pBFS Guided aiTBS Over Language Network for ASD Child

May 7, 2025 updated by: Beijing Changping Tianhe Research Institute of Brain Science

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Personalized Brain Functional Sectors (pBFS) for Language Deficit Comorbid in Autism Spectrum Disorder Child: a Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of precision neuromodulation in improving language ability in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who also have language development delay. The neuromodulation will be delivered using the accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) protocol, targeting the language network in the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG), guided by personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technology.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder often accompanied by language delay. Emerging evidence indicates that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been effective in restoring language ability in post-stroke aphasia, but its efficacy in developmental language disorders remains unknown.

By leveraging the personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technique and task-free functional MRI scans, we can accurately locate the individual language function brain network. Considering the accessibility and comfort of neuromodulation, we will stimulate the language network node in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) for 12 weeks.

In this study, participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to either the active or sham iTBS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) groups at a ratio of 2:1. The treatment protocol lasts for 12 weeks, with sessions held 5 days a week and 3 iTBS sessions over the SFG per day. The inter-session interval is set at 50 minutes, along with speech therapy. Clinical evaluations focusing on language and ASD symptoms will be conducted at baseline, after the 12-week treatment period, and at 24-week follow-up after the start of treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Sixth Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Li Yang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Professionally diagnosed with ASD per DSM - 5 criteria.
  2. Aged 3 - 6.5 years, either gender.
  3. ADOS-2 results meet ASD standard cut - off.
  4. SCQ score: ≥15 (age ≥ 4 years) or ≥11 (age < 4 years).
  5. Co-existing language disorder not explaining ASD symptoms. No organic speech organ lesions. CNBS-R2016 and CLAS-TP language-related equivalent age > 18 months; any CLAS-TP dimension score < 6.
  6. Mandarin is the daily communication language.
  7. May have intellectual/global developmental delay not explaining ASD symptoms.
  8. Guardians volunteer, can cooperate in treatment and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Identified genetic pathogenic factors; current/past comorbid severe disorders (ADHD, Tourette's, etc.).
  2. Serious self-harm in the past year.
  3. Severe sensory/motor disorders precluding cooperation.
  4. History of epileptic seizures.
  5. Serious organic diseases, especially brain related.
  6. Contraindications for MRI/TMS (metal/implants).
  7. Respiratory/circulatory diseases with sedation risk.
  8. Illiterate guardians unable to handle informed consent/questionnaires.
  9. Received neuromodulation in the past 3 months.
  10. Currently in other clinical trials.
  11. Deemed unfit by the researcher.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: active iTBS group
active iTBS over SFG
Device: active iTBS
Participants will undergo three iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.
Behavioral: speech therapy
Speech therapy will be delivered between iTBS/sham sessions. Two 30-minutes trainings every day.
Sham Comparator: Sham group
sham iTBS over SFG
Behavioral: speech therapy
Speech therapy will be delivered between iTBS/sham sessions. Two 30-minutes trainings every day.
Device: Sham iTBS
Participants will undergo three sham iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Sham stimulation will be delivered through a sham coil with the identical appearance as real coil. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CLAS-TP score change after treatment
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)
The score changes of combined CLAS-TP (Child Language Assessment Scale - Test for Preschoolers) score at 12-week from baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CLAS-TP total score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
CLAS-TP subscale score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

For the story comprehension subscale, only participants who had non-zero point were included.

Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
WPPSI language score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
ADOS-2 SA score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SCQ score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
ATEC score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
CBCL score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
QoL score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Changping Tianhe Research Institute of Brain Science

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NGASD002DMC_150

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on active iTBS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings