Laser Acupuncture on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Impact of Laser Acupuncture on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Nesma M Allam, PhD
- Phone Number: 0580506239
- Email: dr.nesma2011@yahoo.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 12111
- Faculty of Physical Therapy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (positive Clarkes sign and Waldron test)
- Age from 18 to 25 years
- Patients suffering from pain which aggravated by prolonged sitting, stair climbing, running, squatting, kneeling, hopping\jumping, overuse activities and relieved by rest for at least 3 months
- Visual analog scale (VAS) greater than 3 points in daily activity
- The ability to participate in the study and follow the treatment schedule.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Physiotherapy in the last 12 months
- Intra-articular injection in the last 3 months
- Other knee disorders such as: (osteoarthritis, previous knee surgery, history of knee arthroplasty, or traumatic injury related joint deformity)
- BMI greater than or equal 30
- Pregnancy
- Pacemaker insertion
- Photosensitivity
- History of using oral analgesic or NSAIDs in the previous 4 weeks,
- History of malignancy, psychiatric disorder, mental retardation, neurologic dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, or uncontrolled hypertension.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A (Laser acupuncture group)
Participants will receive Laser acupuncture with energy of 4 J per point for 80 s, with a total dosage of 24 J in each session, 2 times /week for 4 weeks.
Additionally, traditional physical therapy program will be conducted to participants in the study group.
|
Laser acupuncture will be used in this study with energy of 4 J per point for 80 s, with a total dosage of 24 J in each session, 2 times /week for 4 weeks
exercise program consisted of stretching for hamstring, gastrocnemius and iliotibial band, and strengthening exercises, which include isometric quadriceps exercises, straight leg raising, lateral straight leg raise, isometric hip adduction and squat to 30° knee flexion, 2 times /week for 4 weeks
|
|
Sham Comparator: Group B (Sham-laser acupuncture group)
Participants will receive the same intervention while the device turned off, in addition to the exercise program consisted of stretching for hamstring, gastrocnemius and iliotibial band, and strengthening exercises, which include isometric quadriceps exercises, straight leg raising, lateral straight leg raise, isometric hip adduction and squat to 30° knee flexion, 2 times /week for 4 weeks.
|
exercise program consisted of stretching for hamstring, gastrocnemius and iliotibial band, and strengthening exercises, which include isometric quadriceps exercises, straight leg raising, lateral straight leg raise, isometric hip adduction and squat to 30° knee flexion, 2 times /week for 4 weeks
Participants will receive laser acupuncture while the device is turned off.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The visual analogue scale represents the pain range that a patient thinks they might experience.
The line is typically 10 centimetres long, with or without markings at each centimetre serves as a representation of the range.
The worst pain the patient could possibly envision is represented by one end, while; no pain; is represented by the other.
The patient marks the scale by drawing a line on it to indicate the amount of discomfort they are experiencing from 0-10.
Higher scores represent worse pain.
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of motion for knee flexion
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
A universal goniometer was used to assess knee flexion while the subject was lying prone.
It is an accurate and trustworthy measuring device.
It was assessed while resting prone and with the knee extended.
While keeping the other foot in touch with the plinth, the patient was instructed to bring the heel of the leg being tested as near to the buttock as feasible.
With one arm aligned with the lateral malleolus and the other with the greater trochanter, the fulcrum of the goniometry is situated on the lateral epicondyle of the examined knee.
A range of motion of knee flexion ranged from 0-135°.
The higher the range, the better the results.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Function of knee joint
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
A scale known as Kujala patellofemoral score will be used for assessment of the function of the patellofemoral pain syndrome.
The scores of this rating system vary from 100 (a normal, painless, totally functional knee) to 0 (severe pain and dysfunction in the knee).
Haddad et al. conducted research on the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the scale.
The greater the scores, the better the results.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Range of motion for knee extension
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The dominant limbs hip and knee were bent to a 90-degree angle for the first assessment, while the foot was kept in a relaxed position.
Knee extension, as demonstrated by Norkin &White with the universal goniometer.
The normal ROM for knee extension is 135- 0º.
Each person's knee extension range of motion was assessed three times, and the computations employed the arithmetic mean of the three measures.
The lower the range, the better the results.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Zeinab Ali Hamada, PhD, Assisstant professor of physical therapy for surgery, Faculty of physical therapy
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB Approval No. 2024-82
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.