Royal Ancient Oats™ Study (RAO)

January 19, 2026 updated by: Standard Process Inc.

Impact of Royal Ancient Oats™ on Glycemic Response and Digestive Enzymes

Evaluating the effects of high avenanthramide ancient oat (Royal Ancient Oats™) muffins versus conventional oat muffins in regard to glycemic control.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized, two-period crossover trial with a run-in control baseline and repeated measures, designed to evaluate the effects of high avenanthramide ancient oat (Royal Ancient Oats™) muffins versus conventional oat muffins on glycemic control and related metabolic parameters. A total of 38 non-diabetic adults (HbA1c < 5.7%), who are either overweight (BMI 25-29.9) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) will start with a repeated measures baseline using regular flour (white wheat) muffins for three consecutive days. Following this, participants will be divided into two groups: 19 in the conventional oat muffin group and 19 in the Royal Ancient Oats™ muffin group. This sample size provides 90% power to detect a difference in AUC of at least 20% between treatments, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Kannapolis, North Carolina, United States, 28081
        • Recruiting
        • Standard Process Nutrition Innovation Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chinmayee Panda, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-diabetic (HbA1c<5.7%) adults both men and women between the ages of 35-65 years with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 25 to 30 kg/m2
  • Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be screened prior to starting the study and must be able to adhere to the requirements of the study.
  • Willing to comply with study procedures and supplement regimens.
  • Providing consent to participate in the study.
  • Willing to limit/minimize foods that are rich sources of fiber and high carb content.
  • Participants should avoid taking any non-prescription/over-the-counter medications or nutritional supplements that could influence glycemic response. This includes vitamins, herbal supplements, and any medications affecting metabolism. Examples include probiotics and prebiotics, vit D, vit B12, Ginseng, fenugreek, weight loss supplements like green tea extract and Garcinia cambogia, fiber supplements like inulin and Psyllium husk. If participants need to make any changes due to health reasons, they should consult with the study coordinator before doing so.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have experienced weight loss or gain exceeding 5% of their body weight in the past 3 months, including those involved in any weight loss or weight gain programs through diet and/or lifestyle changes.
  • Participants currently taking medications that could alter metabolism, such as weight loss medications, anti-hypertensive drugs, or lipid-lowering medications.
  • Participants with any chronic metabolic diseases, including diabetes, or those using supplements other than a daily multivitamin.
  • Pregnant or lactating women will be excluded from the study.
  • Participants who use tobacco products.
  • Participants who are unwilling to limit or minimize foods that are rich sources of fiber and high carbohydrate content.
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (e.g., more than two drinks per day for men and more than one drink per day for women)
  • Inconsistency in recent or planned changes in non-prescription/over-the-counter medications or nutritional supplements affecting glycemic response, including vitamins (e.g., Vitamin D, Vitamin B12), herbal supplements (e.g., Ginseng, Fenugreek), weight loss supplements (e.g., green tea extract, Garcinia cambogia), fiber supplements (e.g., inulin, psyllium husk), and probiotics/prebiotics.
  • Inability or unwillingness to maintain the current regimen of these medications and supplements throughout the study period without consulting the study coordinator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A: Order of receiving muffins differs
Dietary supplement: Royal Ancient Oat Flour™
muffins made with Royal Ancient Oat Flour™
Experimental: B: Order of receiving muffins differs
Dietary supplement: Royal Ancient Oat Flour™
muffins made with Royal Ancient Oat Flour™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the effect of consuming high avenanthramide Royal Ancient Oats™ muffins or conventional oat muffins versus white wheat flour muffins on postprandial glycemic response.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for glucose levels over 24 hours, as measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM).
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effect of Royal Ancient Oats™ on incretin hormone secretion and satiety hormones.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Subjective measures of hunger and satiety using Visual Analog Scales (VAS).
2 weeks
To evaluate the effect of Royal Ancient Oats™ on incretin hormone secretion and satiety hormones.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in GLP-1 levels (pg/mL)
2 weeks
To evaluate the effect of Royal Ancient Oats™ on incretin hormone secretion and satiety hormones.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in leptin (pg/mL)
2 weeks
To evaluate the effect of Royal Ancient Oats™ on incretin hormone secretion and satiety hormones.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in adiponectin (ng/mL)
2 weeks
To evaluate the effect of Royal Ancient Oats™ on incretin hormone secretion and satiety hormones.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in peptide YY (pg/mL)
2 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate changes in weight, waist circumference, and body composition before and after dietary intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in body weight (kilograms, kg) measured using a calibrated digital scale (InBody)
2 weeks
To evaluate changes in weight, waist circumference, and body composition before and after dietary intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in waist circumference (centimeters, cm) measured using a flexible, non-stretchable measuring tape at the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest.
2 weeks
To evaluate changes in weight, waist circumference, and body composition before and after dietary intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in body fat percentage (%) as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (e.g., InBody).
2 weeks
To evaluate changes in weight, waist circumference, and body composition before and after dietary intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in skeletal muscle mass (kg) as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (e.g., InBody).
2 weeks
To evaluate changes in weight, waist circumference, and body composition before and after dietary intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Changes in visceral fat level (arbitrary units) as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (e.g., InBody).
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Standard Process Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SP027

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings