Sevoflurane and Dexmedetomidine's Contrasting Renal Impacts After Non-Cardiac Surgery

November 28, 2025 updated by: Mohammed Lotfy, Tanta University

Contradictory Effect of Sevoflurane and Dexmedetomidine on Kidney Function After Non-Cardiac Surgical Procedures Possibly Through Immunomodulation and Adjustment of Redox Milieu

Postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) is a significant complication, especially after complex surgeries. The choice of anesthetic may influence PO-AKI risk. While sevoflurane (SEVO) has been associated with potential renal risks, dexmedetomidine (DXM) has demonstrated renoprotective effects in various surgical settings. These protective effects may be linked to DXM's immunomodulatory properties and influence on the redox balance. Given the common use of SEVO in major non-cardiac surgery and the potential for renal vulnerability, particularly in the elderly, this study hypothesizes that perioperative DXM infusion in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery with SEVO anesthesia will reduce the incidence and severity of PO-AKI, especially in those with pre-existing or borderline renal dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • El Gharbyia
      • Tanta, El Gharbyia, Egypt, 13511
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who were assigned for TKR surgery;
  • Patients with preoperative serum creatinine (SCr) levels of <1.1 mg/ml;
  • Patients with controlled medical conditions;
  • Patients free of exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients were excluded to guard against the impact of senile prostatic hypertrophy on kidney functions;
  • Patients who had preoperative SCr of >1.1 mg/dl;
  • Presence of any urological disorders, urological stone diseases;
  • Patients with autoimmune diseases, medical disorders requiring maintenance on immunosuppressant therapy;
  • Patients with cancer anywhere in the body were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: SEVO Group
Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product
Anesthesia was induced by fentanyl 1 μg/kg/min, propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg, then tracheal intubation was aided by gentle tracheal pressure and an endotracheal tube of appropriate size was inserted with the aid of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and patients were mechanically ventilated to keep ETCO2 in the range of 30-35 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained for patients of both groups by sevoflurane 2% in oxygen 100% and rocuronium (0.15 mg/ kg) according to the requirements.
Active Comparator: DXM Group
Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product
Anesthesia was induced by fentanyl 1 μg/kg/min, propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg, then tracheal intubation was aided by gentle tracheal pressure and an endotracheal tube of appropriate size was inserted with the aid of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and patients were mechanically ventilated to keep ETCO2 in the range of 30-35 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained for patients of both groups by sevoflurane 2% in oxygen 100% and rocuronium (0.15 mg/ kg) according to the requirements.
Drug: Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine (Precedex, 100 µg/ml; Rewine Pharmaceutical; Varachha, Seurat, Gujarat) was administered before induction of anesthesia in the form of a 1 µg/kg; loading dose. The loading dose was diluted with 10 ml of normal saline and injected slowly for 10 minutes. IO infusion was prepared to provide 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h, initially the lowest possible dose was infused and was increased gradually to control IO stress reflexes but with MAP, and HR monitoring to guard against IO hypotension and bradycardia. PO infusion was prepared to provide DXM in a dose of 0.15 µg/kg/h for 24-h. Placebo 0.9% saline solution was provided to patients of the SEVO group at a similar rate and duration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Difference in Serum Creatinine levels After Dexmedetomidine Administration in Total Knee Replacement surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia.
Time Frame: 5 months
The study assesses the mean percentage difference of serum creatinine levels in patients who was undergoing total knee replacement under sevoflurane anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine infusion (using standard laboratory assays).
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tanta University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 36264PR666/4/24

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings