Phase 3 Randomized Trial for Refractory ADV or CMV Infection With Family Matched CTLs and Standard of Care (SOC) vs SOC Alone

September 8, 2026 updated by: New York Medical College

An Open-Label Prospective Randomized Trial of Family Donor-Derived ADV or CMV CTLs Plus Standard of Care (SOC) vs SOC Alone in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) With Refractory ADV or CMV Infection/Viremia

Patients with refractory ADV or CMV infection post allogeneic stem cell transplant will be randomized to either Family donor-derived viral specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) plus standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We hypothesize that Family donor-derived viral specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) manufactured by direct selection utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy® and Cytokine Capture System® plus standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with medically refractory viral infection/viremia and/or intolerant or resistant to anti-viral antibiotic therapy will be associated with a significantly improved probability of Day +100 (time of onset on study) viral progression free survival (VPFS).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
138

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Valhalla, New York, United States, 10595
        • Recruiting
        • New York Medical College
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mitchell S Cairo, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Medical College of Wisconsin
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient Eligibility Cohort 1 (ADV) -Patients with ADV viremia (Cohort 1) post AlloHSCT with one or more of the following: Increasing or persistent ADV RT-PCR DNA (> 1000 ADV PCR copies) after 7 days of appropriate anti-viral therapy AND/OR Medical intolerance to anti-viral therapies including one or more of the following: > grade 2 renal insufficiency secondary to cidofovir and/or other > grade 2 toxicities secondary to cidofovir AND/OR Known resistance to cidofovir

Patient Eligibility (Cohort 2) (CMV)

-Patients with CMV viremia with one or more of the following: Increasing or persistent CMV RT-PCR DNA (>1000 copies) after 7 days of appropriate anti-viral therapy AND/OR Medical intolerance to anti-CMV antibiotic therapies: ANC < 500/mm3 secondary to ganciclovir AND/OR > grade 2 renal toxicity secondary to either foscarnet or cidofovir AND/OR Known resistance to ganciclovir and/or foscarnet

  • Consent: written informed consent given (by patient or legal representative) prior to any study related procedures
  • Performance Status >30% (Lansky < 16 yrs and Karnofsky > 16 years (BOTH COHORTS)
  • Age: 0.01 to 30.00 years (BOTH COHORTS)
  • Females of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at study entry only (BOTH COHORTS)
  • Family related donor (> 3 HLA match) that screens positive for ADV5 MACS Peptivator (Cohort 1) or PP65CMV MACS Peptivator (Cohort 2)

Donor Eligibility

  • Related donor available with a T-cell response to the ADV MACS PepTivators (Cohort 1) or CMV MACS PepTivator (Cohort 2). As defined in Appendix II, B, 8.2, the donor is considered suitable if the percentage of IFN+ T-cells is >0.01% after stimulation with ADV PepTivators (Cohort 1) or CMV PepTivators (Cohort 2).
  • Third-party related allogeneic donor: If original donor is not available or does not have a T-cell response to ADV MCAS PepTivator (Cohort 1) or CMV PepTivator (Cohort 2), third party allogeneic donor (family donor > 3 HLA A, B, DR match to recipient) with a T-cell response at least to the ADV MCAS PepTivator (Cohort 1) or CMV PepTivator (Cohort 2) AND
  • Allogeneic donor disease screening is complete similar to hematopoietic stem cell donors (Appendix 1) AND
  • Obtained informed consents by donor or donor legally authorized representative prior to donor collection

Patient Exclusion Criteria (Both Cohorts)

  • Patient with acute GVHD > grade 2 or moderate or extensive chronic GVHD at the time of CTL infusion.
  • Patient receiving steroids (>0.5 mg/kg prednisone equivalent) at the time of CTL infusion.
  • Patient treated with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) within 4 weeks prior to CTL infusion.
  • Patient with poor performance status determined by Karnofksy (patients > 16 yrs) or Lansky (patients < 16 years) score < 30%.
  • Concomitant enrollment in another experimental clinical trial investigating the treatment of refractory ADV or CMV infections.
  • Any known medical condition which cold compromise participation in the study according to investigators assessment.
  • Known AIDS or uncontrolled HIV infection
  • Known hypersensitivity to iron dextran
  • Encephalitis and/or retinitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care Medication
Patients will receive standard of care antiviral therapy for CMV or ADV at the discretion of the physician.
Drug: Standard of Care Antiviral medications
Standard of Care medications will be selected by the treating physician for either ADV (Cohort 1) or CMV (cohort 2)
Experimental: Standard of Care Medication plus Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (CTLs)
Patients will be randomized to receiving standard of care antiviral therapy plus family matched donor derived CTLs.
Drug: Standard of Care Antiviral medications
Standard of Care medications will be selected by the treating physician for either ADV (Cohort 1) or CMV (cohort 2)
Biological: Viral CTLs
ADV or CMV family matched CTLs will be administered with SOC medications one every 2 weeks as needed up to 5 infusions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Viral PCR to determine resolution of disease
Time Frame: Day 100
Patients will be monitored weekly by peripheral blood qtPCR values to monitor viral levels for resolution confirmation.
Day 100

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New York Medical College

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell Cairo, MD, New York Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NYMC 622

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings