The Effect of Kinesiotaping in Pregnant Women

November 27, 2024 updated by: Muhammet Sahin Elbasti, Firat University

The Effect of Kinesiotaping on Clinical Parameters in Pregnant Women With Mechanical Low Back Pain

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of an exercise program combined with Kinesio Taping (KT) and sham KT on clinical parameters in pregnant women with low back pain. A total of 40 participants were included in the study, 20 in the experimental and 20 in the control groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roland Morris Quality of Life Questionnaire and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used as data collection tools. The experimental group received KT and an exercise program, while the control group received sham KT and exercise program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lumbar-sacral spinal pain is a medical and socioeconomic problem affecting approximately 80% of the population. Pregnancy predisposes women to this pain. The most well-known cause of low back pain during pregnancy is an increase in lumbar lordosis, a lordotic syndrome that develops rapidly due to the pregnant uterus and maternal weight gain. This lordotic posture and the related change in load distribution, along with lengthening abdominal muscles and shortening lumbar muscles, create a mechanical disadvantage. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of an exercise program combined with Kinesio Taping (KT) and sham KT on clinical parameters in pregnant women with low back pain. A total of 40 participants were included in the study, 20 in the experimental and 20 in the control groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roland Morris Quality of Life Questionnaire and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used as data collection tools. The experimental group received KT and an exercise program, while the control group received sham KT and exercise program.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Firat University
      • Elazığ, Firat University, Turkey, 23119
        • Muhammet Şahin Elbastı

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20-32-week pregnant women without neurologic deficits
  • Females with mechanical low back pain
  • VAS of at least 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk pregnant women with twin pregnancy
  • Placenta previa
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Threatened preterm delivery
  • Orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases
  • Radiculopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Kinesiotape application
The application was performed using 5 cm x 5 m kinesio tape material. After preparing the standing patient in terms of clothing and skin readiness, the patient was asked to lean forward. To adhere the tape to the right paravertebral region, the lower end of the tape was first adhered 7 cm below the sacroiliac joint at the level of the paravertebral muscles. Then, while the patient was leaning forward, a slight rotation to the left was requested, and in this position, the tape was adhered upwards along the paravertebral muscles without any tension. When applying the tape to the left paravertebral region, the same procedure was mirrored as on the right, with the tape again applied without any tension. The third tape was applied while the patient was standing upright and leaning slightly forward, placed over the sacroiliac joints and parallel to the floor, stretching the tape by 25%.
Other: Kinesiotape
The application was performed using 5 cm x 5 m kinesio tape material. After preparing the standing patient in terms of clothing and skin readiness, the patient was asked to lean forward. To adhere the tape to the right paravertebral region, the lower end of the tape was first adhered 7 cm below the sacroiliac joint at the level of the paravertebral muscles. Then, while the patient was leaning forward, a slight rotation to the left was requested, and in this position, the tape was adhered upwards along the paravertebral muscles without any tension. When applying the tape to the left paravertebral region, the same procedure was mirrored as on the right, with the tape again applied without any tension. The third tape was applied while the patient was standing upright and leaning slightly forward, placed over the sacroiliac joints and parallel to the floor, stretching the tape by 25%.
Sham Comparator: Sham group
Sham Kinesio taping was applied to the patients in the control group. In this sham protocol, Kinesio bands were attached between the 12th rib on both sides and the corresponding sacroiliac joint, passing over the paravertebral muscles without employing any specific banding technique. The third tape was adhered between both sacroiliac joints, also without any adhesive technique. Patients were inquired about any discomfort and informed that the tapes would remain in place until the second session.
Other: Sham (no implant)
Sham Kinesio taping was applied to the patients in the control group. In this sham protocol, Kinesio bands were attached between the 12th rib on both sides and the corresponding sacroiliac joint, passing over the paravertebral muscles without employing any specific banding technique. The third tape was adhered between both sacroiliac joints, also without any adhesive technique. Patients were inquired about any discomfort and informed that the tapes would remain in place until the second session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) has been widely used in numerous studies to assess the intensity of pain and is considered a reliable and valid tool. It measures subjectively perceived pain on a scale resembling a 0-10 cm ruler, with one end representing no pain and the other indicating the most severe pain.
up to 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburgh sleep quality index
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
The sleep quality scale, developed by Buysse et al., had its Turkish reliability and validity study conducted by Agargün et al. (1996) This scale assesses an individual's sleep quality over the past month and includes 24 items. Of these, 19 are self-reported questions answered by the individual, and five are answered by a roommate or spouse.
up to 30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Firat University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 192

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings