a tablet which is not connected to the internet. Testing will be performed pseudonymized and data from the cognitive tests will be downloaded regularly by the study team and added to the database at LMU hospital.
Diagnostic test: blood-based biomarkers
Blood plasma and serum samples will be collected by the project staff according to standard operating procedures used at LMU Munich and subsequently processed and measured at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy to quantify the blood-based biomarkers for AD using Elecsys immunoassays running on a Cobas e402 analyzer. All test results (including the respective cut-off measurements for normal vs abnormal) will be forwarded directly to the participants' GPs. No further explanations and instructions will be provided to avoid any unwanted bias, and participants will only be informed about their results by their doctors. Roche has kindly offered to provide blood biomarker assays free of charge for the present project.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participating individuals screening positive for SCD
Time Frame: Baseline
The primary endpoint of this protocol is to assess the proportion of participating individuals aged 65 years or older screening positive for SCD during the intervention period who are referred to specialist evaluation, by study arm (intent to treat)
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of individuals with early-stage AD diagnosis
Time Frame: Baseline
Proportion of individuals formally diagnosed with early-stage AD in a specialist clinic, by study arm
Baseline
average time to diagnosis of AD
Time Frame: Baseline
Average time to diagnosis of early-stage AD, by study arm
Baseline
Qualitative interviews
Time Frame: Baseline
Qualitative participant and GP interviews on perceived changes/benefits/barriers, lessons learned, etc., per study arm
Baseline
Correlation with speech analysis and other diagnostic tests
Time Frame: Baseline
Correlation of ki:e SB-C global and domain cognitive scores with established AD neuropsychological tests and biomarkers (PET, cerebrospinal fluid, blood) and added value of automated speech assessment in routine cognitive assessment
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hoffmann-La Roche
University of Southern California
Eisai Limited
ki:elements
Johanniter-Unfall-Hilfe e.V.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Perneczky, Prof. Dr., Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des LMU Klinikums

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-0786

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings