Cannabis, Linked Emotions, and Adolescent Risk Study (CLEAR)
Characterizing Proximal Risk for Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation With Acute Cannabis Use and Withdrawal Among Adolescents Using Ecological Momentary Assessment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Randi M Schuster, PhD
- Phone Number: 617-643-6673
- Email: rschuster@mgh.harvard.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Julia Jashinski, MSW
- Phone Number: 617-643-1984
- Email: jjashinski@mgh.harvard.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Recruiting
- Massachusetts General Hopsital
-
Contact:
- Randi M Schuster, PhD
- Phone Number: 617-643-6673
- Email: rschuster@mgh.harvard.edu
-
Contact:
- Julia Jashinski, MSW
- Phone Number: 617-643-1984
- Email: jjashinski@mgh.harvard.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 12-18;
- Current daily or near daily cannabis use (i.e., use ≥ 4 days per week on average; Timeline Followback);
- Score ≥ 5 on PHQ-9;
- Access to an internet-capable smartphone (iOS or Android);
- Provision of at least 1 collateral contact for risk monitoring;
- Provision of informed assent (or consent if 18 years or older) and parent/guardian consent if <age 18;
- Greater than 50% response rate to EMA prompts during the first EMA phase;
- No immediate plan to discontinue cannabis use in the next 3 months;
- Positive toxicology result for cannabis on baseline urinalysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any factor that impairs ability to comprehend and effectively participate, including acute intoxication at time of consent;
- Cannabis use >4 times/day on average (to maximize likelihood of capturing mood and SI during non-use times);
- Inability to speak/write English fluently;
- Gross cognitive impairment, for example due to florid psychosis, intellectual disability, developmental delay, or neurodegenerative disease;
- Current epilepsy diagnosis;
- Individuals who are under the legal protection of the government or state (wards of the state);
- Response of "No" to the knowledge check question regarding EMA suicidality response time;
- Inability to wear Fitbit device.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cannabis Abstinence (CB-Abst)
Those randomized to the abstinence condition will be asked to stop using cannabis for eight weeks.
They will participate in a contingency management protocol, which uses an escalating remuneration schedule to incentivize abstinence.
Abstinence is confirmed biochemically via progressively decreasing values of creatinine-adjusted THCCOOH.
|
Those randomized to the abstinence condition (CB-Abst) will be incentivized using an escalating reinforcement schedule for eight weeks of cannabis abstinence.
|
|
No Intervention: Cannabis Monitoring (CB-Mon)
Those randomized to the monitoring condition will be asked to make no changes to their cannabis use frequency or dose for the duration of the eight week study.
|
|
|
No Intervention: Pre-intervention Pooled Groups (EMA Phase 1 Only)
All enrolled participants will participate in approximately two weeks of EMA data collection prior to being randomized and starting intervention procedures to characterize mood during baseline use as usual (CB-Abst or CB-Mon).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Aim 1: Cannabis use in the last hour
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a binary rating as to whether cannabis was used in the last hour, either 0 (No use) or 1 (Use in the last hour).
We will examine data from all participants prior to randomization to experimental arms (Pre-intervention Pooled Groups arm).
|
Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual)
|
|
Aim 1: Motivation to use cannabis to improve mood collected
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
We will use the subset of responses following cannabis use in the last hour.
The outcome is a rating for whether cannabis was used to improve negative mood, from 1 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much).
Higher ratings indicate greater motivation to use cannabis to improve negative mood.
We will examine data from all participants prior to randomization to experimental arms (Pre-intervention Pooled Groups arm).
|
Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual)
|
|
Aim 2: Depleted mood
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a composite score of depleted mood computed as the average over 5 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Sad/Self-hatred/Numb/Hopeless/Fatigued).
Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of depleted mood.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
|
Aim 2: Negative cognitive impact
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a composite score of negative cognitive impact computed as the average over 2 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Disinterested/Inattentive).
Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of negative cognitive impact.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
|
Aim 2: Negative activation
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a composite score of negative activation computed as the average over 3 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Agitated/Irritated/Anxious).
Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of negative activation.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
|
Aim 2: Passive suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a composite score of passive suicidal ideation computed as the average over 3 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how strong is your [IDEATION] (sub in Thoughts about death/Wishing suffering could be over/Better off as dead).
Higher ratings indicate worse passive suicidal ideation.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
|
Aim 2: Suicidal urges
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a rating to the following prompt: right now how strong is your intention to kill yourself, from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much).
Higher ratings indicate worse suicidal urges.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
|
Aim 2: Non-suicidal self-injury urges
Time Frame: Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day.
The outcome is a rating to the following prompt: right now how strong is your desire to hurt your body, from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much).
Higher ratings indicate worse self-injury urges.
We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon).
|
Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Randi M Schuster, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024P002417
- 1R01DA054145-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.