Incremental Diagnostic Value of Tau-PET With [18F]RO948 vs Amyloid-PET in Patients With Cognitive Impairment (IDV of tau-PET)

December 16, 2025 updated by: Valentina Garibotto, University Hospital, Geneva

Incremental Diagnostic Value of Tau-PET With [18F]RO948 vs Amyloid-PET in Patients With

The objective of the study is to investigate the clinical validity of tau-PET with [18F]RO948 vs. amyloid-PET in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or mild dementia

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dementia is defined as cognitive impairment associated with loss of autonomy and is usually preceded by a prodromal phase - Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) - which represents a highly heterogeneous entity comprising different underlying etiologies, of which Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent. Several AD biomarkers - including MRI, FDG-PET and CSF measures of amyloid and tau pathology - have been validated as diagnostic (allowing an early and differential diagnosis of AD) and prognostic (predicting progression from MCI to dementia due to AD) tools. In contrast and despite the increasing consensus on their clinical utility, usage of PET markers of amyloid and tau pathology is not yet standard clinical practice. Moreover, while the clinical utility of amyloid-PET has been exhaustively investigated, to date no study has prospectively assessed the clinical utility of tau-PET. Assessing the clinical utility of diagnostic tools is fundamental for clinical practice. This will be the first study assessing the clinical utility of [18F]RO948 tau-PET vs. standard of care amyloid-PET, providing unique information to define appropriate diagnostic algorithms

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • Recruiting
        • Geneva University Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giovanni Frisoni, Pr
        • Contact:
    • Canton of Vaud
      • Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, 1211
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Medical Universitaire Vaudois
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written Inform Consent to participating.
  • 50 to 85 years of age
  • a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI=at least one pathological neuropsychological test but no functional impairment based on the Amsterdam IADL score) or mild dementia (both cognitive and functional impairments)
  • availability of MRI within 6 months before screening
  • prescription of a diagnostic amyloid PET
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study, as judged by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of psychiatric disorders, extensive white matter lesions or other stigmata of vascular dementia.
  • Visual and auditory acuity inadequate for neuropsychological testing.
  • Enrolment in previous clinical trials for AD potentially affecting amyloid and/or tau brain load
  • Enrolment in other trials or studies not compatible with [18F]RO948 Imaging study.
  • Ferromagnetic implants and devices (including implants or devices held in place by sutures, granulation or ingrowth of tissue, fixation devices, or by other means) not eligible for MRI scanning.
  • Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant (negative urine β-hCG on the day of imaging) or breast feeding at screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Amyloid-PET and then Tau-PET
The participant will have the Amyloid-PET (standard of care) and then Tau-PET (experimental)
Diagnostic test: PET/CT with RO958 (experimental)
the participant will have 2 PET (one with an experimental radiotracer- Tau PET), one with a standard radiotracer (amyloid-PET)
Experimental: Tau-PET and then Amyloid-PET
The participant will have the Tau-PET (experimental) and then the Amyloid-PET (standard of care)
Diagnostic test: PET/CT with RO958 (experimental)
the participant will have 2 PET (one with an experimental radiotracer- Tau PET), one with a standard radiotracer (amyloid-PET)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between tau-PET with [18F]RO948 and amyloid PET in the change of physician's diagnostic confidence (50-100% visual analogue scale) across time
Time Frame: through study completion , an average of 2 years
Amyloid and tau PET scans will be classified as positive or negative for the presence of pathology using visual reading by an expert reader (amyloid-PET), as clinically established, and SUVR cut offs previously published for [18F]RO948 tau-PET (Leuzy, Smith et al. 2020) as well as a visual check
through study completion , an average of 2 years
Difference between tau-PET with [18F]RO948 and amyloid PET in the changes in etiological diagnoses across time (i.e., from Alzheimer disease (AD) to non-AD, or from non-AD to AD).
Time Frame: through study completion , an average of 2 years
The changes in etiological diagnosis across rounds will be assessed using the McNemar's test
through study completion , an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of clinical and biomarker-based diagnoses
Time Frame: through study completion , an average of 2 years
the accuracy of clinical (routine workup only) and biomarker-based diagnoses (based on tau-PET with [18F]RO948 or amyloid-PET or both) using the 2-year follow-up biomarker based diagnosis as gold standard
through study completion , an average of 2 years
Amyloid-PET and tau-PET predictivity of cognitive decline and dementia onset
Time Frame: through study completion , an average of 2 years
The amyloid-PET and tau-PET predictivity of cognitive decline and dementia onset will be assessed using linear mixed models with cognition as dependent variable; results of amyloid-PET or tau-PET, time and their interaction as independent variables; and age, gender and education as covariates
through study completion , an average of 2 years
Absence of adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion , an average of 2 years
Absence of adverse events
through study completion , an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Geneva

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023-02263

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings