Influence of Tumour and Patient's Related Factors on the Response to Medical Treatments in Well Differentiated GEP-NENs (FARINET)

January 14, 2026 updated by: Gabriele Capurso, IRCCS San Raffaele
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent the most common NeuroEndocrin Neoplasms (NEN) site, comprising 55-70% of all NENs, and they are extremely heterogeneous diseases in terms of clinical presentation and aggressiveness. In recent years there has been a significant increase in the incidence of such neoplasms, partially due to incidental findings of small indolent lesions. However, the behavior of GEP- NEN is variable and mainly dictated by some factors as age, sex, histologic grade, primary site, and stage at diagnosis1. As for grade which is defined by the proliferative activity as measured by mitotic count or ki67 staining, some 75% of neoplasms fall into the G1 grading category, 15% into the G2 category, and 10% into the G3 category. The probability of developing metastases is directly correlated with grading. In addition, the grading of GEP-NENs is also correlated with the type of differentiation of the neoplasm (well differentiated or poorly differentiated). Managing the complexity of this type of neoplasm has made it necessary to stratify patients into progression risk classes. The therapeutic approach is accordingly defined, and may include different treatments (surgery, loco-regional, targeted therapies, chemotherapies,...). Among treatments, the most widely used for patients with well-differentiated NENs are somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapies, and the combination of oral capecitabine and temozolomide. Systemic intravenous chemotherapy is instead employed in a subset of G3 neoplasms, especially if poorly differentiated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This is an observational retrospective multicentric cohort study. The primary outcome of the study is the global Progression-free survival (PFS) adjusted for the risk factors considered. In a subgroup of patients only previously enrolled in San Raffaele Hospital that were included in the BIO-PANCREAS study (approval number INT/96/2021, a local monocentric protocol in which blood and/or Endoscopic UltraSound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) derived samples are collected for further molecular analyses), the trascriptome signature will also be investigated as potential biomarker of disease behavior. Retrospective enrolment will be performed from January 2015 to March 2023. As for the primary aim, patients' and tumours' related variables will be investigated as explanatory variables for the outcome "time to progression", hence this analysis will allow a response to the clinical question of whether these factors have an influence on tumour behavior under treatment. As for the subgroup analysis (analysis of trascriptome signatures), again, this will be investigated to test whether there is a signature able to discriminate different responses to treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gabriele Capurso, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matteo Tacelli, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with well differentiated GEP-NENs

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18
  • Well-differentiated, localized (but not suitable for surgical treatment) or advanced (locally or with distant metastasis) GEP-NENs
  • availability of data on site of primary tumor, stage of the, date of diagnosis

  • treated with one (or more) of the following therapies:

    • Somatostatin analogs

      • G1 or G2 (Ki67 <10%) GEP-NENs
      • Treated for at least 6 months
      • first-line therapy (or as second-line after surgery in patients with residual disease or recurrence after surgical resection)

    • Sunitinib/Everolimus

      • G1/G2 GEP-NENs
      • Treated for at least 6 months
      • first- or second-line therapy

    • Capecitabine-Temozolomide (CAP-TEM)

      • G2 or G3 (Ki67 < 55%) GEP-NENs
      • first-, second-, or third-line therapy
      • Treated for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18aa
  • Patients concomitantly treated with loco-regional treatments
  • Patients previously treated with radioligand therapy
  • Patients with need of CAP-TEM dose reduction of more than 33% for at least 3 administrations
  • NENs of unknown primitivity (including patients with biopsy on secondary lesion compatible with metastasis from GEP-NEN, but with occult primary neoplasm)
  • Patients with Mixed NENs (MiNENs)
  • Patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Global pfs adjusted for the risk factors considered
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS San Raffaele

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gabriele Capurso, PhD, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FARINET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings