Resin-Cement Type Influence on Cement Remnants in Implant-Supported Restorations
Comparison of Two Different Excess Cement Clean-up Options for Cementing Metal-free Ceramic Restorations on Dental Implants
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vilnius, Lithuania, 01362
- Vilnius Implantology Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- physical and psychological ability to undergo implant therapy (ASA I or II)
- presence of a single mandibular molar indicated for extraction with adjacent healthy and present natural teeth or implant-supported restoration
- presence of ≥ 6 mm width and ≥ 10 mm height native bone ridge - presence of intact alveolar bone walls after tooth extraction and presence of interradicular bone > 4 mm to achieve primary implant stability
- presence of ≥ 1.5 mm distance to adjacent teeth at the bone level
- overall healthy, non-inflamed keratinized soft tissues.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of general conditions contributory to dental implant treatment comprising but not limited to:
- presence of active periodontitis 25
- poor oral hygiene as determined by the Oral Health Index (OHI)
- pregnant or lactating
- presence of uncontrolled medical systemic conditions, e.g. diabetes;
- ongoing or past medical treatments affecting wound healing, terminated less than 3 months prior to the study-related intervention
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (RC)
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a self-adhesive resin cement (RC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
|
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a self-adhesive resin cement (RC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
|
|
Experimental: Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
|
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a self-adhesive resin cement (RC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC).
Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relative ratio between the detectable area covered by cement remnants per crown site and the total crown
Time Frame: Crowns were retrieved for analysis immediately after intraoral cementation and residual cement removal.
|
Digital photographs of the specimens were obtained using custom-made equipment with a standardized distance.
The images were analyzed as follows: the contours of the area covered by residual cement were identified visually after optical magnification and marked; the contours comprising the entire surface area of the prosthetic superstructure, i.e. abutment and crown, were determined; the ratio between the area covered with cement and the total surface area per aspect of the specimen was calculated.
|
Crowns were retrieved for analysis immediately after intraoral cementation and residual cement removal.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eglė Vindašiūtė-Narbutė, Vilnius Implantology Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- VIC1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.