Does Occlusive Hydrocolloid Silver-containing Wound Dressing After Sternotomy Reduce Surgical Side Infection After Cardiac Surgery? (OHSCWD)

July 12, 2024 updated by: Dr. med. Kathrin Dohle, University Medical Center Mainz

Randomized Controlled Trial: Does the Use of Occlusive Hydrocolloid Silver-containing Wound Dressing After Sternotomy Reduce Surgical Side Infection After Cardiac Surgery?

Wound healing disorders are a major problem in cardiac surgery. They prolong the inpatient stay and are associated with a high health and, above all, psychological burden for patients. They also represent a major organizational, medical and financial challenge for the treatment team. There is therefore still a great need for effective prevention of wound healing disorders. It goes without saying that wound management plays a major role in the development of wound healing disorders. Nowadays, there are a large number of products from various manufacturers and studies for efficient wound healing disorder prophylaxis. One point of criticism is that most of the existing studies are financed by the manufacturer. Due to the otherwise broad range of applications for all wounds in various specialist areas, it remains to be clarified whether such products can achieve a reduction in the rate of wound healing disorders, especially in cardiac surgery. After extensive literature research, we are of the opinion that the Aquacel Surgical Ag dressing, a new silver-coated hydrocolloid dressing, can be offered to cardiac surgery patients at our clinic as an effective prophylaxis against wound healing disorders.The study is a randomized prospective clinical trial. It is being conducted at the Clinic for Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and has already been approved by the Rhineland-Palatinate Ethics Committee. The study should include 440 heart patients and last for 12 months. It will compare the Aquacel Surgical Ag bandage against our conventional methods. This study is being conducted independently of the industry. We want to prove that an intelligent investment in the prophylaxis of wound healing disorders is worthwhile for both patients and the clinic. If the outcome of the study is positive, this dressing will be be used regularly in our cardiac surgery clinic.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
352

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Rheinland-Pfalz
      • Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, 55131
        • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Coronary artery bypass surgery
  2. Elective and primary surgery (no reoperations)
  3. Complete median sternotomy
  4. Age under 90 years
  5. Weight in the range of 50-140kg
  6. No known allergy to silver or other wound dressings
  7. No immunosuppressive therapy or hormonal substitution therapy, except for thyroid hormone
  8. Capacity to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Failure of medical personnel to adhere to study protocol, e.g., not applying the right wound dressing according to study protocol
  2. Patients own decision
  3. Lack of harvesting of at least one internal thoracic artery
  4. Peri- and post-operative ventilation for >48h
  5. Re-thoracotomy for reasons other than SSI, e.g., bleeding
  6. Mortality within the first 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control Group
a standard wound dressing composed of sterile gauze and adhesive tape was applied under sterile conditions. In the absence of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the dressing was left on the wound until the second postoperative day (POD 2), otherwise, it was changed immediately. Starting at POD 2, the dressing was changed daily under aseptic conditions until the wound remained dry (between POD 3-5). In the absence of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the wound was then left uncovered. This practice corresponded to the standard treatment of cardiothoracic patients in our department at the time of initiating this study.
Other: Standard Care (sterile gauze and adhesive tape)
Presurgical preparation was identical in both groups and no further intervention in patient treatment was made. See descpription of arms.
Experimental: Test Group
directly after closing the wound, an occlusive hydrocolloid silver-containing wound dressing (Aquacel Ag Surgical®, ConvaTec, Oklahoma City, OK, USA) was applied under sterile conditions and, in the absence of bleeding; excessive wound secretion, or detachment, was maintained on the wound until POD 5, at which time the dressing was removed. In case of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the dressing was removed, the wound was cleaned, and a new sterile hydrocolloid wound dressing applied under aseptic conditions.
Combination product: Aquacel Ag Surgical®
Presurgical preparation was identical in both groups and no further intervention in patient treatment was made. See descpription of arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SSI rate
Time Frame: 30 days
overall rate of incidence of any kind of SSI
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
dressing changes
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
severity of SSI
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
need for treatment
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Medical Center Mainz

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
German Research Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OHSCWD for sternotomy

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings