B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation (BASEL) Study - Private Practice

Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.

The aim is to test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

The primary endpoint is total medical cost within 3 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Most patients with dyspnea primarily consult physicians in private practice. Heart failure and pulmonary disease are "epidemic" disorders and account for the majority of cases of dyspnea. There are approximately 24 million individuals in the United States with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and another 10 million persons suffer from asthma. These illnesses generate in excess of 17 million physician office visits a year at a cost of over $10.4 billion. In addition, there are nearly 1.5 million new cases of heart failure in North America and Europe every year. The total direct cost of care for heart failure exceed $38 billion in the United States per year. Therefore, cost-effective management of these diseases is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. The symptoms of heart failure may be nonspecific, and signs are not sensitive enough and considerably overlap with those of pulmonary disease. In addition, signs of volume overload take time to evolve and may be completely absent in patients with acute heart failure.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a neurohormone secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to ventricular volume expansion and pressure overload. BNP levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. Recently, the researchers were able to show that the use of BNP levels significantly improves the management of patients with acute dyspnea in the emergency department. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might also be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

Primary endpoint: Total medical cost within 3 months. Secondary endpoints: Hospitalisation, time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy, 3-month mortality, dyspnea (NYHA) at 3 months, 12-month mortality, 12-month total medical cost, cost-effectiveness.

Patients and Methods: The trial is designed to enrol 250 patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 into a control group using evaluation of patients according to local standards without the use of BNP (or other natriuretic peptides) and to a BNP group with early testing for BNP by a rapid point-of-care assay during the first consultation in each private practice.

Expected results: It is the researchers' hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy will improve the evaluation and management and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

Significance: Given the significant morbidity associated with dyspnea, as well as the enormous expenses associated with heart failure and pulmonary disease, BNP testing could represent a major advance in clinical medicine. In addition, BNP testing in the appropriate clinical setting may prove very helpful in the attempts to reduce cost of health care to society without reducing (but possibly increasing) the quality of health care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Private practices of Baden-Wuertemberg
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4000
        • Private Practices of Kanton Basel Stadt
      • Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland, 4100
        • Private Practices of Kanton Basel-Landschaft
      • Chur, Switzerland, 7500
        • Private Practices of Kanton Graubünden
      • Sarnen, Switzerland, 6060
        • Private practices in Kanton Obwalden
      • Solothurn, Switzerland, 4500
        • Private practices of Kanton Solothurn
      • St. Gallen, Switzerland
        • Private practices of Kanton St. Gallen
    • Aargau
      • Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland, 4300
        • Private practices of Kanton Aargau
    • Schwyz
      • Altendorf, Schwyz, Switzerland, 8852
        • Private Practice of Kanton Schwyz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute dyspnoea is the main symptom

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Obvious traumatic cause
  • Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 250 umol/l)
  • Sepsis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: BNP blinded therapy
Clinical treatment without knowledge of BNP levels
Experimental: BNP guided therapy
Clinical treatment based on clinical examination and BNP-levels

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total medical cost within 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
therapy
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
3-month mortality
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Dyspnea (New York Heart Association [NYHA]) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
12-month mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
12-month total medical cost
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Mueller, Prof., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASEL III - Private Practice
  • PP00B-102853/1
  • 04.001
  • 287/03

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspnea

Clinical Trials on Clinical examination

Subscribe