SERS-Based Serum Molecular Spectral Screening for Hematogenous Metastasis

March 26, 2025 updated by: Fuzhou General Hospital

SERS-Based Serum Molecular Spectral Screening for Hematogenous Metastasis vs. Non-Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Double-Blind, Independent Data Analysis Clinical Trial

Although modern medicine has made significant progress in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer, most patients are diagnosed at locally advanced stage or with distant metastases, especially in the late stages where the cancer has spread to other organs through hematogenous metastasis. This not only significantly the survival rate of patients but also increases the complexity and difficulty of treatment. Hematogenous metastasis plays an important role in the clinical progression of lung cancer, its complex biological processes pose a huge challenge for clinical management. Early detection of hematogenous metastasis is difficult, and traditional imaging methods have limited sensitivity in detecting small metastatic lesions. The emerging technology of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been limited in clinical application due to its high detection costs and technical requirements. Therefore researching and developing high-sensitivity, high-specificity, simple, easy-to-popularize, and low-cost technologies to predict the risk of hematogenous metastasis lung cancer is crucial for early diagnosis and more precise treatment. Raman spectroscopy (RS), a non-invasive and highly specific molecular detection technology, can detect in biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and sugars related to tumor metabolism in biological samples at the molecular level. Surface-enhanced R spectroscopy (SERS), developed based on this technology, is one of the feasible methods for high-sensitivity biomolecular analysis. Although SERS technology has shown diagnostic results in numerous preclinical studies of various tumors, it is limited by small sample sizes and lacks external validation. Therefore, clinical studies on the diagnosis of tumors Raman spectroscopy are needed, with the following requirements: 1. Objective, rapid, and practical Raman spectroscopy data processing methods are needed, and and deep learning methods may be the best classification methods; 2. Multicenter, large-sample clinical samples are needed to train deep learning diagnostic models, and real-world performance should be validated through external data from prospective studies. In previous study, the investigators collected serum Raman spectroscopy data from a cohort of 23 patients with lung malignancies and developed an intelligent Raman diagnostic system for hematogenous metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on learning models, with an accuracy rate of 95%. To obtain the highest level of clinical evidence and truly achieve clinical translation, this prospective, multicenter clinical aims to validate the use of this intelligent diagnostic system for early diagnosis of hematogenous metastasis in NSCLC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study used a confocal Raman microspectrometer produced by Renishaw, Britain, purchased by the Key Laboratory of the School of Optoelectronics and Engineering of Fujian Normal University. The spectral resolution was 2 cm-1, the excitation wavelength was 785 nm, and a 20x objective Leica microscope was used to collect SERS spectra in the range of 400-1800 cm-1. The excitation irradiation time of each spectrum was 1 s, and the laser power was 30 mW. The measured SERS spectra were collected using the WIRE3.4 (Renishaw) software package. In order to reduce the interference of fluorescence background signals between different spectral lines, the Vancouver Raman Algorithm software (multi-order polynomial fitting algorithm) was used to remove the fluorescence background, remove the baseline and smooth the results. At the same time, in order to avoid changes in peak spectrum intensity caused by instrument performance problems, the spectrum after background subtraction was normalized using NILabVIEW2014 software. Then, the obtained spectral data was analyzed for mean spectrum and charts using Origin, and multivariate statistical analysis was performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Zongyang Yu, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: 22859650 13509327806
  • Email: yuzy527@sina.com

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants were diagnosed with lung malignancy through pathological examination and were able to undergo clinical staging based on TNM.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with Lung cancer meeting the criteria of TNM (Ninth Edition);
  2. Participants are willing to participate in this study and follow the research plan;
  3. Participants or legally authorized representatives can give written informed consent approved by the Ethics Review Committee that manages the website;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with concomitant other malignant tumors;
  2. Participants with missing baseline clinical data;
  3. Participants with severe underlying lung diseases (such as bronchiectasis, bronchial asthma or COPD, etc.), or those with a history of occupational or environmental exposure to dust, mines or asbestos;
  4. Participants who do not cooperate or refuse to participate in clinical trials at a later stage.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients who underwent chest CT scans and were found to have lung nodules
Patients who underwent chest CT scans and were found to have lung nodules and underwent surgical resection
Diagnostic test: Serum Raman spectroscopy intelligent diagnostic system
1. Screening interested participants should sign the appropriate informed consent (ICF) prior to completion any study procedures. 2. The investigator will review symptoms, risk factors, and other non-invasive inclusion and exclusion criteria. 3. The following is the general sequence of events during the 3 months evaluation period: 4. Completion of baseline procedures Participants were assessed for 3 months and completed all safety monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to RAMAN diagnosis
Time Frame: up to 30 days
The time to perform RAMAN testing and obtain diagnostic results after obtaining serum
up to 30 days
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Determine whether there is hematogenous metastasis in enrolled lung cancer patients through RAMAN intelligent diagnostic system
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety assessment Results
Time Frame: up to 30 days
AEs and SAEs through Day 30
up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fuzhou General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024-044

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings