Fentanyl Versus Midazolam as an Adjunct to Spinal Anesthesia (Spinal Block)

April 7, 2025 updated by: Omar Rajab, Makassed General Hospital

Fentanyl Versus Midazolam During Spinal Block With Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery: a Prospective Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

It is well documented in the practice of anesthesia the effectiveness of bupivacaine when added with other adjuvants including midazolam, opioids, and ketamine during neuraxial spinal block for cesarean delivery, however comparison of the superiority of midazolam 2mg over fentanyl 25 micrograms or vice versa with bupivacaine during cesarean delivery has not been established and if performed diligently, could potentially change our understanding and current practice for better patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A study published on Jan - Feb 2024 has compared adjuvants fentanyl 25 micrograms and midazolam 2mg when added to Levobupivacaine for patients undergoing cesarean section with Midazolam being the superior drug of choice with less side effects. [1] Another study done around our locality at the American University of Beirut compared the postoperative analgesic effect of ketamine and fentanyl when added to bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean section with results conclusive of equally effective post cesarean pain control. [2] One study compared intrathecal midazolam 2mg with intrathecal fentanyl 12.5 micrograms with bupivacaine [3], and results elucidated equal surgical analgesia during the operation in contrast to the superior Midazolam 2mg vs the intrathecal fentanyl 25 micrograms when added to levobupivacaine mentioned in the first study. Current literature is void of studies comparing intrathecal fentanyl 25 micrograms vs intrathecal midazolam 2mg when added to bupivacaine for cesarean delivery.

Study objectives:

Comparative studies are available for different adjuvants when administered along with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine, but the specific aim and target of this study is to compare Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% 12.5 mg with fentanyl 25 micrograms (2 ml) versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% 12.5 mg with midazolam 2mg (2 ml) for cesarean delivery.

Levobupivacaine is not as readily available as bupivacaine in our population. Opioids have significantly more side effects when administered intrathecally including pruritus, respiratory depression, post operatively nausea and vomiting, and any attempt to decrease their usage to improve patient satisfaction without compromising the overall analgesic effect should be pursued. The results from this study could potentially change current practice in our hospital and across local and national areas respectively.

This study aims to provide conclusive data about the superiority of midazolam in reduction of postoperative pain, reduction of postoperative rescue analgesia, the quality of sensory block, and the reduction in side effects when administered with Bupivacaine as opposed to Levobupivacaine which was demonstrated in the study [1] mentioned above.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Lebanon
      • Beirut, Lebanon, 00000
        • Makassed General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-45 with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) class II will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with history of opioid substance abuse
  • pre-eclampsia or eclampsia
  • Gestational Hypertension
  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • significant cardiac, renal, and hepatic morbidity (i.e., ASA class III patients).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Intrathecal Fentanyl
Drug: Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl
25 mcg Fentanyl 12.5 mg Bupivacaine
Active Comparator: Intrathecal Midazolam
Drug: Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Midazolam
2 Mg Midazolam 12.5 mg Bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 Hours
The primary outcome is the timing of the first analgesia requested postoperatively (i.e., the rescue analgesia).
24 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Makassed General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MGH-07-24001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Female Volunteer

Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings