Thopaz for PALs Evaluation

March 15, 2026 updated by: Kai Swenson

Utility of the Thopaz+ System in Evaluating Persistent Air Leaks

Persistent air leaks (PALs) are a common postoperative complication resulting from tears in the visceral pleura or peripheral lung resections. Although highly prevalent with significant consequences, traditional assessment methods lack the capability to objectively quantify air leaks, which further complicates management, results in inconsistent decision making, and prolongs hospital stays. By incorporating the Thopaz+ system, the investigators can introduce a reliable approach to objectively quantify air leaks, potentially improving clinical outcomes.

The purpose of this protocol is to perform a pilot prospective controlled clinical trial to evaluate the utility of incorporating the Thopaz+ system and its volume quantification ability in evaluating patients with persistent air leaks (PALs) to guide treatment decisions, specifically endobronchial valves (EBVs).

In the targeted cohort, the Thopaz+ will be connected to the chest tube and the data collected will be combined with that of serial balloon occlusion testing with a Fogarty balloon to accurately localize the air leak source, and subsequently consider the correct placement of EBVs. The investigators will thereby determine whether this experimental strategy will yield a more accurate and objective assessment of air leaks, facilitating timely interventions and improved patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a prospective controlled clinical trial. The investigators' target demographic includes all adult patients with lung resection and/or non-lung resection-related PAL with ipsilateral chest tubes who were not candidates for surgical intervention or patients who refused the intervention. These patients would undergo a multidisciplinary review by thoracic surgery, interventional pulmonary and the primary care team to consider a bronchoscopic approach with endobronchial valves and possibly bronchial blood patch, which is currently considered standard of care at our institution. During this standard-of-care intervention, quantitative assessment of distal occluded airway pressures/flows in various airways, as well as quantitative assessment of air leak volume will be assessed.

In current medical practice, when EBVs are considered in the context of managing PALs, bronchoscopists may opt to either conduct complete lobar occlusion (sealing of all segments within the target lobe) or segmental occlusion (sealing only selected segments within the target lobe). The decision is usually guided by localizing the source of air leak which is usually done by monitoring the reduction of air leak on the pleural drainage device following serial inflation of a Fogarty Catheter at various locations within the endobronchial tree and monitoring change in air leak visually in the pleural drainage system.

In this trial, patients with PALs will have their chest tubes connected to the Thopaz+ system. The Thopaz+ will continuously quantify the volume of air leaks, providing real-time data for analysis.

Data from both the Thopaz+ and standard serial occlusion test with Fogarty balloon will be combined and integrated to provide a comprehensive assessment of the air leak source. The bronchoscopist will perform standard visual assessment of changes in air leak during serial balloon occlusion in order to identify the best region for endobronchial treatments; use of measurements from the Thopaz and serial balloon occlusion test will be allowed as part of clinical reasoning but are not required to be used by the treating clinician.

Continuous monitoring using the Thopaz+ system may continue post-procedure to track changes in air leak volumes and patient recovery, ensuring timely interventions and optimal patient outcomes. This integrated approach aims to provide a more accurate, objective, and efficient method of managing PALs compared to traditional techniques.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All study subjects will be patients who meet the inclusion criteria including a willingness to read, understand, and sign the informed consent. Recruitment of study subjects will be from the pool of admitted patients from our inpatient service. They will be recruited in a consecutive fashion from the clinical practices of the investigators from BIDMC.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalized with a persistent air leak (PAL) lasting ≥5 days despite continuous chest tube drainage.
  • Undergoing bronchoscopy as part of clinical care for PAL management.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to bronchoscopy or EBV placement.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Inability to tolerate general anesthesia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Successful Intraoperative Quantification of Air Leak Volume Using Thopaz+ Digital Drainage System
Time Frame: During procedure
Feasibility will be defined by the ability to obtain continuous, interpretable quantitative air leak volume data (in mL/min) during bronchoscopic evaluation of persistent air leaks. Successful quantification is defined as capturing measurable air leak volume data during serial balloon occlusion in at least one airway segment. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with successful measurements out of the total enrolled population.
During procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with identifiable lobar or segmental airways responsible for PAL
Time Frame: During procedure
Percentage of patients with identifiable lobar or segmental airways responsible for PAL
During procedure
Maximum decrease in volume of air leak during serial balloon occlusion, as measured by Thopaz+ device
Time Frame: During procedure
During procedure
Treatment success: decrease of one grade in Cerfolio classification for air leaks or removal of continuous suction from chest drain.
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
The Cerfolio classification categorizes air leaks based on their occurrence during the respiratory cycle, with grades 1-4 indicating increasing severity. Grade 1 is a forced expiratory leak, seen during coughing; Grade 2, expiratory; Grade 3, inspiratory; and Grade 4, continuous during both inspiration and expiration
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
Treatment failure: no decrease in the degree of the air leak (Cerfolio classification) and the need for continuous suction for chest drain
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
Length of stay following EBV placement
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
Duration of chest tube following bronchoscopy
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
Change in Air Leak Severity Graded by Cerfolio Classification
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
The Cerfolio classification categorizes air leaks based on their occurrence during the respiratory cycle, with grades 1-4 indicating increasing severity. Grade 1 is a forced expiratory leak, seen during coughing; Grade 2, expiratory; Grade 3, inspiratory; and Grade 4, continuous during both inspiration and expiration
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
Change in Quantitative Air Leak Volume Measured by Thopaz+ Digital Drainage System
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
The Thopaz+ device will be used to continuously measure the volume of air leak (in mL/min) before and after bronchoscopic intervention. The outcome will report the change in air leak volume from baseline (pre-bronchoscopy) to post-bronchoscopy values.
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
The need for additional non-surgical intervention
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
The need for additional surgical intervention for PAL such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with mechanical pleurodesis, blebectomy or lobectomy
Time Frame: From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)
From enrollment until 8 weeks follow-up (as per standard of care for bronchoscopic treatment of PALs)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024P001113

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.