ATRX/DAXX in EUS-FNB Specimens of Pan-NETs (FORESEE)

January 12, 2026 updated by: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Association Between Endoscopic Ultrasound Based Preoperative ATRX/DAXX Immunohistochemistry Expression and Prognosis of Sporadic, Non-FunctiOnal pancREatic Neuroendocrine tumorS: a prospEctivE Cohort Study

P-NENs are classified as functional (F-) or non-functional (NF-) depending on the presence or absence of a clinical hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. Moreover, the WHO 2017 classification of pNENs distinguishes between well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs). pNETs are then divided according to a grading scheme based on Ki67 index in pNETs-G1 (Ki67 index ≤3%) and pNETs-G2 (Ki67 index between 4% and 20%). pNECs are all G3, with a Ki67 index >20%. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) demonstrated safe and effective preoperative grading based on the Ki-67 proliferative index. However, downstaging rate is not neglectable, reaching 15% in a recent metanalysis. Moreover, recent whole-exome and whole genome sequencing studies revealed that the mutually exclusive inactivating mutations in death domain-associated protein (DAXX) and/or in α-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX) chromatin remodeling genes are associated with more aggressive disease. In a retrospective study, the investigators recently evaluated the correspondence of DAXX/ATRX expression on 41 EUS-FNB samples with corresponding surgical specimens demonstrating a 95.1% (almost perfect agreement, κ = 0.828; p < 0.001) and 92.7% (substantial agreement, κ = 0.626; p < 0.001) concordance for DAXX and ATRX expression, respectively. This study aims to evaluate the potential clinical/prognostic role of DAXX/ATRX expression as implementation of the currently used Ki67-based grading, evaluated on EUS-FNB samples in a prospective cohort of patients with NF-pNETs

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Verona, Italy
        • University Hospital of Verona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Cyto/histologic diagnosis of pNETs
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Functional pNETs
  • Multiple pancreatic nodules
  • Diagnosis of MEN-1 or Von-Hippel Lindau
  • Mixed types (e.g., mixed neuroendocrine-acinar/adenocarcinoma) or neuroendocrine carcinomas
  • Predominantly cystic lesions (more than 50% of the volume).
  • Metastatic tumors at the time of diagnosis
  • Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with co-fact or fresh frozen plasma
  • Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued
  • INR >1.5 or platelet count <50.000
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Failure to sign the patient's or closest relative's informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ATRX/DAXX loss
The "positive" group including patients with loss of DAXX or ATRX expression evaluated on immunohistochemistry on endoscopic ultrasound biopsy specimens
Diagnostic test: ATRX/DAXX immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry will be performed using an Autostainer Leica (Leica Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Four μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections will be immunostained with antibodies for Cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (AE1-AE3, 1:100 dilution, Novocastra/United Kingdom) Chromogranin A (DAK-A3, 1:2500, Dako/Denmark), and Synaptophysin (27G12, 1:100, Novocastra), Ki67 (MIB1, 1:100, Dako/Denmark), ATRX (1:400, Sigma-Aldrich), DAXX (1:200, Sigma-Aldrich). After antigen retrieval, immunostaining will be performed in an automated Bond instrument (Vision-Biosystem, Leica, Milan, Italy) using a sensitive peroxidase-based 'Bond polymer Refine' detection system.
ATRX/DAXX preserved
The "negative" group including those with preserved DAXX and ATRX expression evaluated on immunohistochemistry on endoscopic ultrasound biopsy specimens
Diagnostic test: ATRX/DAXX immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry will be performed using an Autostainer Leica (Leica Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Four μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections will be immunostained with antibodies for Cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (AE1-AE3, 1:100 dilution, Novocastra/United Kingdom) Chromogranin A (DAK-A3, 1:2500, Dako/Denmark), and Synaptophysin (27G12, 1:100, Novocastra), Ki67 (MIB1, 1:100, Dako/Denmark), ATRX (1:400, Sigma-Aldrich), DAXX (1:200, Sigma-Aldrich). After antigen retrieval, immunostaining will be performed in an automated Bond instrument (Vision-Biosystem, Leica, Milan, Italy) using a sensitive peroxidase-based 'Bond polymer Refine' detection system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ATRX/DAXX loss-tumor aggressiveness association
Time Frame: 18 months
To assess the association between ATRX/DAXX loss of expression assessed on endoscopic ultrasound biopsy specimens and pathological features indicative of tumor aggressiveness evaluated on surgical pathology
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ki-67 concordance
Time Frame: 18 months
To evaluate the concordance rate of Ki67-based tumor grade between endoscopic ultrasound biopsy samples and surgical specimens.
18 months
DAXX/ATRX concordance
Time Frame: 18 months
To evaluate the concordance rate of DAXX/ATRX expression between endoscopic ultrasound biopsy samples and surgical specimens
18 months
Ki-67-tumor aggressiveness association
Time Frame: 18 months
To assess the association between preoperative Ki67-based grade 2/3 on endoscopic ultrasound samples and pathological features indicative of tumor aggressiveness evaluated on surgical pathology
18 months
Preoperative prognosis assessment
Time Frame: 60 months
To evaluate the association between DAXX/ATRX expression on endoscopic ultrasound biopsy samples, Ki67-based grade 2/3 on endoscopic ultrasound biopsy samples, and tumor size on endoscopic ultrasound and progression-free survival and relapse-free survival.
60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FORESEE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings