Adaptation of SFA for HRW
Adapting Stress First Aid (SFA) to the Needs of Harm Reduction Workers (HRWs) Serving Persons Who Use Drugs (PWUD) - Training and Pilot Testing Phase (Aim 2 and Aim 3)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
- The University of Texas at Austin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Legal age of majority (18 +),
- Ability to read and speak conversational English, and
- Work as an HRW in substance misuse.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stress First Aid
Harm Reduction Workers received Stress First Aid training and learning collaboratives
|
The intervention was a 2-hour, in-person SFA/HRW training followed by 30-minute monthly learning collaboratives to address occupational stress of harm reduction workers.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Knowledge of Stress First Aid (SFA) Assessed by Stress First Aid Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs - Knowledge Sub-Scale at 4 Months
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
A 3-item, 5-point Likert type sub-scale of Stress First Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs Scale, developed by the developers of Stress First Aid (SFA), with a minimum score 1 "Does not describe me at all", maximum score 5 "Describes me very well", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
|
Mean Confidence in Stress First Aid (SFA) Assessed by Stress First Aid Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs - Confidence Sub-Scale at 4 Months
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
A 6-item, 5-point Likert type sub-scale of Stress First Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs Scale, developed by the developers of Stress First Aid (SFA), with a minimum score 1 "Does not describe me at all", maximum score 5 "Describes me very well", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
|
Mean Beliefs in Stress First Aid (SFA) Assessed by Stress First Aid Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs - Beliefs Sub-Scale at 4 Months
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
A 5-item, 5-point Likert type sub-scale of Stress First Knowledge, Confidence, and Beliefs Scale, developed by the developers of Stress First Aid (SFA), with a minimum score 1 "Does not describe me at all", maximum score 5 "Describes me very well", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Assessed from enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 months, 4 months reported
|
|
Mean Acceptability of SFA Assessed by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
A 4-item, 5-point Likert-type scale from Weiner et al., 2017, with a minimum score 1 "Completely disagree", maximum score 5 "Completely agree", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
|
Mean Appropriateness of SFA Assessed by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
A 4-item, 5-point Likert-type scale from Weiner et al., 2017, with a minimum score 1 "Completely disagree", maximum score 5 "Completely agree", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
|
Mean Feasibility of SFA Assessed by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
A 4-item, 5-point Likert-type scale from Weiner et al., 2017, with a minimum score 1 "Completely disagree", maximum score 5 "Completely agree", where a higher score is a better outcome.
|
Immediately after the 2-hour, in-person training.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00006228
- R61DA059887 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.