Dual-energy SPEctral CT to Evaluate Response to First-line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell REnal Cancer (SPECTRE)

March 6, 2025 updated by: IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Dual-energy SPEctral CT to Evaluate Response to New First-line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell REnal Cancer and the Association of Its Parameters With Molecular Alterations

To evaluate the utility of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (CT) scan in monitoring treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. In particular, to analyze the use of spectral CT in patients who are candidates to receive first-line treatment based on combinations of immunotherapy and molecularly targeted drugs. In particular, the parameters derived from the use of this technology and their variation during therapy will be analyzed together with some possible molecular alterations highlighted by the analysis of the tumor tissue previously taken from the patient, relating them to the response to first-line therapy with immuno-combinations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

In the field of kidney cancer, where PET with FDG or other tracers is not valid due to the high number of false negatives, new techniques for radiological evaluation of the disease are a clinical necessity. The evaluation of parameters derived from the use of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (CT), such as IC and Zeffective, at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of systemic treatment, could provide useful information on how tumor structure (in particular vascularization) evolves during therapy with IO+IO or IO+TKI. In addition, the variation of these parameters could be associated with different outcomes in terms of ORR, PFS and OS. One aspect evaluated is the existence of a correlation between the presence of abundant tumor vascularization (or on the contrary poor vascularization), determined by dual-energy spectral CT, and the response in terms of ORR and PFS at 3 and 6 months to combinations containing IO+TKI or immunotherapy alone. For prognostic and predictive purposes, the study also intends to verify whether there is a correlation between the presence of gene alterations, CT-derived parameters and response to therapies. The prognostic role of some molecular alterations (ATM, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, MTOR, NF2, PBRM1, PIK3CA, PTEN, SETD2, SMARCB1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, VHL) will be evaluated and their potential predictive value will be analyzed to understand whether a given mutational structure may be more or less responsive to specific types of treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Bologna
    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • Irccs Azienda Ospedaliero Universitario Di Bologna
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC and who comply with study inclusion and exclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of clear cell RCC
  • Patients with metastatic disease documented by imaging or biopsy of the secondary site
  • Patients who have not had previous treatment for RCC
  • Patients with an indication for first-line medical treatment based on IO+TKI, IO+IO as per clinical practice at the Medical Oncology Unit of the IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna
  • Patients who have already had a dual-energy spectral total-body CT with MDC within 4 weeks of treatment initiation
  • Availability of a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological block (FFPE) stored for a period <15 years, for the execution of molecular analysis for the search for alterations of the genes ATM, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, MTOR, NF2, PBRM1, PIK3CA, PTEN, SETD2, SMARCB1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, VHL
  • Patients who knowingly express consent to participate in the study after signing the consent

Exclusion Criteria

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response to first-line drug therapy (with immuno-combinations) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6 months of systemic therapy
IC and Zeffective parameters will be compared between responders and non-responders. the outcome studied will be the Overall Response Rate (ORR) assessed radiologically according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
From enrollment to 6 months of systemic therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 12 months of sistemic therapy
for prognostic value of dual-energy spectral CT-derived parameters: Overall Survival (OS) at 12 months For prognostic impact of molecular alterations: OS at 12 months after initiation of therapy.
From enrollment to 12 months of sistemic therapy
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6 months of sistemic therapy
for prognostic value of dual-energy spectral CT-derived parameters: Overall Survival (OS) at 12 months and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 6 months after initiation of therapy.
From enrollment to 6 months of sistemic therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Massari, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 18, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SPECTRE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings