Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Emotion Regulation in Bipolar Disorder

July 15, 2026 updated by: Kristen K. Ellard, Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Targeting Emotion Regulation in Bipolar Disorder With Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation: A Mechanistic Study

The objective of this study protocol is to test whether intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS-TMS) to the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) can strengthen functional connectivity with a key region in emotion regulation (ER) neurocircuitry (anterior insula, AI) and improve performance on ER-related tasks in patients with bipolar disorder. Individual IPL sites for stimulation will be identified through baseline, pre-TMS functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Patient-specific IPL subregions showing positive functional connectivity with the anterior insula and falling within the patient-specific frontoparietal control network will be used as individualized target sites for TMS stimulation. Patients will be randomized to receive 24 sessions of active versus sham iTBS to patient-specific IPL targets (6 sessions/day, 4 days, 43,200 pulses total). Post-iTBS resting-state and task-based fMRI scans will be acquired 3 days after the final day of iTBS administration (Day 4) following identical procedures as baseline. Effects of iTBS-TMS on ER will be evaluated by comparing pre-TMS versus post-TMS functional connectivity and behavior during performance on ER tasks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The specific goal of this mechanistic study is to test whether targeted engagement of the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) using a rapid and robust form of transcranial magnetic stimulation, accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), will increase emotion regulation (ER) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Specifically, the Investigators will experimentally test whether stimulation the IPL with aiTBS can strengthen functional neurocircuitry supporting healthy ER, as indexed by increased IPL and anterior insula (AI) functional connectivity and improved performance on ER-related behavioral tasks. The Investigators will use computer tasks that measure ER and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine changes in brain function and behavior following real versus sham aiTBS in individuals with BD. Patients will be randomized to either active or sham aiTBS and will receive 6 sessions of high dose (1800 pulses) iTBS per day over a course of 4 days (24 sessions total). Patients will be scanned at baseline and 3 days after Day 4 of aiTBS in order to examine ER-related neuroplastic effects of IPL stimulation. To increase the potential clinical utility of findings from this study, the Investigators will examine the effects of aiTBS to the IPL in a sample of BD patients who are currently depressed, the most common and chronic mood state in this population. Following informed consent, all participants will complete a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing ER and will complete a computer-based ER task (Balloon Analog Risk Task; BART). Participants will then complete a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning session consisting of (1) structural, (2) resting state, and (3) task-based (Affective Multisource Interference Task; MSIT-IAPS) scans. Participants will then be randomized to either Active (n=60, 30 per site) or Sham (N=60, 30 per site) aiTBS conditions in a double-blind design. Both Active and Sham procedures will consist of 4 days of iTBS (6 sessions/day). Participants will repeat the BART computer-based task and fMRI scanning procedures (structural, resting state, MSIT-IAPS in scanner task) within 3 days after Day 4 stimulation to measure the neuroplastic effects of aiTBS. The Investigators propose to recruit 136 individuals with a diagnosis of BD and a current depressed episode. The study will have 68 per each of the two groups (Active, Sham) at baseline and anticipate approximately 10% loss to attrition by post aiTBS. As the study has a single primary outcome (aiTBS-induced changes in IPL-AI functional connectivity), the Investigators use an alpha-level (Type 1 error rate) of 0.05. In preliminary data (n=8), the Investigators observed an increase in IPL-AI functional connectivity from 0.04 (SD=0.17) to 0.15 (SD=0.22), with correlation of 0.80 after a single day of 10 sessions active iTBS, corresponding to an effect size of Cohen's d=0.57. The Investigators anticipate a small "placebo" effect in the TBS group, of about d=0.10, and conservatively assume a correlation of 0.65, rather than the 0.80 seen in the pilot study. With these assumptions, the study has 80% power for an active aiTBS effect of 0.45, relative to sham aiTBS. The Investigators note that these effect size estimates are based on a much smaller dose of iTBS than the dose to be administered in the proposed study (18,000 pulses versus 43,200 pulses) - thus, it is plausible that the effect sizes seen in the study will be larger than those in the pilot data. See "Statistical Design and Power" for full details of data analysis plan.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
136

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Recruiting
        • Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kristen K Ellard, PhD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-4283(215) 573-4229

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals of all genders
  2. ages 24-65
  3. Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-5) defined diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder (BD); assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) version 7.0.2.
  4. Current depressive episode, assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥20,
  5. Ability to provide informed consent and verifiable contact information, including current psychiatric treatment provider
  6. Stable medication regimen for at least one month, which must include a mood stabilizer

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current mania/hypomania assessed by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS > 12)
  2. rapid-cycling bipolar illness, defined as >4 episodes per year, indicating increased risk of switch to mania
  3. current active suicidality (suicidal ideation with intent or plan), as assessed by a score >4 on the MADRS item #10
  4. current substance use disorder for the past 6 months; substance use disorder in remission permitted
  5. history of psychosis
  6. dementia or other major neurological disorders, as assessed by a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score <24 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score <26
  7. medical illness or non-psychiatric medical treatment that would likely interfere with study participation
  8. contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including the presence of metallic implants that would interfere with safety (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, metal plates, non-removable body piercings, etc.), history of seizure disorder, history of head trauma
  9. a clinical course of a neuromodulatory therapy (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy) within the past 6 months
  10. current use of benzodiazepines, which can interfere with iTBS stimulation
  11. current pregnancy, to limit potential risks to an unborn child

Other: Given that >86% of BD patients experience lifetime comorbid anxiety, co-occurring anxiety disorders will be allowable for inclusion, thus providing a more representative sample of bipolar patients who typically present at our Clinics for treatment. Comorbid anxiety disorders are not a criteria for inclusion or exclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
The Active intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) arm will receive active iTBS applied to the inferior parietal lobule (IPL)
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive tool for modulating patterns of brain activation and circuit connectivity. It uses electromagnetic pulses to induce electric currents over the cortex that serve to depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons, thereby changing patterns of synaptic activity. This study uses intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), an efficient TMS protocol that uses high frequency (50Hz) triplets of TMS given every 200 milliseconds (i.e. at 5 Hz).
Placebo Comparator: Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
The Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) arm will receive sham iTBS applied to the inferior parietal lobule (IPL)
Device: Sham (placebo) TMS
Sham stimulation works by blocking the magnetic field with an internal spacer on the sham side of the TMS coil, allowing the operator to place the coil surface against the scalp. A brief electric pulse calibrated to the stimulator output is delivered to the scalp simultaneous to the TMS pulse to mimic the scalp sensation during the sham condition. 75 Importantly, the electric pulse is calibrated to the stimulator output to ensure a realistic sham condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series (functional connectivity)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)
Primary outcome will be changes in the correlated time series between brain regions (inferior parietal lobule and anterior insula) from baseline to post intervention
Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Affective Multisource Interference Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)
Secondary outcome will be changes in reaction time responses to an affective interference task
Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)
Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)
Secondary outcome will be changes in number of button presses in response to a risk versus reward task
Baseline, 1-3 days post 4-day intervention (up to 4 weeks post Baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kristen K Ellard, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024P000348

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings