Talocrural Joint Manipulation in Stroke
The Effect of Talocrural Joint Manipulation on Static Balance in Patients With Stroke
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: ömer dursun, Asst. Prof.
- Phone Number: +90 5426088687
- Email: fztomrdrsn@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Birkan Özkardaş, Mr.
- Phone Number: +90 5550639585
- Email: brknzkrds31@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Merkez
-
Bolu, Merkez, Turkey, 14020
- Bolu İzzet Baysal Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Two months or longer elapsed since the stroke,
- 2. A Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or higher,
- 3. The ability to stand independently for 20 seconds or more,
- 4. The ability to walk independently for 10 meters with the use of walking aids or orthoses if necessary,
- 5. Being between 45 and 75 years of age,
- 6. Having a Brunnstrom stage of 4 or above
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. The presence of severe osteoarthritis in the lower extremity,
- 2. The presence of cancer or diabetic neuropathy,
- 3. The presence of vestibular disorder,
- 4. The presence of lower extremity ulceration or amputation,
- 5. History of vertigo,
- 6. Alcohol consumption within the last 24 hours,
- 7. Hemodynamic instability,
- 8. Diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke involving the basilar artery and cerebellum,
- 9. The presence of other neurological disorders (such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease),
- 10. Having experienced an acute lower extremity injury in the last six weeks,
- 11. History of lower extremity surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Talocrural Joint Manipulation Group
Each group will receive both placebo and real talocrural joint manipulations in a randomized cross-over design.
There will be a minimum interval of 48 hours between the interventions.
Data obtained after the real manipulation will be recorded as the placebo comparator group data.
|
This technique, aiming to increase ankle dorsiflexion and mechanoreceptor activation, is based on the application of high velocity low amplitude traction to the joint.
This intervention is a classic method used to evaluate the effect of talocrural joint manipulation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Talocrural Joint Manipulation Group
Each group will receive both placebo and real talocrural joint manipulations in a randomized cross-over design.
There will be a minimum interval of 48 hours between the interventions.
Data obtained after the real manipulation will be recorded as the active comparison group data.
|
This technique, aiming to increase ankle dorsiflexion and mechanoreceptor activation, is based on the application of high velocity low amplitude traction to the joint.
This intervention is a classic method used to evaluate the effect of talocrural joint manipulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline overall stability immediately after intervention
|
Overall stability index, evaluated using the Biodex Balance System.
Overall stability index scores were derived from calculations of deviations from the center of gravity in the anteroposterior and mediolateral axes by the device.
A lower score indicates smaller deviation and better postural stability.
The assessment was conducted on a stable platform with three 20-second repetitions interspersed with 10-second rest periods.
Participants remained standing during the rest periods, and the device automatically computed the average of the three repetitions.
As the general stability index value increases, overall stability decreases.
No definable minimum or maximum theoretical value.
|
Change from baseline overall stability immediately after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mediolateral Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline mediolateral stability immediately after intervention
|
Mediolateral stability index, evaluated using the Biodex Balance System.
Mediolateral stability index scores were derived from calculations of deviations from the center of gravity in the mediolateral axis by the device.
As the mediolateral index value increases, mediolateral stability decreases.
No definable minimum or maximum theoretical value.
|
Change from baseline mediolateral stability immediately after intervention
|
|
Anteroposterior Stability Index Measurement
Time Frame: Change from baseline anteroposterior stability immediately after intervention
|
Anteroposterior stability index, evaluated using the Biodex Balance System.
Anteroposterior stability index scores were derived from calculations of deviations from the center of gravity in the anteroposterior axis by the device.
As the overall anteroposterior stability value increases, anteroposterior stability decreases.
No definable minimum or maximum theoretical value.
|
Change from baseline anteroposterior stability immediately after intervention
|
|
Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Measurement With Knee in Extended and Flexed Positions
Time Frame: Change from baseline ankle dorsiflexion range of motion immediately after intervention
|
The patient was asked to stand facing the wall and place their hands on the wall at shoulder width apart, with the affected foot positioned behind and the knee in full extension.
Then, without lifting the back foot or compromising knee extension, the patient was instructed to reach forward as far as possible.
Subsequently, the calcaneal tubercle was placed one centimeter above the floor, and the measurement was taken with a water level gauge attached to the phone.
The same measurement was repeated with the knee in flexion (20 degrees or more).
|
Change from baseline ankle dorsiflexion range of motion immediately after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ömer dursun, Asst. Prof., Bitlis Eren University
- Principal Investigator: burak mavuş, Mr., Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Alamer A, Melese H, Getie K, Deme S, Tsega M, Ayhualem S, Birhanie G, Abich Y, Yitayeh Gelaw A. Effect of Ankle Joint Mobilization with Movement on Range of Motion, Balance and Gait Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2021 Sep 1;11:51-60. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S317865. eCollection 2021.
- Yates JS, Lai SM, Duncan PW, Studenski S. Falls in community-dwelling stroke survivors: an accumulated impairments model. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 May-Jun;39(3):385-94.
- Divani AA, Vazquez G, Barrett AM, Asadollahi M, Luft AR. Risk factors associated with injury attributable to falling among elderly population with history of stroke. Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):3286-92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559195. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
- Lamb SE, Ferrucci L, Volapto S, Fried LP, Guralnik JM; Women's Health and Aging Study. Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: the Women's Health and Aging Study. Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):494-501.
- Powden CJ, Hogan KK, Wikstrom EA, Hoch MC. The Effect of 2 Forms of Talocrural Joint Traction on Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Postural Control in Those With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 May;26(3):239-244. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0152. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
- Hoch MC, Andreatta RD, Mullineaux DR, English RA, Medina McKeon JM, Mattacola CG, McKeon PO. Two-week joint mobilization intervention improves self-reported function, range of motion, and dynamic balance in those with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Res. 2012 Nov;30(11):1798-804. doi: 10.1002/jor.22150. Epub 2012 May 18.
- Hoch MC, McKeon PO. Joint mobilization improves spatiotemporal postural control and range of motion in those with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Res. 2011 Mar;29(3):326-32. doi: 10.1002/jor.21256. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
- Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley A, Tallis RC. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006 Jan;86(1):30-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/86.1.30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BEUFTR-5
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.