Effects of Perturbation Therapy and Trunk Control Training
Comparative Effects of Perturbation and Trunk Control Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Muhammad Asif Javed, MS
- Phone Number: 03224209422
- Email: a.javed@riphah.edu.pk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: IMRAN AMJAD, PhD
- Phone Number: 9233224390125
- Email: IMRAN.AMJAD@RIPHAH.EDU.PK
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Imran Amjad
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Kids that suffer from cerebral palsy.
- Ages span from 5 to 10 years.
- Both males and females were represented.
- During the preceding half-year, there was no orthopedic surgery or spasticity-reduction intervention.
- No significant lower limb muscular contraction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals suffering from sensory, proprioceptive, cognitive, and perceptual impairments, as well as those with contractures.
- Any neurological disease that impairs balance, including orthopedic disorders
- Individual experiencing seizures and has undergone any prior surgical treatments.
- Uncorrected visual issues
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Perturbation Therapy
Perturbation Therapy will be given to this group.
|
The applicants were instructed to perform various exercises, including rotating their trunks, tossing a ball, and maintaining pelvis neutrality.
They were also asked to reach the toy sideways with one hand.
The 6-week intervention was conducted four days a week for 60 minutes each day, focusing on trunk rotation, standing, tossing, and catching the ball in various directions.
The training sessions lasted for 20 minutes each.
|
|
Active Comparator: Trunk Control Therapy
Trunk control activities will be given to this group.
|
For the duration of each session, the manual pushes and pulls were administered around once per minute and lasted for 20 minutes.
A platform that can be moved in four directions.Choosing to step and stroll when there is an outside disturbance.
When routine motions such as sit-to-stand transitions, disruptions are applied when standing, walking, or other activities.
Training with continuous disruptions simulates scenarios such as uneven terrain.
Both rope and cable excursions are above ground and last for 20 minutes.
Briefly explain the platform to the participants.
Asked the participants to push the torso and waist against the wall during the session.
Emerging barriers during training sessions like small obstacles (e.g.
pair of bricks) then Lean the participants with the support of the therapist and let them go.
Asked them to Step on a mushy or slick surface in session for 20 minutes.
Each intervention session took place for 60 minutes per day four days of week for 6 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pediatric Berg balance scale (PBBS)
Time Frame: 6weeks
|
BBS is 14 Item rating 5-point ordinal Scale, used to evaluate the balance in elderly population and other neurological conditions.
It is easy to administer and doesn't require specialized training and takes 15- 20 mins.
The maximum scoring in BBS is 56.
|
6weeks
|
|
Functional Independent Measures (FIM
Time Frame: 6weeks
|
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) provides a seven level ordinal scale for measuring functional performance on 18 activities considered essential for daily living.
In routine practice, the scores on the individual activities are usually summed giving a total FIM score that ranges from 18 to 126.
|
6weeks
|
|
Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT)
Time Frame: 6weeks
|
It is prognostic test to assess mobility and to identify the individuals with a risk of fall.
TUG is time performance of getting up from chair, walking 3 m, turning around and walking back to sit down again.
Timed Up and Go test is recommended by American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatric Society for screening risk of falls.
An older who takes more than 12 seconds to complete the TUG is at the highest risk for falling
|
6weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zirwa Afzal, MS*, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/RCR&AHS/23/0737
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.