Effects of Agility Training With and Without Foot Mobilization In Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Effects of Agility Training With and Without Foot Mobilization On Pain, Balance and Functional Performance In Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Imran Amjad, PhD
- Phone Number: 03324390125
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Recruiting
- Al- Rehman Hospital
-
Contact:
- Agha Salman Khan, MS-OMPT
- Phone Number: 03204646644
- Email: aghask5@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Hira Nawaz, MS-OMPT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical signs of patellofemoral pain syndrome such as retro patellar pain, crepitation, and pain with patellar grinding more than 6 months.
- Both genders of 20-40 years of age.
- Presence of pain on step down from a 25 step or double leg squat and sitting with knee bent greater than 15 min.
- Pain more than 4 on NPRS scale.
- Individual with anterior left/right asymmetries greater than 4 cm on Y balance test
- Excessive calcaneal eversion measured at 6° in the relaxed posture(6).
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of ligament and meniscal injury.
- History of lower limb fractures.
- History of post-surgical condition of lower limb
- History of systemic, connective tissue or neurologic condition
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Agility Training with Foot Mobilization
Agility Training with Foot Mobilization along with simple conventional treatment
|
Agility training with foot mobilization with the frequency of 3 sets of 10 repetitions thrice per week for a total six weeks.
Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after six weeks.
Agility training includes side stepping, braiding activities, and front and back crossover steps during forward ambulation, shuttle walking, multiple changes in direction during walking on therapist command.
TJM is a grade III Maitland technique and is applied with a high amplitude from the end range and 1s of vibration in the middle range of the joint through a linear motion to where tissue resistance is felt in the prone position, the patient is supported by a towel placed under the foot.
Two sets of 5 min total were performed for 6weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Agility Training without Foot Mobilization.
Agility training without foot mobilization along with simple conventional treatment.
|
Agility training includes side stepping, braiding activities, and front and back crossover steps during forward ambulation, shuttle walking, multiple changes in direction during walking on therapist command.
Comprising of Hot pack and TENS for 10 minutes and Ultrasound for 5 minutes .
Comprising of conventional exercises were given for 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
It includes semi squat, quadriceps isometric, terminal knee extension with elastic band, terminal knee extension in supine position, and adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS):
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The outcome was the 11-point NPRS to measure pain intensity.
The NPRS defines pain intensity from 0 to 10 points, with 0 and 10 points indicating no pain and the most severe pain respectively.
The reported test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) was 0.76, demonstrating it to be a good indicator of pain intensity.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Kujala Patellofemoral Pain Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Anterior knee pain scale is frequently referred as Kujala scale.
It's a 13 item questionnaire including different items on pain related to function and activities.
The items assessed in the questionnaire are patellar subluxation, claudication, pain, walking, climbing stairs and prolonged sitting with the knees flexed.
It has a score from 0 to 100 points, where 100 means without pain and functional limitations and 0 means constant pain and various functional limitations.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Y Balance Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The YBT assesses the balance by challenging his postural control system in 3 (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral) of the 8 SEBT (star excursion balance test) directions and has been advocated as a method for assessing dynamic balance (requires strength, flexibility and proprioception).
The Y balance score was calculated by dividing the sum of the maximum reach distance in the anterior (A), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions by 3 times the limb length (LL) of the individual, then multiplied by 100.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Navicular Droop Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Position the patient in standing so there is full weight-bearing through the lower extremity and ensure the foot is in the subtalar joint neutral position ("talar head congruent").
Mark the most prominent part of the navicular tuberosity and measure its distance from the supporting surface floor or step.
Ask the patient to relax and then measure the amount of sagittal plane excursion of the navicular with a ruler.
Alternatively, the test can also be performed in reverse, measuring from relaxed position up to talar neutral in standing postion.
Many clinicians also choose to perform this test by marking the start and end position of the navicular on an index card placed along the inside of the foot and then measure the change with a ruler.
The ICC2,1 values in the sitting and standing positions were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively, indicating significantly high inter-rater reliability.
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ali Raza, MS-OMPT, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Clifford AM, Dillon S, Hartigan K, O'Leary H, Constantinou M. The effects of McConnell patellofemoral joint and tibial internal rotation limitation taping techniques in people with Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Gait Posture. 2020 Oct;82:266-272. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
- da Silva Boitrago MV, de Mello NN, Barin FR, Junior PL, de Souza Borges JH, Oliveira M. Effects of proprioceptive exercises and strengthening on pain and functionality for patellofemoral pain syndrome in women: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Apr 19;18:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.017. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Luza LP, Luza M, Santos GM. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Modifies the Movement of the Rearfoot, but It Does Not Alter Plantar Pressure Distribution. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Aug;55(4):419-425. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698802. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
- Gomez Carrion A, de Los Angeles Atin Arratibel M, Morales Lozano MR, Martinez Sebastian C, de la Cruz Torres B, Sanchez-Gomez R. Kinematic Effect on the Navicular Bone with the Use of Rearfoot Varus Wedge. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;22(3):815. doi: 10.3390/s22030815.
- Rasti E, Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Ebrahimi N, Sobhan MR. Effects of whole body vibration with exercise therapy versus exercise therapy alone on flexibility, vertical jump height, agility and pain in athletes with patellofemoral pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 26;21(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03732-1.
- Adhama AI, Akindele MO, Ibrahim AA. Effects of variable frequencies of kinesthesia, balance and agility exercise program in adults with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jul 21;22(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05386-3.
- Shakouri A, Kamali F, Mohamadi M, Nouhi E. Lumbopelvic manipulation alone versus combined with dry needling in physically active patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jan;37:220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/RCR & AHS/24/0131
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.