Comparison of the Efficiency of Tissue Adhesive (Periacryl 90) and Silk Suture in Mandibular Impacted Wisdom Surgery
Comparison of the Efficiency of Tissue Adhesive (Periacryl 90) and Silk Suture in Bilateral Mandibular Impacted Wisdom Dental Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Van, Turkey, 65080
- Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years who accepted the study conditions and had bilateral, bone or mucosal retention, and completely impacted wisdom teeth in the similar position with an indication for extraction due to prophylactic or orthodontic treatment in the lower jaw were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with any systemic disease
- Individuals with a history of allergy to the drugs to be used in the study
- Pregnant and breastfeeding individuals
- Individuals with pain, swelling or trismus in the last 10 days
- Individuals with different positions on the right and left sides
- Individuals who did not sign the voluntary consent form
- Individuals with pathology in the impacted tooth area
- Individuals with limited mouth opening
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90)
After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using tissue adhesive.
|
One of the most frequently performed procedures in maxillofacial surgery is impacted wisdom tooth surgery.
An impacted tooth is defined as a tooth that is not fully or partially erupted and is blocked from eruption by another tooth, bone, or soft tissue, and thus has a low probability of eruption.
The tooth is blocked from eruption by adjacent hard or soft tissue, including bone or dense soft tissue.
The most common complications after impacted wisdom tooth surgery are pain, edema, trismus, and alveolar osteitis.
|
|
Active Comparator: Silk suture
After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using silk sutures.
|
One of the most frequently performed procedures in maxillofacial surgery is impacted wisdom tooth surgery.
An impacted tooth is defined as a tooth that is not fully or partially erupted and is blocked from eruption by another tooth, bone, or soft tissue, and thus has a low probability of eruption.
The tooth is blocked from eruption by adjacent hard or soft tissue, including bone or dense soft tissue.
The most common complications after impacted wisdom tooth surgery are pain, edema, trismus, and alveolar osteitis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Edema
Time Frame: 3. and 7. days
|
In order to evaluate edema, the distances between points marked extra orally in 5 different regions on the face were measured and recorded in mm (angulus-tragus point, angulus-lateral corner of the eye, angulus-nasal wing, angulus-lateral commissure, angulus-pogonion point).
|
3. and 7. days
|
|
Trismus
Time Frame: 3. and 7. days
|
The evaluation of trismus was evaluated by measuring the mouth opening before the operation and also on the 3rd and 7th days after the operation.
The patients were asked to open their mouths as much as possible and the distance between the incisal edges of the lower and upper central incisors was measured in millimeters with the help of a precision ruler.
This process was repeated 3 times for each measurement and the arithmetic average of the values found was taken.
|
3. and 7. days
|
|
Wound Healing
Time Frame: 3. and 7. days
|
All patients were called for follow-up visits on the 3rd day and 1 week later and were examined by the same physician.
During the follow-up visits, the status of wound healing was evaluated in 3 different statuses.
These 3 statuses were recorded as good, acceptable and poor.
Wound healing deteriorated from good to poor.
|
3. and 7. days
|
|
VAS Pain Scor
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days.
|
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used for pain assessment.
VAS pain assessment includes scores between 0 and 10. (0: no pain; 10: unbearable pain.)
As the score increases, the pain worsens.
|
3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Arotiba GT, Ogunlewe MO. Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swelling and trismus following third molar surgery. Head Face Med. 2005 Nov 7;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-11.
- Ali AS, Benton JA, Yates JM. Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Mar;45(3):250-257. doi: 10.1111/joor.12589. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
- Bao Z, Gao M, Sun Y, Nian R, Xian M. The recent progress of tissue adhesives in design strategies, adhesive mechanism and applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Jun;111:110796. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110796. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
- Bal-Ozturk A, Cecen B, Avci-Adali M, Topkaya SN, Alarcin E, Yasayan G, Ethan YC, Bulkurcuoglu B, Akpek A, Avci H, Shi K, Shin SR, Hassan S. Tissue Adhesives: From Research to Clinical Translation. Nano Today. 2021 Feb;36:101049. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101049. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
- Ballestas SA, Turner TC, Kamalakar A, Stephenson YC, Willett NJ, Goudy SL, Botchwey EA. Improving hard palate wound healing using immune modulatory autotherapies. Acta Biomater. 2019 Jun;91:209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.052. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
- Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0. Epub 2018 May 2.
- Amiel GE, Sukhotnik I, Kawar B, Siplovich L. Use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in elective surgical incisions--longterm outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00068-x.
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Ad Hoc Committee on Pedodontic Radiology; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and persons with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent. 2005-2006;27(7 Suppl):185-6. No abstract available.
- Al-Moraissi EA, Al-Zendani EA, Al-Selwi AM. Efficacy of Submucosal Injection of Chymotrypsin, Oral Serratiopeptidase or Oral Dexamethasone in Reducing Postoperative Complications Following Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial. Front Oral Health. 2020 Dec 8;1:575176. doi: 10.3389/froh.2020.575176. eCollection 2020.
- Akbulut N, Ustuner E, Atakan C, Colok G. Comparison of the effect of naproxen, etodolac and diclofenac on postoperative sequels following third molar surgery: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Mar 1;19(2):e149-56. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19518.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- YYU-04/18.05.2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.