pBFS Guided aiTBS Over Language Network for ASD Child

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Personalized Brain Functional Sectors (pBFS) for Language Deficit Comorbid in Autism Spectrum Disorder Child: a Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of precision neuromodulation in improving language ability in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who also have language development delay. The neuromodulation will be delivered using the accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) protocol, targeting the language network in the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG), guided by personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technology.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder often accompanied by language delay. Emerging evidence indicates that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been effective in restoring language ability in post-stroke aphasia, but its efficacy in developmental language disorders remains unknown.

By leveraging the personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technique and task-free functional MRI scans, we can accurately locate the individual language function brain network. Considering the accessibility and comfort of neuromodulation, we will stimulate the language network node in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) for 12 weeks.

In this study, participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to either the active or sham iTBS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) groups at a ratio of 2:1. The treatment protocol lasts for 12 weeks, with sessions held 5 days a week and 3 iTBS sessions over the SFG per day. The inter-session interval is set at 50 minutes, along with speech therapy. Clinical evaluations focusing on language and ASD symptoms will be conducted at baseline, after the 12-week treatment period, and at 24-week follow-up after the start of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Sixth Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Li Yang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Professionally diagnosed with ASD per DSM - 5 criteria.
  2. Aged 3 - 6.5 years, either gender.
  3. ADOS-2 results meet ASD standard cut - off.
  4. SCQ score: ≥15 (age ≥ 4 years) or ≥11 (age < 4 years).
  5. Co-existing language disorder not explaining ASD symptoms. No organic speech organ lesions. CNBS-R2016 and CLAS-TP language-related equivalent age > 18 months; any CLAS-TP dimension score < 6.
  6. Mandarin is the daily communication language.
  7. May have intellectual/global developmental delay not explaining ASD symptoms.
  8. Guardians volunteer, can cooperate in treatment and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Identified genetic pathogenic factors; current/past comorbid severe disorders (ADHD, Tourette's, etc.).
  2. Serious self-harm in the past year.
  3. Severe sensory/motor disorders precluding cooperation.
  4. History of epileptic seizures.
  5. Serious organic diseases, especially brain related.
  6. Contraindications for MRI/TMS (metal/implants).
  7. Respiratory/circulatory diseases with sedation risk.
  8. Illiterate guardians unable to handle informed consent/questionnaires.
  9. Received neuromodulation in the past 3 months.
  10. Currently in other clinical trials.
  11. Deemed unfit by the researcher.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active iTBS group
active iTBS over SFG
Participants will undergo three iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.
Speech therapy will be delivered between iTBS/sham sessions. Two 30-minutes trainings every day.
Sham Comparator: Sham group
sham iTBS over SFG
Speech therapy will be delivered between iTBS/sham sessions. Two 30-minutes trainings every day.
Participants will undergo three sham iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Sham stimulation will be delivered through a sham coil with the identical appearance as real coil. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CLAS-TP score change after treatment
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)
The score changes of combined CLAS-TP (Child Language Assessment Scale - Test for Preschoolers) score at 12-week from baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CLAS-TP total score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
CLAS-TP subscale score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

For the story comprehension subscale, only participants who had non-zero point were included.

Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
WPPSI language score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
ADOS-2 SA score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SCQ score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
ATEC score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
CBCL score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
QoL score change from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on active iTBS

Subscribe