RESET-MG: A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CABA-201 in Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

August 12, 2026 updated by: Cabaletta Bio

RESET-MG: A Phase 1/2, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous CD19-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CABA-201) in Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

RESET-MG: A Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CABA-201 in Participants with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibody responses that cause defective transmission of signals at the neuromuscular junction, resulting in a distinctive pattern of weakness. Patients with generalized MG (gMG) typically experience symptoms associated with ocular disease in addition to weakness of many other voluntary muscle groups, including extremity, bulbar, and respiratory muscles. MG is considered a classic example of a B-cell mediated autoimmune disease. Currently, there are no curative treatments for MG. This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an investigational cell therapy, CABA-201, that can be given to patients with gMG. A single dose of CABA-201 in combination with cyclophosphamide (CY) and fludarabine (FLU) will be evaluated. In addition, escalating doses of CABA-201 will be evaluated in patients without CY and FLU preconditioning.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Irvine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ali Habib, MD
        • Contact:
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Recruiting
        • UC Davis, Department of Neurology
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Richman, MD
        • Contact:
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Min Kang, MD
    • Colorado
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic Florida
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Jaimin Shah, MD
        • Contact:
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Arjun Seth, MD
        • Contact:
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Recruiting
        • University of Kansas Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mazen Dimachkie, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pushpa Narayanaswami, MD
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • Recruiting
        • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Margaret A. Owegi, DO
        • Contact:
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic - Rochester
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elie Naddaf, M.D.
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Recruiting
        • University of Rochester Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Alexis Lizarraga, MD, MS
        • Contact:
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health & Science University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Nizar Chahin, M.D.
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Sheetal Shroff, MD
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Uday Popat, MD
        • Contact:
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor College of Medicine Neurology Department
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Milvia Pleitez, MD
        • Contact:
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 and ≤70 years of age
  • Diagnosis of MG with generalized muscle weakness meeting criteria as defined by the MGFA class II, III , IVa, and IVb.
  • Diagnosis of seropositive (autoantibodies AChR, MuSK and/or LRP4) or seronegative MG

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to leukapheresis
  • History of anaphylactic or severe systemic reaction to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide or any of their metabolites
  • Active infection requiring medical intervention at screening
  • Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, psychiatric, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease, including severe and uncontrolled infections, such as sepsis and opportunistic infections.
  • Concomitant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study, interfere with the assessment of the effects or safety of the investigational product or with the study procedures
  • Significant lung or cardiac impairment
  • Prior solid organ (heart, liver, kidney, lung) transplant or hematopoietic cell transplant

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CABA-201
AChR Antibody-Positive Cohort or AChR Antibody-Negative Cohort
Biological: CABA-201
Single intravenous infusion of CABA-201 at a single dose level following preconditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide
Biological: CABA-201
Single intravenous infusion of CABA-201 at escalating dose levels without preconditioning
Experimental: CABA-201, No Preconditioning
Infusion of CABA-201 with no preconditioning in subjects with gMG
Biological: CABA-201
Single intravenous infusion of CABA-201 at a single dose level following preconditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide
Biological: CABA-201
Single intravenous infusion of CABA-201 at escalating dose levels without preconditioning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after CABA-201 infusion
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal result of an investigation), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. The term AE is used to include both serious and non-serious AEs.
Up to 28 days after CABA-201 infusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To characterize the pharmacodynamics (PD)
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
Levels of B cells in the blood
Up to 156 weeks
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK)
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
Levels of CABA-201-positive T cells in the blood
Up to 156 weeks
To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal result of an investigation), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. The term AE is used to include both serious and non-serious AEs.
Up to 156 weeks
To evaluate disease-related biomarkers
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
Levels of MG-specific autoantibodies in the serum
Up to 156 weeks
To evaluate efficacy by change in Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score over time.
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
The MG-ADL scale is a validated instrument administered by a qualified assessor with 8 areas of activities of daily living as reported by patients: talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, ability to brush teeth or comb hair, ability to rise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop. In each area, the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The total score is the sum of all subscores.
Up to 156 weeks
To evaluate efficacy by change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score over time.
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
The QMG score is a 13-item scale conducted by a qualified assessor to evaluate disease severity in patients with MG. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no myasthenic findings) to 39 (maximum myasthenic deficits).
Up to 156 weeks
To evaluate efficacy by change in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) score over time.
Time Frame: Up to 156 weeks
The MGC scale is a physician-reported instrument for the assessment of MG patients' symptoms and impairments. It includes 10 domains, and the total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 50 (most severe).
Up to 156 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cabaletta Bio

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Medical Director, Cabaletta Bio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAB-201-004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings