High Altitude Residents With High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension (HAPH), 6MWT Assessed at High Altitude (3200m) vs Low Altitude (760m)

January 19, 2026 updated by: University of Zurich

Comparative Study of 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD) in Patients With High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension Permanently Residing Above 2500 Meters When Assessed Near Resident High Altitude (HA) at 3200m vs. at Low Altitude (LA) 760m

To study the effect of relocation from 3200m (Aksay) to 760m (Bishkek) in highlanders with High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension (HAPH) who permanently live >2500m on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This research in highlanders with HAPH diagnosed by echocardiography and defined by a RV/RA >30 mmHg who permanently live at HA >2500 m will perform a 6-minute walk distance test near their living altitude in Aksay at 3200 m and on day 2 and 7 at 760 m after relocation

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Kyrgyzstan
      • Aksay Plateau, Naryn, Kyrgyzstan, Kyrgyzstan
        • Aksay Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Permanently living >2500 m
  • HAPH diagnosed with a minimum RV/RA of 30 mmHg assessed by echocardiography at an altitude of 3200 m
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Highlanders who cannot follow the study investigations,
  • Patients with moderate to severe concomitant lung disease (FEV1<70% or forced vital capacity <70%), severe parenchymal lung disease, heavy smoking >20 cigarettes/day or >20 pack-years.
  • Coexistent unstable systemic hypertension or coronary artery disease that required adjustment of medication within the last 2 months
  • Regular use of medication that affects control of breathing (benzodiazepines, opioids, acetazolamide)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Assessments at 3200 m and 760 m, respectively
Participants will have a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) assessment near their resident altitude at 3200 m and after relocation to 760 m after 1 and 7 days.
Other: 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
6-minute walk test (6MWT) will be performed according to clinical standards

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-minute walk distance (6MWD) on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in 6MWD in meter between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-minute walk distance (6MWD) on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in meter between LA (760 m) and HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Arterial oxygen saturation by pulseoximetry (SpO2) at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in SpO2 in % between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Arterial oxygen saturation by pulseoximetry (SpO2) at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in SpO2 in % between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Heart rate at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: after the first night at LA (760 m)
Change in hear rate in bpm between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
after the first night at LA (760 m)
Heart rate at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in hear rate in bpm between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Blood pressure at rest and at 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in blood pressure in mmHg between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Blood pressure at rest and at 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change in blood pressure in mmHg between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Borg Dyspnea scale at end 6MWT on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change of the Borg CR10 dyspnea scale at end of the 6MWT after the first night at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Borg Dyspnea scale at end 6MWT on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change of the Borg CR10 dyspnea scale at end of the 6MWT after seven nights at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Borg leg fatigue scale at end 6MWT on day 2 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change of the Borg CR10 leg fatigue scale at end of the 6MWT after the first night at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Borg leg fatigue scale at end 6MWT on day 7 of relocation to 760 m
Time Frame: day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m
Change of the Borg CR10 leg fatigue scale at end of the 6MWT after seven nights at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
day 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Zurich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Ulrich, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Zurich, Department of Pulmonology
  • Principal Investigator: Talant M Sooronbaev, Prof. Dr., National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine named after academician M.Mirrakhimov

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HAPH_HAvsLA_6MWT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on 6-minute walk test (6MWT)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings