FUnctional Selection of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients for Talazoparib Treatment Using the REpair Capacity (RECAP) Test (FUTURE)

February 26, 2025 updated by: Dr. Agnes Jager MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

FUnctional Selection of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients for Talazoparib Treatment Using the REpair Capacity (RECAP) Test: The FUTURE Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to prove that the RECAP test is capable of selecting advanced breast cancer patients sensitive for treatment with the PARP inhibitor talazoparib. Participants will undergo an ultrasound-guided biopsy and a blood withdrawal. Homologous Recombination (HR) deficient patients (approximately 30%) can start talazoparib treatment until progression of the disease or unacceptable side-effects and their response will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single arm, prospective multicenter study among patients with advanced breast cancer with RECAP-based HRD phenotype who will be treated with talazoparib, a strong PARP inhibitor. After signing informed consent, metastatic breast cancer patients will undergo an ultrasound (or CT-) guided biopsy in order to obtain at least two biopsies from a metastatic lesion to determine the HR status by the RECAP test and a blood withdrawal for ctDNA isolation. HR proficient (HRP) patients will receive anti-tumor therapy (non study drug) on discretion of their treating physician; only the response on treatment will be registered. Approximately 30% of screened patients will have an HRD tumor and thus will be eligible to start talazoparib monotherapy until PD or unacceptable side effects. The primary endpoint is PFS at four months. Additional endpoints will include overall response rate and overall survival. Upon progression, patients will be kindly asked for consent to perform another biopsy (optional) and blood withdrawal in order to prove reversibility of the RECAP test outcome (from HRD to HRP) and explore potential mechanisms of resistance (both in tissue and ctDNA).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713GZ
        • Recruiting
        • Groningen University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • M Jalving, MD, PhD
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2333ZA
        • Recruiting
        • Leiden University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • J R Kroep, MD, PhD
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Agnes Jager, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • Locally advanced breast cancer without options for treatment with curative intent or metastatic breast cancer
  • Objective progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST within 4 months prior to study entry

  • The breast cancer must be either

    • high grade (Bloom & Richardson grade 3) ER positive (>10%) and HER2 negative primary breast cancer, or
    • triple negative (ER<10%, PR<10% and HER2 negative), or

    • any Bloom & Richardson grading and receptor status and also

      • at least one metastatic lesion must have a proven HRD phenotype based on a RECAP test not treated with anticancer therapy thereafter or
      • the patient must have a proven germline or somatic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation The Bloom & Richardson grading is always based on the primary tumor. The receptor status can be based on the primary tumor or a metastatic lesion whichever comes latest.
  • The site of the metastatic lesion (or primary tumor in case it is still in situ) should be easily amendable for biopsy. NB lung metastases (high risk of hemato/pneumo-thorax) and bone metastases (not suitable for RECAP test because calcifications interfere with experimental procedures) are excluded. The local guidelines will be used for stopping and r estarting of anticoagulation. Bilirubin <1.5 ULN (except elevated bilirubin due to Gilbert's disease or a similar syndrome involving slow conjugation of bilirubin) and both AST and ALT <5x ULN in case a liver biopsy is planned.
  • The tumor must be HRD, defined as HRD identified by the RECAP test determined just before the start of potential Talazoparib treatment within this study (also in case a proven germline BRCA1/2 mutation is present).
  • Maximum of four prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease; Patients who received platinum compounds are eligible if they have had at least a progression free interval of four months.
  • Measurable or evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (appendix 2)
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL (6,2 mmol/L) and ANC of ≥ 1.5 x 109 /L
  • Platelets >100 x 10e9/L
  • Hepatic function as defined by total serum bilirubin ≤ 1. 5 x ULN (except elevated bilirubin due to Gilbert's disease or a similar syndrome involving slow conjugation of bilirubin), ASAT and ALAT < 3 x ULN or <5 x ULN in case of liver metastasis
  • Adequate renal function as defined by either serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min (by Cockcroft-Gault formula)
  • Negative pregnancy test (urine/serum) for female patients with childbearing potential
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any psychological condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol
  • Any treatment with investigational antitumor drugs within 28 days prior to receiving the first dose of investigational treatment; or within 21 days for standard chemotherapy; or within 14 days for weekly scheduled chemotherapeutic regimens or endocrine therapy
  • Radiotherapy within the last four weeks prior to receiving the first dose of investigational treatment; except 1 or 2 x 8 Gy for pain palliation, then seven days interval after the last radiation should be maintained
  • Known persistent (>4 weeks) ≥ Grade 2 toxicity from prior cancer therapy (except for alopecia grade 2)
  • Symptomatic brain or leptomeningeal metastases. Patients completely free of symptoms and without corticosteroids for at least four weeks after adequate treatment by resection and/or irradiation could be eligible (consult PI).
  • Women who have a positive pregnancy test (urine/serum) and/or who are breastfeeding
  • Unreliable contraceptive methods. Women and men enrolled in this trial must agree to use a reliable contraceptive method throughout the study (adequate contraceptive methods are: intra-uterine devices or systems, condom or other barrier contraceptive measures, sterilization and true abstinence)
  • Concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors or inducers or BCRP inhibitors (see Appendix A)
  • Any known history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
  • Uncontrolled infectious disease (such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus HIV-1 or HIV-2 infection) or known active hepatitis B or C
  • Recent myocardial infarction (< six months) or unstable angina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Talazoparib

Talazoparib Capsule, oral use

1 mg per day until PD or unacceptable toxicity
Drug: Talazoparib
Talazoparib is administered daily as single agent, 1 mg orally until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease.
Other Names:
  • Talazoparib 1 MG Oral Capsule [Talzenna]

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with PFS at 4 months
Time Frame: Baseline. During the intervention: every 2 cycles (each cycle is 28 days), preferably within 7 days before the start of every uneven cycle. Follow-up until PD, unacceptable toxicity or death. Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
The percentage of patients with advanced HRD breast cancer with PFS of 4 months or longer on talazoparib monotherapy. Disease assessment is performed by CT chest-abdomen per RECIST v 1.1.
Baseline. During the intervention: every 2 cycles (each cycle is 28 days), preferably within 7 days before the start of every uneven cycle. Follow-up until PD, unacceptable toxicity or death. Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Baseline. During the intervention: every 2 cycles (each cycle is 28 days), preferably within 7 days before the start of every uneven cycle. Follow-up until PD, unacceptable toxicity or death. Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
The proportion of patients whose confirmed best overall response is either a PR or CR based upon investigator assessment per standard RECIST v1.1. Disease assessment is performed by CT chest-abdomen.
Baseline. During the intervention: every 2 cycles (each cycle is 28 days), preferably within 7 days before the start of every uneven cycle. Follow-up until PD, unacceptable toxicity or death. Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Time from first administration of talazoparib to time of death due to any cause. Follow-up on survival at least every 3 months for year 1, every 6 months for year 2 and 3 and annually until death. Until all patients have reached PFS (end of study).
OS of patients with advanced HRD breast cancer treated with talazoparib
Time from first administration of talazoparib to time of death due to any cause. Follow-up on survival at least every 3 months for year 1, every 6 months for year 2 and 3 and annually until death. Until all patients have reached PFS (end of study).

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Molecular aberrations in HR genes
Time Frame: A second biopsy at pre-screening
Exploring differences in molecular aberrations in HR genes (e.g. BRCA1/2, PALB2). Based on between HRD tumors that respond and those that do not respond to talazoparib. Based on DNA analyses on snap-frozen biopsy taken at pre-screening.
A second biopsy at pre-screening
PFS rate in relation to BRCA1/2 aberrations
Time Frame: A second biopsy at pre-screening
PFS rate of non-BRCA1/2 or BRCA1 promoter methylated HRD tumors compared to PFS rate of BRCA1/2 mutated HRD tumors. Based on DNA analysis on snap-frozen biopsy taken at pre-screening.
A second biopsy at pre-screening
Reversion of HRD phenotype
Time Frame: A second biopsy at pre-screening and optional: a biopsy at PD (immediately after the intervention). Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
Exploring mechanisms of reversion of the HRD phenotype by comparing paired biopsies before treatment and upon progression on talazoparib.
A second biopsy at pre-screening and optional: a biopsy at PD (immediately after the intervention). Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
Talazoparib resistance mechanisms in ctDNA
Time Frame: Blood samples will be taken at baseline and at PD (immediately after the intervention). Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).
Elucidating resistance mechanisms by sequencing a DNA repair gene panel on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) pretreatment and at disease progression.
Blood samples will be taken at baseline and at PD (immediately after the intervention). Until all patients have reached PFS endpoint (end of study).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Erasmus Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Medical Center Groningen
Leiden University Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Agnes Jager, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MEC 19-0070
  • 2018-002914-10 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings