Comparison of CPAP and Gamow Bag Ventilation to Treat HAPE (CPAP)

January 12, 2021 updated by: sultan mehmood kamran

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Hyperbaric Chamber Ventilation for the Patients of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) When Given in Addition to Standard of care-a Randomized Control Trial

High altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is mostly treated with supplemental oxygen, nifedipine 30mg twice a day, rest, limiting cold exposure and descent (simulated or actual) Gamow Bag provides simulated descent and buy time for actual descent. CPAP is claimed to be effective in many case reports to treat HAPE temporarily until actual descent is taken place. This study aims to evaluate the role of CPAP in treating HAPE at those high altitude stations where Gamow bag is not available and immediate descent is not possible.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Swenson described HAPE in 2002, as a form of hydrostatic acute pulmonary edema with an alteration of alveolar-capillary permeability. Overall prevalence of AMS is 10-20% while incidence of HAPE, HACE or mixed incidence is 2-3%. Highest reported incidence of HAPE among Indian soldiers climbing to Siachen glacier is 15.5%. At 1500-2400m, A series of 52 patients admitted for HAPE over a period of 9 years was reported in literature..

Scientific rationale:

Positive pressure has been used to increase altitude tolerance since the 1940s under simulated altitudes. PEEP applied via face mask increased SpO2 and decreased AMS symptoms. CPAP was used after ascent to 3205 m on Mount Cook in New Zealand where it improved SpO2 and reduced symptoms of HAPE. A CPAP helmet providing 15 cmH20 CPAP improved SpO2 in a single HAPE patient (at 5300 m) from 56% to 74%.-1st case report. A study at Thorang La pass (5416 m) in October 2010 in the Nepal Himalaya found that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is useful as an additional modality to treat presumed high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE)- 2nd case report.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male gender
  • Age 18-45 years
  • Previously fit and no comorbids
  • Suspected HAPE

    --arrived in the past 01 week on the post

  • Expected evacuation from post more than 8 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms suggest acute infective etiology.
  • Symptoms after one week of stay at HA
  • Altered mental status.
  • Disturbed balance
  • Visual impairment
  • Severe headache
  • A speedy evacuation to a lower height is available

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CPAP arm
In addition to standard of care, CPAP will be provided at high altitude posts where Gamow bag is not available and all patients of HAPE will be given CPAP when evacuation/descent is either not possible or delayed due to weather conditions.
CPAP device set at 6-8cmH2O for several hours
Other Names:
  • CPAP-REMstar pro (system one 60 series)
NO_INTERVENTION: Gamow bag arm/hyperbaric chamber
Posts where Gamow bag would be available, the patients of HAPE will be given standard of care and will be asked to lie inside Gamow bag inflated at 2 Psi for several hours to simulate a descent of 1500 meters when evacuation/descent is either not possible or delayed due to weather conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of HAPE
Time Frame: 8 hours

No dyspnea at rest, 2. RR < 20 3. Pulse < 100 4. O2 sat > 90% 5. Chest clears to auscultation

Pulse < 100 O2 sat > 90% CheComplete resolution of HAPE symptoms RR < 20 Pulse < 100 O2 sat > 90% Chest clear to auscultation complete resolution of HAPE symptoms with RR < 20, Pulse < 100, O2 saturation > 92% and chest clear to auscultation

8 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Partial improvement in HAPE features
Time Frame: 8 hours
Partial improvement in symptoms and signs as measured by at least one grade improvement in MMRC score, at least 25 percent improvement in all or some of the vital signs or oxygen saturations
8 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Imran Fazal, FCPS, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High Altitude Pulmonary Edema

Clinical Trials on Continuous positive airway pressure machine

Subscribe