Post-CA Neuroprotection With Magnesium

April 1, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Neuroprotection Following Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Control Trial of Magnesium

The purpose of this pilot interventional study is to collect preliminary data on administering magnesium sulfate as a neuroprotective medication in patients who achieved Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) following Cardiac Arrest (CA). The primary aims are to assess the feasibility and safety of administering magnesium and measure serum markers of neuronal injury at prespecified time points in the post-cardiac arrest period. Because this is a pilot study with a limited sample size, the primary objective is to evaluate the precision and stability of the collected measures to inform the design and formal analysis in a larger trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
178

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented post-cardiac arrest patient with Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) achieved <2 hours prior to recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years or > 85 years
  • Traumatic cardiac arrests
  • Unsustained ROSC (<20 minutes)
  • Patient who is responsive/able to follow motor commands within 1 hour of achieving ROSC
  • Plan for withdrawal of life support within 72 hours of ROSC
  • Known pregnant women at the time of the cardiac arrest
  • Known prisoners at the time of the cardiac arrest
  • Subjects who have a medical o social condition that would make them inappropriate for the study based on the PI's or clinical team judgement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Magnesium Sulfate
Treatment of initial magnesium sulfate bolus followed by a continuous drip.
Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
4 g of magnesium sulfate intravenously within 2 hours of Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC), followed by a continuous drip (16 g) over 24 hours
Placebo Comparator: Saline solution
Treatment of equivalent volume of normal saline.
Drug: Saline
Control subjects will receive an equivalent volume of normal saline intravenously.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of cases where successful randomization occurred
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases where Magnesium (Mg) or saline bolus was delivered with a goal of <2 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases with adherence to treatment protocol
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Assessment of adherence will involve reviewing chart data to evaluate the timing of medication order placement and timing of administration by the nurse.
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases for which serum is successfully drawn and analyzed
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases where patient's Cerebral Performance Category Score (CPC) status is assessed
Time Frame: At hospital discharge, on average 3 weeks
The CPC assessment score will be derived from the patient's electronic medical record (EMR).
At hospital discharge, on average 3 weeks
Proportion of cases where patient's CPC status is assessed
Time Frame: Day 30
The CPC assessment score will be derived from the patient's EMR.
Day 30
Proportion of cases where patient's CPC status is assessed
Time Frame: Day 90
The CPC assessment score will be derived from the patient's EMR.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse reactions related to magnesium therapy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases for which magnesium levels are found to be >6 mg/dl
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases for which magnesium levels are found to be 8.1-10 mg/dl
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Proportion of cases for which magnesium levels are found to be >10 mg/dl
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 90 days
Through study completion, an average of 90 days
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Day 90
Mortality due to all causes
Day 90
Proportion of patients with unfavorable neurological outcomes
Time Frame: At hospital discharge, on average 3 weeks
The Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score is a five-point scale used to assess neurological outcome after cardiac arrest and other events. Scores range from 1 to 5, a score of 1 or 2 is considered a favorable outcome, and scores of 3, 4, or 5 are considered an unfavorable outcome (severe neurological disability, persistent vegetative state or death).
At hospital discharge, on average 3 weeks
Proportion of patients with unfavorable neurological outcomes
Time Frame: Day 30
The Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score is a five-point scale used to assess neurological outcome after cardiac arrest and other events. Scores range from 1 to 5, a score of 1 or 2 is considered a favorable outcome, and scores of 3, 4, or 5 are considered an unfavorable outcome (severe neurological disability, persistent vegetative state or death).
Day 30
Proportion of patients with unfavorable neurological outcomes
Time Frame: Day 90
The Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score is a five-point scale used to assess neurological outcome after cardiac arrest and other events. Scores range from 1 to 5, a score of 1 or 2 is considered a favorable outcome, and scores of 3, 4, or 5 are considered an unfavorable outcome (severe neurological disability, persistent vegetative state or death).
Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NYU Langone Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sam Parnia, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-00262
  • 1R34HL166859-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Requests may be directed to: Sam.Parnia@nyulangone.org. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Sam.Parnia@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings