Effects of Agility Training With and Without Foot Mobilization In Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

November 3, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Agility Training With and Without Foot Mobilization On Pain, Balance and Functional Performance In Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is referred to as peripatellar or retro-patellar pain, which is characterized by alterations in the physical and biomechanical features of the patellofemoral joint. Risk factors for PFPS include: anatomic anomalies, mal-alignment and altered biomechanics of the lower extremity, muscle dysfunction, patellar hypermobility, poor quadriceps, or iliotibial band flexibility, surgery, tight lateral structures, training errors or overuse and trauma. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of foot mobilization with and without agility training on pain, balance and functional performance in patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Riphah Clinic Lahore, Al Rehman Hospital, through convenient purposive sampling technique on 42 patients which will be allocated through using simple randomization into Group A and Group B. Group A will be treated with agility training and foot mobilization in patellofemoral pain syndrome and Group B will be treated with agility training without foot mobilization in patellofemoral pain syndrome thrice a week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will be conducted through pain (NPRS), Kujala patellofemoral pain scale, Y balance test and Navicular droop test before and after 6 weeks. Data will be analyzed using SPSS software version 25.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • Recruiting
        • Al- Rehman Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hira Nawaz, MS-OMPT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical signs of patellofemoral pain syndrome such as retro patellar pain, crepitation, and pain with patellar grinding more than 6 months.

  • Both genders of 20-40 years of age.
  • Presence of pain on step down from a 25 step or double leg squat and sitting with knee bent greater than 15 min.
  • Pain more than 4 on NPRS scale.
  • Individual with anterior left/right asymmetries greater than 4 cm on Y balance test
  • Excessive calcaneal eversion measured at 6° in the relaxed posture(6).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ligament and meniscal injury.
  • History of lower limb fractures.
  • History of post-surgical condition of lower limb
  • History of systemic, connective tissue or neurologic condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Agility Training with Foot Mobilization
Agility Training with Foot Mobilization along with simple conventional treatment
Agility training with foot mobilization with the frequency of 3 sets of 10 repetitions thrice per week for a total six weeks. Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after six weeks. Agility training includes side stepping, braiding activities, and front and back crossover steps during forward ambulation, shuttle walking, multiple changes in direction during walking on therapist command. TJM is a grade III Maitland technique and is applied with a high amplitude from the end range and 1s of vibration in the middle range of the joint through a linear motion to where tissue resistance is felt in the prone position, the patient is supported by a towel placed under the foot. Two sets of 5 min total were performed for 6weeks.
Other Names:
  • Simple conventional Treatment
Active Comparator: Agility Training without Foot Mobilization.
Agility training without foot mobilization along with simple conventional treatment.
Agility training includes side stepping, braiding activities, and front and back crossover steps during forward ambulation, shuttle walking, multiple changes in direction during walking on therapist command. Comprising of Hot pack and TENS for 10 minutes and Ultrasound for 5 minutes . Comprising of conventional exercises were given for 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks. It includes semi squat, quadriceps isometric, terminal knee extension with elastic band, terminal knee extension in supine position, and adductor squeeze in crook lying (squeeze the ball).
Other Names:
  • Simple Conventional Treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS):
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The outcome was the 11-point NPRS to measure pain intensity. The NPRS defines pain intensity from 0 to 10 points, with 0 and 10 points indicating no pain and the most severe pain respectively. The reported test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) was 0.76, demonstrating it to be a good indicator of pain intensity.
6 weeks
Kujala Patellofemoral Pain Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Anterior knee pain scale is frequently referred as Kujala scale. It's a 13 item questionnaire including different items on pain related to function and activities. The items assessed in the questionnaire are patellar subluxation, claudication, pain, walking, climbing stairs and prolonged sitting with the knees flexed. It has a score from 0 to 100 points, where 100 means without pain and functional limitations and 0 means constant pain and various functional limitations.
6 weeks
Y Balance Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The YBT assesses the balance by challenging his postural control system in 3 (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral) of the 8 SEBT (star excursion balance test) directions and has been advocated as a method for assessing dynamic balance (requires strength, flexibility and proprioception). The Y balance score was calculated by dividing the sum of the maximum reach distance in the anterior (A), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions by 3 times the limb length (LL) of the individual, then multiplied by 100.
6 weeks
Navicular Droop Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Position the patient in standing so there is full weight-bearing through the lower extremity and ensure the foot is in the subtalar joint neutral position ("talar head congruent"). Mark the most prominent part of the navicular tuberosity and measure its distance from the supporting surface floor or step. Ask the patient to relax and then measure the amount of sagittal plane excursion of the navicular with a ruler. Alternatively, the test can also be performed in reverse, measuring from relaxed position up to talar neutral in standing postion. Many clinicians also choose to perform this test by marking the start and end position of the navicular on an index card placed along the inside of the foot and then measure the change with a ruler. The ICC2,1 values in the sitting and standing positions were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively, indicating significantly high inter-rater reliability.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Raza, MS-OMPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 7, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Agility Training with Foot mobilization.

Subscribe