Self-Management Support for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients After Hospital Discharge (ACS)

August 30, 2026 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Construction and Empirical Study of a "Hospital-to-Home" Self-Management Support Model for ACS Patients Based on the Integrated COM-B and HAPA Models

This randomized controlled trial evaluates a "Hospital-to-Home" self-management support model for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients, which is based on the integrated COM-B and HAPA theories. Participants are randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving a structured self-management program or a control group receiving standard education. The study compares self-management behaviors and health outcomes between the two groups to assess the model's effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital
  • Phone Number: 020-62707277
  • Email: 243206095@qq.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital
          • Phone Number: 020-62707277
          • Email: 243206095@qq.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1: Diagnosed with ACS according to the Guidelines for the Rapid Emergency Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome (2019), based on electrocardiogram (ECG), serological tests, and symptomatology;

    2: Mentally alert with unimpaired communication skills, possessing adequate reading and expressive abilities;

    3: atient or primary caregiver has proficiency in using WeChat;

    4: atient or primary caregiver has proficiency in using WeChat;

    5: Age >= 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1: Advanced or terminal stage of disease with an expected survival of less than 12 months;

    2: Severe physical comorbidities (e.g., decompensated cardiac, hepatic, or renal function);

    3: Presence of motor dysfunction or mobility impairment;

    4: Currently participating in or having previously participated in a similar clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants receive the structured self-management support program based on the integrated COM-B and HAPA models, including enhanced education and follow-up support.
Behavioral: COM-B and HAPA-based Self-management Support Program
This intervention is based on the integrated HAPA and COM-B models. Using HAPA, patients are categorized into three phases: pre-action (contemplation), action initiation (early post-discharge), and behavior maintenance (≥1 month post-discharge). Prior to discharge, a COM-B assessment identifies individual barriers and facilitators across capability, opportunity, and motivation. Tailored self-management support is then delivered according to the patient's phase and COM-B profile. The core intervention consists of one in-depth inpatient interview and three outpatient sessions for self-management planning, execution, and confirmation.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants receive standard care and routine health education.
Behavioral: Routine Health Education
Participants receive routine health education and standard care according to the hospital's standard clinical pathway for ACS patients. This includes basic discharge instructions, brochures on heart-healthy lifestyles, and routine outpatient follow-up appointments. No additional structured self-management support or extra telephone follow-ups are provided beyond standard care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management Scale (HHSES) score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
The Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management Scale (HHSES) is a 12-item instrument assessing participants' self-efficacy and self-management behaviors. Total scores range from 12 (minimum) to 48 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy and self-management. Scores ≥36 indicate high self-efficacy and self-management; 25-35 indicate a moderate level; and ≤24 indicate a low level. Administered at baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including heart failure, angina, arrhythmia, and recurrent myocardial infarction
Time Frame: From the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is a composite outcome defined as the occurrence of heart failure, angina, arrhythmia, or recurrent myocardial infarction. Reported as number and proportion of participants experiencing any component event and/or the composite MACE. Assessed from the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up.
From the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up
Emergency department visit rate for cardiac-related reasons
Time Frame: From the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up
Proportion of participants with emergency department visits for cardiac-related reasons during the follow-up period. Calculated as (number of participants with cardiac-related emergency department visits ÷ total number of eligible participants at start of follow-up) × 100%. Assessed from the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up.
From the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up
Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up
The Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) is a 10-item instrument assessing social support along three dimensions: objective support, subjective support, and utilization of social support. Total scores range from 13 to 70. Scores < 33 indicate low social support; 33-45 indicate moderate social support; and > 45 indicate high social support. Assessed at baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up
Chinese Version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up
The Chinese Version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is a 9-item instrument measuring illness perception. Total scores range from 0 (minimum) to 80 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse/more negative illness perception (stronger perceived threat or more negative views toward the illness). Assessed at baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
At baseline and at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up
Cardiovascular re-hospitalization rate
Time Frame: Assessed from the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up.
Proportion of participants re-hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons (e.g., heart failure, angina, arrhythmia, recurrent myocardial infarction) during the 12-month period after the end of treatment. Calculated as (number of participants re-hospitalized for ACS-related cardiovascular reasons during the follow-up period ÷ total number of eligible patients at the start of the follow-up period) × 100%. Assessed from the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up.
Assessed from the end of treatment through 60 weeks of follow-up.
Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-10) score
Time Frame: Assessed at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-10) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire using a dichotomous yes/no response format. It evaluates medication adherence across three dimensions: medication adherence behavior, attitude toward taking medication, and negative side effects and attitudes toward medication. Total scores range from 0 to 10. A score ≤ 5 indicates medication non-adherence, and a score ≥ 6 indicates medication adherence. Assessed at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.
Assessed at 13, 36, and 60 weeks of follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2026-428
  • 2025CR031 (Other Grant/Funding Number: 2025 Nanfang Hospital of South)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) including baseline characteristics, intervention implementation data, and primary and secondary outcome measures will be shared. The data sharing plan has been approved by the institutional ethics committee and included in the informed consent process.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available starting from 6 months after the publication of the main results and will remain accessible for a period of 3 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be granted to qualified researchers (clinicians and nursing scientists) who propose to use the data for legitimate scientific purposes. Interested researchers can submit a data request to the Principal Investigator via email. A data use agreement must be signed prior to data access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings