Effectiveness of a Standardized Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Program with Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment Stratification
Effectiveness of a Standardized Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Program with Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment Stratification: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Tai Po Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- first stroke, able to attend gym training and give written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- unstable medical condition, any musculoskeletal conditions or other diseases restricted upper limb training, unfit mental state and unable to follow command
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Standardized upper limb rehabilitation program
A new stroke upper limb rehabilitation program was designed.
Participants were classified into 3 categories based on their level of upper limb impairment reflected by the baseline S-FM score (severe 0-4, moderate 5-8, mild 9-12).
Upper limb training was provided according to the standardized treatment choices preset with expert opinions
|
Intervention selection included stretching and mobilization exercise, strengthening exercise, electrical stimulation, acupuncture, functional or task specific training and mirror therapy.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional upper limb training
Treatments were prescribed based on the corporate stroke rehabilitation protocol of Hong Kong Hospital Authority.
The protocol allowed variations in clinical practice and ultimate decision about a particular clinical treatment depended on each individual patient's condition and clinical judgment of individual therapists.
|
Intervention selection included stretching and mobilization exercise, strengthening exercise, electrical stimulation, acupuncture, functional or task specific training and mirror therapy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment (S-FM)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
S-FM consisted of six items examining upper extremity movements (shoulder elevation, shoulder flexion 90° to 180°, elbow extension, elbow 90° pronation/supination, elbow 90° wrist flexion/extension and grasp, adduct thumb).
Each item was scored with an ordinal scale of 0 (unable to perform), 1 (partially performed) and 2 (fully performed).
The total score was 12.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
|
Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
FTHUE consisted of 18 activities examining upper extremity function.
Seven levels with 1-3 activities in each level in a hierarchy sequence of difficulty were adopted.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
MBI consisted of 11 items examining ADL including self-care, continence and locomotion.
A modified scoring system with 5 codes (unable to perform task, attempts task but unsafe, moderate help required, minimal help required and fully independent) was adopted for each item, giving a total score from 0 to 100 (0= fully dependent, 100= fully independent).
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Esterman AJ. Standardizing the approach to evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):432-40. doi: 10.1310/tsr2005-432.
- Garcia-Vega J, Gregory G, Lind CRP, Singer BJ. Development of a consensus approach to upper limb rehabilitation early post stroke amongst a cohort of Western Australian therapists. N Z J Physiother 2016;44(3):133-147
- Hirayama K, Takebayashi T, Takahashi K. Factors Influencing Decision-Making for Poststroke Paretic Upper Limb Treatment: A Survey of Japanese Physical and Occupational Therapists. Occup Ther Int. 2024 Oct 7;2024:1854449. doi: 10.1155/2024/1854449. eCollection 2024.
- Hsieh YW, Hsueh IP, Chou YT, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Kwakkel G. Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2007 Nov;38(11):3052-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490730. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CREC2022.343-T
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.