Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
Impact of Wearing Two Different Implant Retained Mandibular Overdentures on Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention (Randomized Clinical Trial)
The global increase in the aging population has led to a rise in total edentulism, which remains a major public health concern. two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures have been regarded as the standard of care, offering superior retention, stability, comfort, and masticatory efficiency compared to conventional dentures. Among available attachment systems-bar, ball, stud, and magnet-the Equator attachment has gained popularity due to its low vertical profile, suitability for limited inter-occlusal space, and ease of handling.
Assessment of masticatory performance and occlusal balance can be objectively measured using devices such as bite force analyzers and the computerized T-Scan system, which quantifies occlusion and disocclusion times.
Conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) remains the most widely used denture base material; however, it has mechanical and biological limitations. Flexible denture base materials have been introduced to overcome these drawbacks by enhancing adaptation, distributing occlusal loads more evenly, and improving comfort and retention.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
24 Patients will be randomly and equally divided into two treatment groups:
- Group 1: Each patient in this group will receive conventional maxillary and mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin PMMA. In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by equator attachments.
- Group 2: Patients in this group received the same type of treatment as the patients in group 1, but the mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin "breflex" The present study will be performed to compare the difference in retention, occlusal force distribution, occlusion and disocclusion time, and bite force for implant retained mandibular over denture using PMMA and flexible dentures base materials
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 4470351
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients age must range from 60-70 years old.
- All patients' ridges should be covered with firm mucosa free from any signs of inflammation or ulceration and exhibit adequate height and width of the residual alveolar ridge.
- Patients should be free from any metabolic or bone disorder that contraindicate implant installation.
- All patients must have sufficient inter arch space
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with oral or systemic diseases.
- Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism or clenching).
- Heavy smoker or alcoholic patients.
- Patients with history of temporo-mandibular dysfunction.
- Patients with brain disorders or psychiatric disorders
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Mandibular complete dentures processed into heat cured acrylic resin
Mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin (PMMA).
In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.
|
Mandibular complete dentures made of heat-cured acrylic resin (PMMA).
In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.
|
|
Experimental: Mandibular thermoplastic nylon denture
Mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin breflex, In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments.
|
Mandibular overdentures were made of the flexible acrylic resin breflex, In the mandible, two implants were inserted in the symphyseal area and retained by Equator attachments
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Occlusal force distribution
Time Frame: Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
Occlusal force distribution will be measured by T-Scan, The latest version (T-Scan III) provides a dynamic visual evaluation of a patient's occlusion from initial tooth contact to maximum intercuspation.
The system records relative force values and allows objective quantitative evaluation of occlusal balance by recording numerical values for occlusion and disocclusion times
|
Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention of lower denture
Time Frame: Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
Retention of lower denture will be measured using digital force gauge, Retention will be measured using digital force gauge A digital force meter was used to measure denture resistance to vertical displacement (i.e., retention) by applying a pulling force on a metal hook located in the geometric center of each mandibular conventional denture that was identified on the lower cast at the intersection of three lines bisecting the angles of the triangle, formed by both retromolar pads and the midline.
Measurement of mandibular denture retention: The patient was instructed to place his head on chin rest and occlusal plane was set parallel to the floor.
Tongue freedom was checked then and three minutes seating time was allowed before taking the measurements.
A vertical pulling force was applied using the metallic probe of the digital force-meter that was attached to the hook present at the geometric center of mandibular denture.
Average value of six readings was recorded.
|
Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
|
occlusion time
Time Frame: Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
occlusion and disocclusion time will be measured by T-Scan, The latest version (T-Scan III) provides a dynamic visual evaluation of a patient's occlusion from initial tooth contact to maximum intercuspation.
The system records relative force values and allows objective quantitative evaluation of occlusal balance by recording numerical values for occlusion times
|
Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Biting force
Time Frame: Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
Biting force will be measured by bite force meter
|
Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Disocclusion time
Time Frame: Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
will be measured by T-Scan, The latest version (T-Scan III) provides a dynamic visual evaluation of a patient's occlusion from initial tooth contact to maximum intercuspation.
The system records relative force values and allows objective quantitative evaluation of occlusal balance by recording numerical values for disocclusion times
|
Follow up visits were scheduled at denture insertion, 6, and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 28.4.24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Implant
-
NCT05712031CompletedDental Implant | Short Dental Implant
-
NCT07656597Not yet recruitingDental Implant | Single Tooth Dental Implant | Implant Therapy | Guided Surgery Accuracy | Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) | Delayed Implant | Immediate Dental Implant Placement
-
NCT06286579Not yet recruitingDental Implant | Dental Implant-Abutment Design
-
NCT05843981Not yet recruitingDental Implant | Dental Implant-Abutment Design
-
NCT06926101CompletedDental Implant | Edentulism | Dental Implant Therapy
-
NCT06099834CompletedDental Implant Failed | Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant
-
NCT02864862CompletedDental Implant | Soft Tissue Augmentation | Immediate Dental Implant
-
NCT07589140Not yet recruitingDental Implant | Immediate Dental Implant Placement | Bone Grafting
-
NCT05016258RecruitingDental Implant | Dental Restoration | Dentistry | Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis
-
NCT02134743CompletedDental Implant Failed | Pre-osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant
Clinical Trials on Conventional acrylic resin denture
-
NCT07271641CompletedDental Implant | Implant Supported Overdenture | Complete Edentulism | Edentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth | Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible | Attachments
-
NCT03221361Unknown
-
NCT03043456UnknownMicrobial Colonization | Satisfaction
-
NCT06588140CompletedEdentulous Alveolar Ridge | Denture,Complete
-
NCT03385746UnknownAnodontia of Permanent Dentition
-
NCT03391063Unknown
-
NCT06881199Active, not recruitingQuality of Life | Satisfaction, Patient | Complete Edentulism
-
NCT07523802RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Gingival Recessions | Mucogingival Defects
-
NCT04446078CompletedDental Implants | Prosthesis Survival | Mandible | Dental Materials
-
NCT06233552Completed