The Effects of Foam Rolling on Ankle Dorsiflexion, Ankle Stability, and Athletic Performance in Rhythmic Gymnasts
The Effects of Foam Rolling During the Warm-Up Phase on Range of Motion, Ankle Stability and Leaping Performance in Young Elite Rhythmic Gymnasts
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Palermo, Italy, 90144
- University of Palermo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active participation in competitive training programs (at least 10 hours per week), at least one year of experience in competitions organized by the Italian Gymnastics Federation, and no recent injuries.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of current or not fully recovered injuries to the ankle or foot, and irregular participation in training sessions within the four weeks preceding the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Group (CG)
|
|
|
Experimental: Experimental: Foam Rolling (FR)
Three sets, each lasting 60 seconds, with a 30-second break between sets for two times for week.
During each FR session, a complete sequential movement was always performed, starting from the gastrocnemius muscles and ending with the soleus.
A metronome was set to play one complete repetition every 2 seconds to establish the speed of execution.
|
For the FR, participants were asked to place the roller behind their leg.
Three sets, each lasting 60 seconds, with a 30-second break between sets, were performed, for a total of 90 rolls per set.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Counter Movement Jump (CMJ)
Time Frame: At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
Initially, the athlete stands upright on a flat surface or force platform, feet shoulder-width apart, hands on hips (to eliminate arm swing).
Without a pause, the athlete performs a quick downward movement (countermovement) by bending the knees and hips, then immediately jumps vertically as high as possible.
The athlete lands in an upright position on the same spot, trying to absorb the impact with knees slightly bent.
Jump height and flight time is recorded using an optical system, Optojump™ system(Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) connected to a personal computer with dedicated software(OptojumpTM Next software).
The system consists of two optical bars, a receiver and a transmitter, positioned 1m apart.
The bars identify ground contact time(with a precision of 1ms) and then convert non-contact time into cm.
Based on recommendations on optimal jump height (20 to 60cm).
|
At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
|
Ankle Dorsiflexion ROM
Time Frame: At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
Each participant was fitted with an inertial sensor (Beyond Inertial, Motusech, Roma, Itay) in the center of the foot, using an elastic band supplied with the sensor.
The starting position was standardized with the subjects sitting on a medical bed with the popliteal cord attached to the edge of the bed, forming a 90° angle.
The position of the foot, on the other hand, was placed in a neutral position using a laser level.
Subsequently, the dorsal flexion movement was performed.
|
At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
|
Ankle Stability
Time Frame: At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
Ankle stability was assessed using a functional monopodalic protocol, which involved four jumps on one foot: two per leg, both frontally and laterally.
These jumps were performed by stepping over an adjustable obstacle set at 70% of the maximum height reached on a pressure platform (SensorMedica freeMed 40×40, Guidonia Montecelio, Italy).
The platform has an active sensory surface of 40×40 cm with a thickness of only 8 mm and a low weight of approximately 4 kg.
Inside, there are resistive sensors coated in 24K gold on conductive rubber, with a density of approximately 10,000 sensors/m².The acquisition frequency is high, up to 400 Hz, allowing for detailed dynamic analysis, and the sensors have a life cycle of over 1,000,000 cycles of use
|
At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 3-week treatment (T1)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 62141-2025-1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Athletes
-
NCT04920266CompletedFluid Intake in Athletes | Sweating Rate in Athletes | Sweat Chloride Concentration in Athletes
-
NCT07548515Not yet recruitingAthletes | Nutrition Physiology | The Focus of This Study is to Describe the Body Composition and Metabolism of Athletes and Non-athletes
-
NCT07392385CompletedAthletes | Sports Performance | Visual-Motor Processing | Neuro-Psychophysiological Responses in Athletes
-
NCT06318728Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06181487Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06017180Recruiting
-
NCT07503977Completed
Clinical Trials on Foam Rolling (FR)
-
NCT06877832Completed
-
NCT04161300Completed
-
NCT05801302CompletedAchilles Tendon | Foam Roller
-
NCT06994013CompletedMyofascial Release
-
NCT05764837Completed
-
NCT05725811Completed
-
NCT03516149CompletedProprioceptive Disorders
-
NCT07025746Completed
-
NCT07433543CompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Young Adults