Implant Rehabilitations in a Hospital Setting
Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Implant Rehabilitations in a Hospital Setting: a Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Carlo Lajolo, MD, DDS
- Phone Number: +390630154286
- Email: carlo.lajolo@unicatt.it
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients requiring implant surgery for edentulous rehabilitation;
- Age > 18;
- Achievement of FMPS and FMBS ≤ 15%;
- Signed written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension;
- Uncontrolled periodontal disease;
- Inability to perform consistent and continuous follow-up;
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- Inability to provide written informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Implant-supported rehabilitation
Patients aged >18 years who require implant-supported rehabilitation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Peri-implant marginal bone loss
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Measurements were performed in millimeters using intraoral radiographs.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Implant survival rate
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Rate of dental implants remaining in situ, measured as a proportion.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant success rate
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Absence of biological and technical complications, expressed as a proportion.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Prosthesis survival rate
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Rate of prostheses remaining in situ, expressed as a proportion.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Prosthesis success rate
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Absence of technical complications, expressed as a proportion.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Esthetic evaluation
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Assessed using the PES/WES esthetic index.
Scores range from 0 to 14 for the PES and from 0 to 10 for the WES, with higher scores indicating better esthetic outcomes.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Recorded using a specifically designed questionnaire and measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Volumetric analysis
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Assessed by superimposing the baseline volume with the volume recorded during follow-up using intraoral scans, measured in cubic millimeters.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Glycated hemoglobin level
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of glycated hemoglobin levels recorded at baseline and during follow-up.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Diabetes
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of the influence of diabetes during follow-up.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Influence of medications relevant to bone/tissue metabolism
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of the influence of medications relevant to bone and tissue metabolism.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Osteoporosis
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of influence of osteoporosis.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Cardiovascular disease
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of influence of cardiovascuar disease.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
|
Complete Blood Count
Time Frame: From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Analysis of the influence of complete blood count parameters.
|
From Implant placement to 5 year follow up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carlo Lajolo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. gemelli, IRCCS
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217.
- den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1073-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01330.x.
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
- Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(4):388-99.
- Nir-Hadar O, Palmer M, Soskolne WA. Delayed immediate implants: alveolar bone changes during the healing period. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Feb;9(1):26-33. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090104.x.
- 3) Branemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration. In: BranemarkPI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, Rosen HM, eds. Tissue-IntegratedProstheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago:Quintessence Publishing Company, Inc; 1985:11-76.
- Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Beyabanaki E. Interim Prosthesis Options for Dental Implants. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;26(4):331-338. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12421. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ID 7698
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.