Ameliorating Effects and Mechanisms of TaVNS on Constipation in PD Patients.
Ameliorating Effects and Mechanisms of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Constipation in Parkinson's Disease Patients: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Kezhong Zhang, Professor
- Phone Number: 13770840575
- Email: kezhong_zhang1969@126.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 40-70 years;
- had a PD diagnosis designated by movement disorder neurologists (Ke-zhong Zhang and Yong-sheng Yuan) according to Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria;
- fulfilled Rome IV criteria for functional constipation, including having < 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBM; i.e., not induced by rescue medication) per week for the past 3 months with symptom duration of at least 6 months;
- stable initiation of PD medications, leastways 3 month before this investigation; (5) provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a history of previous abdominal surgery (other than appendectomy);
- the presence of carcinoma;
- any organic diseases causing constipation or neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, rachischisis, or spinal cord injury;
- taking antidepressant agents including tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors;
- a serious concomitant disease of the heart, liver, kidney, or diabetes;
- pregnancy or lactation;
- participating in another trial or enrolled in a trial during the past month;
- an allergic reaction to surface electrodes.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
For Experimental Arm, active transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Patients underwent 28 consecutive daily sessions of taVNS.
|
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation was conducted by transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy instrument to the cymba conchae of left ear in the vicinity of the auricular branch vagus nerve.
Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20 Hz; pulse width = 500 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
For sham transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation arm, Sham Comparator, patients underwent 28 consecutive daily sessions of sham-taVNS (the electrodes were fixed at the the left earlobe).
|
In the sham stimulation group, the electrodes were fixed at the left earlobe with the same stimulus parameters.
Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20 Hz; pulse width = 500 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
alterations in complete spontaneous bowel movements per week (CSBMs/week)
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 weeks before baseline, 2 weeks before the last day of intervention
|
By having patients record their bowel movements two weeks before the start of the experiment and two weeks before the end of the experiment, calculate the CSBMs/week.
|
Assessed at 2 weeks before baseline, 2 weeks before the last day of intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Scale for Parkinson's Disease (GIDS-PD) at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
The Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Scale for Parkinson's Disease is a novel disease-specific self-report tool to quantitatively assess the presence and severity of gastrointestinal dysfunction features in patients with PD, with strong reliability and validity.
The GIDS-PD (Appendix S1) is a Likert self-report scale composed of 12 items.
The total score of the GIDS-PD is computed by adding the total score of items 1 through 12, resulting in a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 108.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scales at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Used to evaluate the gastrointestinal symptoms and discomfort level of patients, from 0 to 105.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline constipation symptoms scores at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Used to evaluate the constipation symptoms , from 0 to 30.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life scale,PAC-QOL at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Used to evaluate quality of life, a total of 28 items are divided into 4 aspects: physiological discomfort, psychological discomfort, palpitations, and satisfaction.
The PAC-QOL score range is 0-4, with lower scores indicating better results.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Used to evaluate the constipation symptoms , from 0 to 48.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline HRAM at one day post intervention--Resting pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Following HRV test, HRAM was undertaken using a solid-state manometric instrument with 12 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals and an outer diameter of 4.2 mm to evaluate anorectal sensorimotor function.
Patients were asked to be in the left lateral position with the hips and knees flexed, and then the solid-state catheter was inserted into the rectum through the anal orifice.
After a 3-minute period of stabilization, the sequential maneuver procedures are as follows: Resting pressure (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg).
First-sensation volume, desire to defecate threshold, and maximum tolerance were tested by constant dilation of balloon
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline HRAM at one day post intervention--maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Following HRV test, HRAM was undertaken using a solid-state manometric instrument with 12 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals and an outer diameter of 4.2 mm to evaluate anorectal sensorimotor function.
Patients were asked to be in the left lateral position with the hips and knees flexed, and then the solid-state catheter was inserted into the rectum through the anal orifice.
After a 3-minute period of stabilization, the sequential maneuver procedures are as follows: Resting pressure (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg).
First-sensation volume, desire to defecate threshold, and maximum tolerance were tested by constant dilation of balloon
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline HRAM at one day post intervention--First sensation (mL)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Following HRV test, HRAM was undertaken using a solid-state manometric instrument with 12 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals and an outer diameter of 4.2 mm to evaluate anorectal sensorimotor function.
Patients were asked to be in the left lateral position with the hips and knees flexed, and then the solid-state catheter was inserted into the rectum through the anal orifice.
After a 3-minute period of stabilization, the sequential maneuver procedures are as follows: Resting pressure (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg).
First-sensation volume, desire to defecate threshold, and maximum tolerance were tested by constant dilation of balloon
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline HRAM at one day post intervention--desire to defecate threshold
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Following HRV test, HRAM was undertaken using a solid-state manometric instrument with 12 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals and an outer diameter of 4.2 mm to evaluate anorectal sensorimotor function.
Patients were asked to be in the left lateral position with the hips and knees flexed, and then the solid-state catheter was inserted into the rectum through the anal orifice.
After a 3-minute period of stabilization, the sequential maneuver procedures are as follows: Resting pressure (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg).
First-sensation volume, desire to defecate threshold, and maximum tolerance were tested by constant dilation of balloon
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline HRAM at one day post intervention--maximum tolerance
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Following HRV test, HRAM was undertaken using a solid-state manometric instrument with 12 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals and an outer diameter of 4.2 mm to evaluate anorectal sensorimotor function.
Patients were asked to be in the left lateral position with the hips and knees flexed, and then the solid-state catheter was inserted into the rectum through the anal orifice.
After a 3-minute period of stabilization, the sequential maneuver procedures are as follows: Resting pressure (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg).
First-sensation volume, desire to defecate threshold, and maximum tolerance were tested by constant dilation of balloon
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline serum indicators at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
A blood sample was taken at 8 a.m. at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.
For each patient, about 5 mL of blood was drawn into a procoagulant tube and 4 mL into 2 anticoagulant tubes with EDTA; it was centrifuged at 4°C and 1139g for 10 minutes and 5 minutes respectively.
The serum in the procoagulant tube was divided into 3 portions, and the plasma in the anticoagulant tubes was divided into 2 portions - each about 0.5 mL - and placed at -80°C for assay within 6 months.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline feces indicators at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
placed at -80°C for assay within 6 months.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline The motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale at one day post intervention
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
The measure mainly reflects the overall severity of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms.
The minimum and maximum values of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale are 0 and 108.
A higher score means a worse outcome.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline gastrointestinal electrogram at one day post intervention--amplitude
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
A total of 8 leads cover the body surface projection of the stomach and intestines, which can reflect the gastrointestinal motility
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
|
Change from Baseline gastrointestinal electrogram at one day post intervention--frequency
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
A total of 8 leads cover the body surface projection of the stomach and intestines, which can reflect the gastrointestinal motility.
|
Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kezhong Zhang, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-taVNS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.