Prostate Cancer Early Detection Using Serial MRI Examinations (PROCEDE)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Gaelle GF FIARD, Professor
- Phone Number: +33 0476767971
- Email: gfiard@chu-grenoble.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Assilah AB bouzit
- Phone Number: +33 0476767971
- Email: abouzit@chu-grenoble.fr
Study Locations
-
-
Grenoble
-
Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 38043
- University Hospital Grenoble
-
Contact:
- Assilah bouzit
- Phone Number: +33 0476767971
- Email: abouzit@chu-grenoble.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men aged over 18 years
- Men with an estimated life expectancy of more than 10 years
- Biopsy-naïve men
- PSA level ≤ 20 ng/ml
- Presence, on the first multiparametric prostate MRI, of a PIRADS 3-5 lesion confirmed by local rereading if the MRI was performed outside the center
- MRI of sufficient quality (PI-QUAL score 2-3)
- PIRADS 3 lesion with a PSA density <0.15 ng/ml/ml
- No signs of extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion (MRI stage T2 confirmed by local rereading if MRI performed outside the center)
- No suspicious lymph node (confirmed by local rereading if MRI performed outside the center)
- Patient is insured (affiliated with the national health insurance system or benefiting from such coverage)
- Signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Men already under surveillance for a known MRI lesion (except if the previous MRI was performed less than 6 months ago)
- Known mutation in DNA repair genes or suggestive family history
- PIRADS 3 lesion with PSA density < 0.15 ng/ml/ml
- PIRADS 5 lesion with suspected extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
- Suspicion of lymph node involvement
- Multiparametric prostate MRI showing a PIRADS 1-2 lesion
- Use of treatments that may modify the appearance of MRI lesions: 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, hormone therapy
- Patient with severe renal insufficiency (GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m²)
- Contraindication to gadolinium injection
- Contraindication to prostate biopsy
- Vulnerable persons (covered by Articles L1111-6 to L1111-8 of the French Public Health Code)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Prostate biopsy
Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will undergo prostate biopsies
|
|
|
Experimental: MRI surveillance
Patients randomized to the experimental arm will proceed with MRI surveillance.
|
Patients randomized to the experimental arm will proceed with MRI surveillance.
A follow-up visit is planned at 6 months with the result of a PSA test, and it is possible at each investigator's discretion, to prescribe the follow-up MRI at 6 months in case of rising PSA.
Otherwise, the repeat MRI will be scheduled one year after the initial MRI.
Images will also be sent to the coordinating center for central reviewing of the new MRI exam and assessment of progression.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To evaluate the impact of a novel early detection strategy based on serial MRI
Time Frame: at 2 years
|
To evaluate the impact of a novel early detection strategy based on serial MRI exams, compared to the standard of care, on the rate of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer
|
at 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To assess the impact of a new early-detection strategy based on repeated MRI
Time Frame: at 5 years.
|
Time to the first event among (i) definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer, defined as one of the following procedures: radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy, focal therapy; (ii) occurrence of prostate cancer metastases; (iii) all-cause death, occurring between randomization and 5-year follow-up.
|
at 5 years.
|
|
To assess the impact of the new strategy on the number of prostate biopsies performed
Time Frame: at 2 years and 5 years.
|
Number of biopsy procedures performed.
|
at 2 years and 5 years.
|
|
To assess changes in therapeutic options with the new strategy
Time Frame: at 2 years and 5 years.
|
Choice of definitive treatment, if applicable, among the following options: (i) brachytherapy, (ii) focal therapy, and (iii) unimodal therapy.
|
at 2 years and 5 years.
|
|
To assess the oncologic safety with Adverse pathological criteria (pT3, pN1, detectable PSA)of the new strategy compared with the usual strategy
Time Frame: at 2 years and 5 years.
|
Adverse pathological criteria (pT3, pN1, detectable PSA) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
|
at 2 years and 5 years.
|
|
To assess the oncologic outcomes (Biochemical recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival.of the new strategy compared with the usual strategy
Time Frame: at 2 years and 5 years.
|
Biochemical recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival (i.e., censoring non-disease-related deaths), and overall survival.
|
at 2 years and 5 years.
|
|
To assess the impact of the new strategy on patients' anxiety levels and quality of life, evaluated at Day 0 and then annually for 5 years.
Time Frame: at 5 years
|
HADS scale, MAX-PC questionnaire, EPIC-26 questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The combination of these questionnaires will allow us to assess the level of anxiety and the quality of life of patients treated with the new strategy; we have decided to use them together for a combined evaluation. |
at 5 years
|
|
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the new early-detection strategy compared with the standard of care from a societal perspective
Time Frame: at 5 years.
|
ICUR.
The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) will be calculated by dividing the mean difference in costs by the mean difference in QALYs (estimated from the EQ-5D-5L).
The ratio will be expressed as cost per healthy life-year gained.
|
at 5 years.
|
|
To establish an MRI database enabling comparison of radiomic characteristics between patients who have progressed and those who have not, in order to identify new imaging features associated with disease progression.
Time Frame: at 5 years
|
Database collecting all MRI examinations in DICOM format, along with oncologic outcomes (progression/no progression).
|
at 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 38RC24.0296
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.