Oral Health Intervention in Hemodialysis Patients
The Effect of Oral Care Education and Reminder Cards on Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment: A Quasi-experimental Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Çanakkale, Turkey (Türkiye), 17100
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- being 18 years of age or older,
- receiving HD treatment three or four times a week for at least 6 months,
- having no hearing, visual, or speech impairment,
- having no diagnosis of malignancy,
- performing self-oral care,
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who refused to participate in the study,
- did not meet the inclusion criteria,
- did not consent to an oral examination,
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
experimental group
Experimental: arm description experimental Arm Description: The socio-demographic and descriptive characteristics and disease adaptation levels included in the survey form were answered through face-to-face interviews.
Participants' oral health was assessed.
Oral care education was provided.
Disease adaptation levels and oral health were assessed one week after the education.
|
After the pre-test application, one-on-one oral care education, lasting an average of 15 minutes, was conducted for each participant.
The content of the education included: oral health in adults; the consequences of poor oral hygiene; points to consider for oral health; demonstration of the brushing technique; coping with care-resistant behaviors; and how to use the oral health reminder card and checklist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oral Assessment Guide
Time Frame: one weeks
|
The guide allows for the assessment of voice, swallowing, lips, tongue, saliva, mucous membrane, gums, and teeth/dentures.
The OAG supports the creation of an oral care protocol for patients with impaired oral mucous membranes.
Each change related to oral health is scored between 1 and 3 points, and these scores are summed to obtain the total score.
Scores obtainable from the OAG range from 8 to 24.
A score between 8 and 14 indicates a "risk of impairment in the oral mucous membrane," while a score between 14 and 24 indicates "impairment in the oral mucous membrane."
According to the OAG, a low score indicates good oral health, whereas high scores suggest poor oral health.
A light source and a tongue depressor for each participant were used when evaluating oral health.
|
one weeks
|
|
Oral Health Reminder Card
Time Frame: one weeks
|
The card contains a total of 10 items regarding what should be paid attention to in daily oral health and was prepared based on the literature.
The reminder cards were 10x15 cm in size, and participants were asked to place these cards somewhere visible in their homes.
The reminder cards were not taken back.
|
one weeks
|
|
Oral Health Checklist
Time Frame: one weeks
|
This form contains the items listed on the Oral Health Reminder Card.
Participants were asked to implement the items on the checklist and mark them as applied.
Participants had the opportunity to evaluate whether they performed the oral health items every day over a one-week period.
|
one weeks
|
|
Adaptation to Chronic Illness Scale
Time Frame: one weeks
|
The scale comprises 25 items across three subdomains, including physical, social, and psychological adjustment.
The scale is designed as a 5-point Likert scale (with 1 = Strongly Disagree and 5 = Completely Agree).
Items 5, 6, 12, 17, 19, 20, 24, and 25 are reverse scored.
Maximum score that can be obtained from the scale is 125.
Higher scores from the subdomains or the entire scale are indicative of the fact that the patients' level of adaptation to the disease is also high.
The Cronbach's Alpha value of the scale is 0.88 for the entire scale.
|
one weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: SEVDA ATEŞ, Associate Professor, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- COMU-SBF-SA-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.