Efficacy of Triple-daily 15mA tACS on Adolescent NSSI

June 11, 2025 updated by: Tianhong ZHANG, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Efficacy of Triple-daily 15mA Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Adolescent Non-suicidal Self-injury (NSSI): a Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

In order to assess the clinical efficacy of triple-daily 15mA-tACS stimulation by comparing the effects of active and sham tACS interventions on driving improvements in adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury(NSSI), participants will be randomly assigned to either the active or sham tACS group. This trial consists of a 2-week intensified intervention phase (40 sessions), followed by a 4-week observation period. The key hypothesis is that triple-daily 15mA-tACS stimulation will enhance clinical recovery compared to sham stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recognizing the clinical shortcomings of traditional methods for adolescent NSSI, study objective is to establish evidence supporting the efficacy of a triple-daily 15mA-tACS stimulation regimen targeting the forehead and both mastoids. This intervention will be administered five days a week over a four-week treatment period, with the aim of eliciting substantial clinical improvements in adolescent NSSI compared to a sham intervention. On the first day of the intervention, participants will receive a tACS session, followed by triple-daily tACS sessions administered for 13 consecutive days. Following the completion of treatment, participants will undergo follow-up observations every 7 days for 4 weeks. EEG and ECG recordings will be obtained at baseline, on day 1 after the first session, at the end of the 2-week intervention period (after 40 sessions), and at the 6-week follow-up. Throughout the sessions, all evaluations will be conducted under standardized conditions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of NSSI based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria section 3 diagnostic criteria.
  • Five or more NSSI episodes in the past year and at least one NSSI episode in the past month.
  • Age between 12 and 21 years.
  • Informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
  • Informed consent from participants aged 15 years and above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or history of organic brain disorders or neurological disorders.
  • Elevated or imminent suicidal risk, as assessed by clinicians during routine screening.
  • Previous or current exposure to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), modified ECT, TMS, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), tACS, or other neurostimulation treatments.
  • Presence of cochlear implants, cardiac pacemakers, implanted devices, or metal in the brain.
  • Previous or current use of psychotropic medication.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Participation in another concurrent clinical trial.
  • Refusal to provide informed consent to participate in the trial.
  • Other circumstances deemed unsuitable for participation by researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: the active-tACS group
This trial consists of a 2-week intensified intervention phase (40 sessions), followed by a 4-week observation period. On the first day of the intervention, participants will receive a tACS session, followed by triple-daily tACS sessions administered for 13 consecutive days.
Device: Active-tACS
Participants were comfortably positioned on a lounge chair and received alternating current stimulation using an FDA-approved tACS device (Nexalin Technology, Inc., Houston, TX, USA). Electrodes were evenly placed across the forehead and mastoid regions. Trained nurses administered the tACS according to standardized protocols.
Sham Comparator: the sham-tACS group
Participants in the sham-tACS group will undergo the same protocol, utilizing a sham tACS incapable of delivering active stimulation. They will be kept unaware of their assigned treatment.
Device: Sham-tACS
The sham tACS device will resemble the active stimulation device in appearance, weight, size, color, and odor, ensuring indistinguishability for the patients. Throughout the entire intervention period, each participant will be allocated to the same tACS device, regardless of whether it delivers active or sham stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total NSSI incidents during the 4-week follow-up period post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 weeks
It will be determined by the Suicide and Self-Injury Behavior Interview-Revised (SITBI-R). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% decrease in NSSI frequency within the past month at Day 42, as measured by the SITBI-R. A threshold of 50% reduction was selected based on its clinical relevance as an indicator of intervention efficacy.
6 weeks
Change in mean NSSI severity levels during the 4-week follow-up period post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 weeks
It will be determined by the Suicide and Self-Injury Behavior Interview-Revised (SITBI-R). The SITBI-R assesses NSSI severity using a 5-point scale (minimum = 1, maximum = 5), where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes: Level 1 (mild NSSI without skin damage) to Level 5 (severe NSSI requiring medical intervention). Comparative analysis of severity-level changes between the active-tACS and sham-tACS groups will be conducted at the 4-week follow-up post-intervention.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Mental Health Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: TianHong Zhang, Doctor, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024y1023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings