Gut Microbiota, Mitochondrial Function and Metabolic Health in Obesity

February 25, 2025 updated by: Celia Bañuls

Effect of a Very Low-calorie Diet on Microbiota, Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory and Metabolomic Profile in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obese Subjects

It has been suggested that individuals with the condition known as metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) may not have the same increased risk of developing metabolic abnormalities as their non-metabolically healthy counterparts. In addition, to date, the identification of metabolic biomarkers and microbiota underlying the MHO state is limited. In this study, our goal is to provide insight into the underlying metabolic pathways affected by obesity. To achieve this, we will compare the metabolic profile, inflammatory parameters and mitochondrial function, as well as metabolomic analysis and differential expression of microbiota in obese patients categorized as metabolically healthy vs. non healthy. In parallel, the effect of a hypocaloric diet on obese subjects' metabolism and microbiota will be assessed to approve their use in the treatment of said disorder. Specifically, we propose an observational, clinical-basic, comparative and interventional study in a population of 80 obese (BMI>35 kg/m2) patients clustered in two groups according to the presence or absence of altered metabolism (altered fasting glycemia, hypertension, atherogenic dyslipidemia). Anthropometric and clinical variables and biological samples (serum, plasma, peripheral blood cells and feces) will be collected for the determination of biochemical parameters (glucose, lipid and hormonal profile by enzymatic techniques) and protein-based peripheral biomarkers of mitochondrial function [total and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial membrane potential, glutathione levels by static cytometry], markers of mitochondrial dynamics [Mitofusin 1 (MFN1), Mitofusin 2 (MFN2), Mitochondrial fision protein 1 (FIS1) and Dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) by RT-PCR and Western Blot], markers of inflammation [Interleukin 6 (IL6), Tumoral necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), IL1b, adiponectin, resistin, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), caspase 1 and NLRP3 by Western Blot and technology XMAP), metabolomic assay (NMR spectroscopy and PLS-DA), as well as gut microbiota content and diversity (16S rRNA, MiSeq sequencing). Finally, we will evaluate the effect of a dietary weight loss intervention on these biomarkers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
109

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Valencia, Spain, 46020
        • FISABIO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with BMI≥30kg/m2, with at least 5 years of diagnosed obesity evolution.
  • Patients have had stable body weight (±2 kg) during the 3 months prior to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with acute or chronic inflammatory diseases, neoplasic disease, secondary causes of obesity (uncontrolled hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome), and established liver and kidney failure (according to transaminase levels ±2 SD of the mean and estimated glomerular filtration rate using the CKD-EPI formula >60) will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Very low-calorie diet Intervention
Dietary supplement: very low-calorie diet
Subjects undergo two cycles of a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) for 6 weeks each, alternating with a hypocaloric diet (12 weeks). The dietetic intervention consists of a VLCD using a liquid formula (Optisource Plus, Nestlé S.A., Vevey, Switzerland), providing 52.8 g protein, 75.0 g carbohydrates, 13.5 g fat, 11.4 g fiber, and essential vitamins and minerals based on Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA). This formula supplies 2738 kJ/day (654 kcal/day), replacing the participants' three daily meals. Following this and before the second VLCD cycle, a dietician performs an individualized nutritional assessment to calculate the resting energy expenditure, and personalized hypocaloric diets were prepared, reducing 500 kcal for each individual on their daily caloric expenditure, maintaining the recommended intake of each of the macronutrients (55% carbohydrates, 30% fats and 15% proteins) for 12-weeks.
Other Names:
  • VLCD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analyze the changes in the diversity of the intestinal microbiota after dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 5 years
To assess the alpha-diversity of the intestinal microbiota, defined as the average diversity of species in an ecosystem, the Shannon index will be used. The results are interpreted as follows: values less than 2 are considered low in diversity and values greater than 3 are high in species diversity.
5 years
Evaluate the differences in the diversity of the intestinal microbiota depending on whether patients present metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) or metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO).
Time Frame: 5 years
To asses the differences in alpha-diversity of the intestinal microbiota in both groups, it will be evaluated whether there are significant differences between the Shannon indices of the two groups. The classification of patients between MHO and MUHO will be carried out using the following criteria: MUHO will be considered when patients with obesity present ≥2 metabolic abnormalities, and MHO with ≤1 metabolic abnormalities; the following cardiovascular risk factors are considered metabolic abnormalities: elevated blood pressure (defined as either SBP ≥130 mm Hg, DBP ≥85 mm Hg, or treatment with antihypertensive medications), elevated triglycerides (as fasting triglyceride concentration ≥1.7 mmol/l), low HDL-C levels (defined as HDL-C <1.04 mmol/l, in men, <1.29 mmol/l/l in women, or treatment with lipid-lowering medications), dysglycemia (fasting plasma glucose 5.6 to 6.9 mmol/l, and/or and insulin resistance as HOMA-IR >3.8).
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate significant changes in body fat mass percentage after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
Percentage of body fat mass will be measured by bioelectrical impedance. It is considered to be high when ≥25% in men and ≥30% in women. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Assess significant changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as an inflammatory parameter after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
Participants will be considered to have achieved an improvement in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels if they normalize its value (normality values defined between 0 and 1.69mg/dl).
2 years
Evaluate significant changes in C3 protein as an inflammatory parameter after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
Participants will be considered to have achieved an improvement in C3 protein if they normalize its value (normality values defined between 81 and 157mg/dl).
2 years
Assess significant changes in plasmatic homocysteine as an inflammatory parameter after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
Participants will be considered to have achieved an improvement in plasmatic homocysteine if they normalize its value (normality values defined between 5 and 15µmol/L).
2 years
Evaluate significant changes in interleukin 1-beta (IL-1B) levels as a pro-inflammatory molecule after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
IL-1B levels will be measured using the Luminex® 200 analyzer system. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Evaluate significant changes in interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels as a pro-inflammatory molecule after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
IL-6 levels will be measured using the Luminex® 200 analyzer system. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Evaluate significant changes in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels as a pro-inflammatory molecule after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
TNF-alpha levels will be measured using the Luminex® 200 analyzer system. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Assess significant changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
Superoxide dismutase levels will be measured using the Luminex® 200 analyzer system. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Analyze the significant differences between metabolomic profile before and after the dietetic intervention.
Time Frame: 2 years
NMR spectra will be used to obtain spectra from serum samples from the cohort. In order to evaluate if there will be significant differences after the dietetic intervention, a PLS-DA model for discrimination between basal and post intervention levels will be performed. Scores plots will be calculated with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Evaluate if there is a significant reduction after the dietetic intervention in total ROS levels.
Time Frame: 2 years
Total ROS levels will be assessed by a flow cytometry assay. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Assess if there is a significant reduction after the dietetic intervention in glutathione levels.
Time Frame: 2 years
Total glutathione levels will be assessed by a flow cytometry assay. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Analyze if there is a significant change after the dietetic intervention in total free radicals and superoxide levels.
Time Frame: 2 years
Total free radicals and superoxide content will be assessed by a flow cytometry assay. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Analyze if there is a significant reduction after the dietetic intervention in mitochondrial ROS production.
Time Frame: 2 years
Mitochondrial ROS production will be assessed by a flow cytometry assay. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Evaluate if there is a significant improvement after the dietetic intervention in mitochondrial membrane potential.
Time Frame: 2 years
Mitochondrial membrane potential will be assessed by a flow cytometry assay. A significant improvement will be considered when notable differences are observed in the mean values between groups measured through p-value (<0.05) with a 95% confidence interval.
2 years
Analyze the proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 5 years
Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight after the dietetic intervention (6 months).
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Celia Bañuls

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PI18/00932

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings