Validating DW-MRI and Fat Fraction in Multiple Myeloma Post-ASCT: The RAC-FAT Study"

September 7, 2026 updated by: Fondazione EMN Italy Onlus

Multicenter Observational Study for the Validation of the Predictive Role of Diffusion-Weighted Whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) Imaging Response According to MY-RADS Criteria (RAC Score) and Fat Fraction (rFF%) After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With First-Line Anti-CD38-Based Therapy (RAC-FAT Study)

This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective-prospective study designed to validate the predictive role of advanced imaging in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The main purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of radiological response categories (Response Assessment Category, RAC score) and evaluate the predictive value of relative Fat Fraction (rFF%) using Diffusion-Weighted Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) in patients who have undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after receiving first-line anti-CD38-based quadruplet induction therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The role of functional imaging in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has become essential for assessing treatment response. This study focuses on the Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS) guidelines and the quantitative parameter of rFF% to identify "functional high-risk" patients who may experience early relapse despite achieving conventional deep responses.The study will involve two cohorts:Retrospective Cohort: Includes patients treated since January 1st, 2020, with available post-ASCT DW-MRI data performed during routine clinical practice.Prospective Cohort: Includes newly diagnosed patients enrolled after their standard-of-care ASCT and post-transplant DW-MRI assessment.Participants will not receive any investigational or trial-specific treatment. All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures follow the current standard of care. Data regarding clinical characteristics, treatment details (induction, ASCT, maintenance), DW-MRI parameters (RAC score, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], and rFF% values), and minimal residual disease (MRD) will be collected and recorded in an anonymized electronic Case Report Form (eCRF).The study aims to enroll a minimum of 92 participants to evaluate:Primary Endpoint: Prevalence of RAC1 and RAC≥2 categories post-ASCT.Secondary Endpoints: Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) stratified by RAC score and rFF%, and the concordance between imaging results and bone marrow MRD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
92

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for transplantation and have been treated according to the most recent standards of care.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed MM participants eligible for ASCT, treated with anti-CD38-based quadruplet induction therapy and ASCT, with post-ASCT/premaintenance DW-MRI available (in tandem ASCT, DW-MRI after second ASCT will be considered).
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF) that he or she understands the purpose of, and procedures required for the trial and is willing to participate in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Absence of post-ASCT/pre-maintenance DW-MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Observational: MM Patient Cohort
This cohort includes transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who have completed first-line anti-CD38-based quadruplet induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).
Diagnostic test: DW-MRI (MY-RADS/RAC score)
Collection and analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Whole-body MRI data performed post-ASCT. The radiological response is evaluated using the Response Assessment Category (RAC) score (1 to 5) according to MY-RADS criteria.
Diagnostic test: Fat Fraction (rFF%)
Quantitative assessment of the relative Fat Fraction (percentage of fat within skeletal regions) measured on residual focal lesions after transplantation to identify functional high-risk (FHR) patients.
Other: Clinical Data Collection
Retrospective and prospective collection of clinical outcomes, including Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) status from medical records.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiological Response Categories (RAC1 and RAC≥2)
Time Frame: Post-ASCT / Pre-maintenance (approx. 3-4 months after ASCT))
Prevalence of radiological response categories evaluated by post-ASCT DW-MRI according to MY-RADS criteria.
Post-ASCT / Pre-maintenance (approx. 3-4 months after ASCT))

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) according to RAC score
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
Defined as the time from the date of ASCT to the first documented disease progression (per IMWG criteria) or death from any cause.
Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
Overall Survival (OS) according to RAC score
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
Defined as the time from the date of ASCT to death from any cause.
Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
PFS and OS according to relative Fat Fraction (rFF%)
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
Evaluation of survival outcomes based on the 17.2% rFF% threshold identified on residual focal skeletal lesions.
Minimum 2 years, up to 4 years
RAC Score and IMWG Response Concordance
Time Frame: 4 months post-ASCT
To assess RAC score in relation to response according to IMWG criteria
4 months post-ASCT
Concordance between RAC score and bone marrow MRD
Time Frame: Pre-maintenance (approx. 100 days post-ASCT)
Assessment of the agreement between radiological response (RAC score) and Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) status (when available).
Pre-maintenance (approx. 100 days post-ASCT)
Early Relapse Rate and rFF%
Time Frame: 18 months post-ASCT)
Proportion of participants with early relapse (within 18 months post-ASCT) associated with rFF% < 17.2%.
18 months post-ASCT)
PFS by Combined MRD and RAC Score
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Evaluation of post-ASCT progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by the combined assessment of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) status and radiological Response Assessment Category (RAC) score.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
OS by Combined MRD and RAC Score
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Evaluation of post-ASCT overall survival (OS) stratified by the combined assessment of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) status and radiological Response Assessment Category (RAC) score.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione EMN Italy Onlus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RAC-FAT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings