Comparison of Recurrence Rate of Keloid After Excision Between Intra-operative Steroid Injection and Steroid With Platelet-rich Plasma Injection Combination Therapy

May 1, 2025 updated by: Chanokchon Kongkergkiat, Ramathibodi Hospital
Keloid scars are benign skin lesions characterized by excessive collagen deposition, and their treatment remains challenging due to a high recurrence rate even after surgical excision. Combination therapies have been shown to be more effective than monotherapy. A common approach for treating recurrent keloids is surgical excision followed by intralesional corticosteroid injection; however, recurrence rates remain substantial. This study was conducted to evaluate the recurrence rate of keloid scars following surgical excision combined with intralesional corticosteroid and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, compared to corticosteroid injection alone administered intraoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
212

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10140
        • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Having keloid scars less than 10 centimeters in length
  • Undergoing complete keloid excision (extralesional excision)
  • Undergoing surgery under local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently receiving immunosuppressive drugs or systemic steroids
  • Patients with chronic diseases under active treatment, such as tuberculosis
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients likely to have poor treatment adherence, such as those with cancer, epilepsy, or psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with vascular diseases or hematologic/coagulation abnormalities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Intra-operative corticosteroid injection
Intra-operative corticosteroid injection alone was administered around the surgical wound using triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). The injection was performed into the intradermal layer using a 30G needle, immediately after keloid excision and wound closure. The medication was injected along the wound edges following the suture line, at a dosage of 0.1 ml per 1 centimeter of wound length.
Drug: Intra-operative corticosteroid injection
Intra-operative corticosteroid injection alone was administered around the surgical wound using triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). The injection was performed into the intradermal layer using a 30G needle, immediately after keloid excision and wound closure. The medication was injected along the wound edges following the suture line, at a dosage of 0.1 ml per 1 centimeter of wound length.
Experimental: Combined Intra-operative platelet-rich plasma with corticosteroid injection
Combined Intra-operative platelet-rich plasma with corticosteroid injection was administered around the surgical wound. Each patient had 10 ml of blood collected into a RegenKit A-PRP tube. The blood-filled tube was then placed into a RegenLab PRP centrifuge and spun for approximately 5 minutes to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP), yielding around 5 ml of injectable PRP. Once prepared, the PRP was stored in the collection tube and used within 4 hours from the time of blood draw to the time of injection. After the keloid excision and wound closure were completed, the PRP was aseptically aspirated from the tube using a sterile needle and injected into the intradermal layer along the wound edges using a 30G needle. The injection was performed in a sterile manner, with a dosage of 0.5 ml of PRP per 1 centimeter of wound length. For corticosteroid administration, triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml) was used. The medication was injected into the intradermal layer using a 30G needle along the
Biological: Combined Intra-operative platelet-rich plasma with corticosteroid injection
Combined Intra-operative platelet-rich plasma with corticosteroid injection was administered around the surgical wound. Each patient had 10 ml of blood collected into a RegenKit A-PRP tube. The blood-filled tube was then placed into a RegenLab PRP centrifuge and spun for approximately 5 minutes to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP), yielding around 5 ml of injectable PRP. Once prepared, the PRP was stored in the collection tube and used within 4 hours from the time of blood draw to the time of injection. After the keloid excision and wound closure were completed, the PRP was aseptically aspirated from the tube using a sterile needle and injected into the intradermal layer along the wound edges using a 30G needle. The injection was performed in a sterile manner, with a dosage of 0.5 ml of PRP per 1 centimeter of wound length. For corticosteroid administration, triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml) was used. The medication was injected into the intradermal layer using a 30G needle along the

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate of keloid
Time Frame: Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Vancouver scar scale
Within 12 months after end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Itching at scar
Time Frame: Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Patient reported outcome using a questionnaire interview
Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Pain at scar
Time Frame: Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Patient reported outcome using a questionnaire interview
Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Skin atrophy
Time Frame: Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Clinical examination
Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Skin telangiectasia
Time Frame: Within 12 months after end of the intervention
Clinical examination
Within 12 months after end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ramathibodi Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MURA2024/502

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings